Hacking with AI

The list collects real attacks in which, according to the linked source, an AI did part of the work. Malware and exploits written with AI count only once they have been used against a target. Also left out are lab demonstrations without a victim, attacks on AI systems, influence operations, and fraud or social engineering in which the AI only supplies the bait, such as phishing emails or deepfakes. Often the AI’s involvement is known only because the attackers left traces of their AI use, for example exposed session logs.

The list is sorted by the day a case became known, newest first. Every entry links its source. Entries were researched and pre-checked with AI agents, then proofread by a person.

augmented
A human runs the attack, and the AI takes on individual steps, such as reconnaissance, writing code, or sifting through stolen data.
directed-autonomous
A human picks the targets, and an agent carries out most of the attack steps itself.
fully autonomous
No human ordered the attack on the victim. So far, such cases have mostly occurred while a model was being tested or trained.

As of 2026⁠-⁠10⁠-⁠30, 324 incidents. Context · RSS

AI role
  • augmented
  • directed-autonomous
  • fully autonomous

As of 2026⁠-⁠10⁠-⁠30

2026

#

China-nexus group turns AI agents on foreign ministries (ARTEX, VAPOR PANDA)#

Key casedirected‑autonomous · Attack date October 2026
According to CrowdStrike, the China-nexus espionage group VAPOR PANDA used the agentic framework ARTEX, mainly with DeepSeek, against more than 200 organizations in at least 14 countries over eleven days starting October 17, 2026, including foreign ministries in Latin America, Europe, Asia and the Middle East and pharmaceutical, semiconductor and defense companies in the U.S. The group broke into the foreign ministries of two Latin American countries, an interior ministry in the Middle East and telecom providers in the U.S., Belgium and the Philippines, among others; CrowdStrike confirmed post-exploitation activity at nine organizations. The agent transcripts show an operator running several intrusions in parallel and instructing the agents in Chinese to, for example, write web shells and find machines without CrowdStrike’s sensor.
Caveat: All details come from CrowdStrike, which does not name the victims, and no victim has publicly confirmed an intrusion. CrowdStrike could not identify the commercial model ARTEX used alongside DeepSeek, and it says little about the basis for the attribution to VAPOR PANDA beyond links from the controller and the backdoor to the group’s infrastructure.
#

AI agent steals cloud credentials and goes after about 25 crypto exchanges and fintechs#

directed‑autonomous
In an intrusion investigated by Wiz, the attacker exploited a flaw in an AI agent backend, obtained credentials through the cloud metadata service and a Kubernetes token, exfiltrated secrets in bulk, established persistence and spread to several pods. Over about 21 hours, more than 150 scripts went after about 25 major crypto exchanges and fintechs in parallel. The comments in the scripts name the agent framework driving the operation and puzzle over how a second instance of the same agent had obtained a 600,000-row dump; Wiz reads this as an admission, in the attacker’s own words, that an agent was doing the hands-on work.
Caveat: Wiz names no victim, date or model and redacts the name of the agent framework. The post does not say how the roughly 25 organizations relate to the intrusion investigated or whether any of them were compromised, and it cites no prompts or agent logs.
#

Likely AI agent works through 602 steps after a break-in through a Java service#

augmented to directed‑autonomous
After an intrusion through a remote code execution flaw in a Java service, Wiz says, 602 steps across twelve groups of attack techniques ran in about four and a half hours, from reconnaissance through querying the cloud metadata service and the permissions of a stolen Kubernetes token to a message broker, databases and ArgoCD. When one path failed, such as the route to the metadata service, another was tried; every command ran inside a wrapper that truncated and encoded the output and sent it to the command server. The gaps between steps vary within seconds and grow with their complexity; Wiz sees in them the signature of a language model reading, reasoning and generating the next move.
Caveat: Wiz names no victim, date or model. It infers the AI’s role only from characteristics of the attack, chiefly the cadence of the steps and scripts that label their own actions; the post cites no prompts or agent logs.
#

Likely AI agent uses a hijacked Flowise instance to attack dozens more#

augmented to directed‑autonomous
Wiz investigated an attack in which the intruder took over an exposed instance of Flowise, a builder for AI agents, through a flaw that required no login and then exploited the same flaw against dozens of other Flowise instances at once. Over about 24 hours, 99 purpose-built scripts appeared; almost every one opens with a plan written in Chinese, and the second version of an API key validation tool explains why the first failed against one target’s customized configuration. Wiz reads the pace, the plans and the self-correction as signs of an AI agent.
Caveat: Wiz names no victim, date or model and does not say how many of the other instances were actually compromised. The post cites no prompts or agent logs.
#

Extortionist has the OpenCode AI agent write attack scripts (n0n)#

augmented · Attack date September 2026
In September 2026, SOCRadar found an exposed staging server belonging to an operator of the n0n extortion group, where the OpenCode AI coding agent had written and debugged hundreds of attack scripts. OpenCode was configured with 154 model entries from seven providers, including models stripped of safety training; spending on model access passed $7,216 by October 22. The files on the server name at least 23 affected organizations in 14 countries, among them a Venezuelan internet provider whose firewall rules the operator switched to block everything; every documented intrusion relied on weak or stolen credentials.
Caveat: Only the operator claims that the block at the Venezuelan provider cut nationwide network traffic, and SOCRadar cites no confirmation from victims.
#

AI-⁠driven attack exposes customer data at registrar 123 Reg (ARTEX)#

augmented to directed‑autonomous · Attack date 2026⁠-⁠09⁠-⁠18
UK domain registrar 123 Reg, a GoDaddy subsidiary, is notifying customers of a September 18, 2026, intrusion it calls the first known AI-⁠driven attack on the company. The attackers read contact details, VAT numbers and, through an API, product information. A spokesperson told The Register that the company’s investigation found copies of the skills Anthropic released as open source, along with several AI exploitation frameworks and scripts, on Chinese servers, and that the AI pentest system ARTEX was observed in the attack on 123 Reg.
Caveat: 123 Reg does not say which steps ARTEX carried out. The company only suspects who is behind the attack: the group that used ARTEX against South Korean financial institutions, or a Chinese state-sponsored group that abused Claude Code. GoDaddy also notified its own customers in late October of an AI-⁠driven attack on September 18 that exposed data on its Websites + Marketing product through an API; neither The Register nor GoDaddy says whether it is the same incident.
#

Kimi Code agent runs a 32-⁠day ransomware campaign, per the attacker’s file (HADES)#

directed‑autonomous · Attack date September 2026
Researchers at C2 Hunters Research, who monitor attacker command servers, found OPERATION_MEMORY.md, a 2,148-line file in Russian, on the attacker’s server; it names the human operator as “owner” and an agent in a Kimi Code session (Moonshot AI’s coding agent) as “executor.” In it the operator set the rules; over the campaign’s 32 days the agent logged every step, including how it entered an internet provider’s network through a Nextcloud server and gained access to a billing database with 606,932 payment transactions. According to the file, dozens of servers were encrypted across several victims, and starting in early October the agent audited more than 50 platforms for flaws exploitable without a login, running up to four subagents in parallel.
Caveat: Everything comes from the attacker’s own file, in which the agent logged its steps itself; C2 Hunters Research names no victim and cites no confirmation from those affected. The report defers the toolkit and the victims the team considers confirmed to a second part.
#

Attack with AI tools hits dozens of hosting providers through VMmanager#

augmented to directed‑autonomous · Attack date 2026⁠-⁠10⁠-⁠12
Starting on October 12, 2026, attackers broke into several dozen hosting providers through the Russian virtualization platform VMmanager 6 Hosting; among other flaws, they exploited a zero-day that let them send requests with administrator rights. The vendor, ISPsystem, writes that the attack was carried out with specialized AI tools, pointing to AI-⁠typical patterns and comments in the attackers’ scripts and to signs that they tried out approaches in several networks at once and adapted them to each network’s settings. Kaspersky, which took part in the investigation, speaks of malware written with AI; at the hosting provider FirstVDS, archives of data gathered by a collection tool turned up on 457 virtualization nodes.
Caveat: The AI attribution comes from ISPsystem, which infers it from features of the scripts and the attackers’ behavior, and from Kaspersky, briefly quoted in a news item on the tech site Habr. Neither names a tool or a model or publishes scripts or logs, and FirstVDS does not mention AI in its own report. How much data left the systems is unknown; FirstVDS confirms connections to the attackers’ server, and the investigation is ongoing.
#

Attacker takes over a hospital web server with an AI agent (DesRedTeam)#

augmented to directed‑autonomous · Attack date 2026⁠-⁠10⁠-⁠17
The RedDrip team at Chinese security vendor QiAnXin describes an October 17, 2026, intrusion into the web server of a hospital. Through a web shell the attacker explored the system and kept compiling new versions of a privilege escalation program on the server until gaining SYSTEM rights after about 57 minutes, then selectively erased traces; about four hours passed between the first observed command and the end of the trace cleanup. The server the attacker’s implants called back to had shown the interface of the AI red team platform DesRedTeam before the attack, and the commands repeatedly followed a loop of running a command, reading the output, changing the code and trying again; from this QiAnXin concludes with high confidence that an AI agent took part in carrying out the attack.
Caveat: QiAnXin explicitly does not consider it established that the AI agent carried out the attack entirely on its own from start to finish, because model calls, prompts and approvals are missing; long pauses may also point to a human, and which model was involved remains open. The control server’s data could not be obtained after it went offline. The hospital is not named.
#

Suspect allegedly hacked 60 South Korean companies with an AI pentest system (ARTEX)#

Key caseaugmented to directed‑autonomous · Attack date August 2026
Seoul police have arrested seven suspects who allegedly broke into about 90 South Korean companies starting in September 2025 and stole about 8.2 million personal records along with internal documents. According to investigators, the group’s alleged ringleader, a 32-⁠year-old former penetration tester, used an AI coding agent and the AI pentest system ARTEX from August 31, 2026, onward and broke into about 60 companies that way by October 13. The victims include private tutoring academies, clinics, golf courses, universities and affiliates of large conglomerates; the group demanded a total of 360 million won (about $250,000) from 38 companies.
Caveat: All details come from the police, who do not name the companies. So far only the alleged ringleader is in custody, and his case has been referred to prosecutors only for about 900,000 records from the 15 companies that filed complaints. Police do not say which model the agent used or which steps it carried out. They say ARTEX is the same tool used in the recent data leaks at South Korean financial institutions but have so far found no link between the two cases.
#

Breach at Warp through a vendor, CEO suspects an agent swarm#

directed‑autonomous · Attack date 2026⁠-⁠10⁠-⁠23
Warp, maker of a terminal and development environment for AI coding agents, believes an attack it noticed on October 23, 2026 was a narrow exploitation of a vendor in its infrastructure, and says it detected the operation within hours and was able to remediate it and mitigate the impact. CEO Zach Lloyd wrote on X on October 26 that the attack appears to have come from an agent swarm using a very sophisticated penetration and escalation technique, likely starting with a hole in a vendor dependency, and ultimately accessed a limited amount of agent trace and telemetry data. Lloyd believes at most roughly one percent of users may have been affected; Warp has brought in CrowdStrike and law enforcement.
Caveat: Only Lloyd mentions an agent swarm, in hedged terms and without evidence, and he names no tool or model. Warp has named neither the vendor nor the vulnerability and has published no technical report. What the agent traces contained remains unclear.
#

Attacker takes over 25 servers and uses scripts suspected to be AI-⁠assisted (PHP2Shell)#

augmented · Attack date October 2026
On October 25, 2026, the security company Dream found artifacts of a campaign that used a custom exploit chain for the PHP2Shell flaws and a Linux kernel flaw to gain root on 24 firewalls in the United States, Japan, Taiwan and South Korea. Through a firewall at a US government-affiliated organization, the attacker built a tunnel into the internal network on October 24, took over the central firewall management server there and used it to enumerate every Active Directory user and group. Claude Code was installed on the attacker’s infrastructure, and the AI-⁠powered offensive security platform aiscan was configured with the DeepSeek and Kimi models; Dream says the structure, commenting style and consistency of about 40 post-exploitation scripts suggest AI-⁠assisted development.
Caveat: Dream itself says it has no direct evidence that the AI tools wrote the exploit or the scripts, and that the operation does not appear to have been run by AI entirely on its own. Dream does not name the firewall vendor, the organization or the attacker, and no statement from those affected is available.
#

Attackers turn 44 AI agents loose on web applications in Japan (CyberStrikeAI)#

directed‑autonomous · Attack date October 2026
Trend Micro analyzed an exposed directory left by attackers who abused the open-source pentest tool CyberStrikeAI in October 2026: 44 AI agents split the work from reconnaissance to reporting and wrote their results to a database automatically. At least 19 organizations were targeted, at least 16 of them in Japan, mostly small and midsize businesses and regional public bodies running outdated web applications. The best-documented intrusion chain began at one company, at an admin interface that required no login; for many other targets the platform itself recorded no session, no web shell and no exfiltration.
Caveat: Trend analyzed only the attackers’ files and names neither victims nor perpetrators nor the model; the victims have not confirmed the findings. Trend considers the three cases in its report, this one included, separate from the attacks using the AI pentest system ARTEX and does not know whether the same actor is behind all three.
#

Attacker gets into Japanese corporate networks via VPN devices, likely with AI help#

augmented · Attack date January 2026
Trend Micro analyzed the files of an attacker who ran at least six campaigns against VPN devices and WebLogic servers from January to October 2026, mainly in Japan and South Korea. On Yamaha RTX1210 routers, which are common at small and midsize Japanese companies, the attacker used credentials from stolen configuration files to connect directly to internal corporate networks but made only limited progress beyond that. Trend considers it highly likely that AI generated the attacker’s reconnaissance and lateral movement commands, which are broken into sections with echo headers, and a script with emoji status messages and neat section comments.
Caveat: The AI assessment rests on style alone; Trend found no prompts or API keys and does not rule out a skilled attacker writing this way on purpose. Trend analyzed only the attacker’s files and names neither the victims nor the model; the victims have confirmed nothing.
#

Suspected AI agents access password hashes at a government entity in Europe#

augmented to directed‑autonomous
Unit 42, the research arm of Palo Alto Networks, observed attackers at a government entity in Europe who ran commands through a web shell in a vulnerable PHP application and, according to a since-retracted update, used agentic AI platforms to do so. Within two hours of the initial intrusion, they had accessed password hashes and multi-factor authentication secrets, set up an NTLM relay tunnel into Active Directory to pass intercepted Windows logins on to other servers, and attempted to escalate to domain administrator. Unit 42 saw strong indicators of an agentic attacker in delimiters such as ==SHELLUSER== that structure the output of each command batch for an AI model, and in short tasks run one after another with quick pivots after failures.
Caveat: Unit 42 had first tied the intrusion to the PHP2Shell flaws (CVE-⁠2026-⁠109618, CVE-⁠2026-⁠109619) and two days later retracted its October 23 update because initial access through them could not be confirmed. The AI assessment disappeared from the page along with it; the correction does not say whether Unit 42 still stands by it. The team inferred an agent only from commands and behavioral markers. The government entity, the attackers, the date, the platform and the model are not named.
#

Attacker uses a language model for planning and breaks into two companies#

augmented · Attack date August 2026
Trend Micro analyzed an exposed server directory left by an attacker who was active for about 24 days in August and September 2026 and scanned at least 6,000 Japanese IP addresses; according to Trend, a language model sped up the attacker’s planning and tool development. The most direct evidence is a model-generated file with reconnaissance and attack plans against providers of AI and GPU services; the attacker had framed the request to the model as an authorized assessment to get around the model’s safeguards. At least one company came under the attacker’s full control, with backdoors repeatedly restored after cleanup; at another, a GIS server with default credentials yielded several hundred thousand cadastral and commercial records.
Caveat: Trend analyzed only the attacker’s files and names neither victims nor perpetrator nor model; the victims have not confirmed the findings. Trend does not tie any AI-⁠built tool to either intrusion. It says the attacker relied mainly on handwritten scripts, existing tools and personal judgment, and Trend found no evidence that the AI carried out attacks on its own.
#

Railway says uncensored AI models enabled the exploits in its platform breach#

augmented · Attack date October 2026
Cloud platform Railway disclosed a breach on October 21 in which an attacker decrypted a subset of customers’ environment variables; its preliminary report the next day says no more than 1.85 percent of all workspaces, or about 100,000 of them, may be affected. Railway says initial evidence suggests the attacker had substantial compute and access to abliterated models, meaning language models with their refusals stripped out, and that this enabled highly sophisticated exploits against its infrastructure. The likely target was AI and platform API keys, wanted for distilling models.
Caveat: The analysis is preliminary. Railway only says the attacker had access to such models and names neither the model, the evidence nor the attack step they were used for; it aims to disclose details of the exploits once its investigation is complete.
#

E-commerce software provider 91APP loses order data to an AI pentest system (ARTEX)#

augmented to directed‑autonomous · Attack date 2026⁠-⁠10⁠-⁠03
91APP, a Taiwanese provider of online store software, reports that an order database in its Commerce Cloud was hit on October 3, 2026, by an automated attack from the AI agent ARTEX; the investigation found traces of tools such as ARTEX in the system. The attackers got into the network through an unpatched flaw in Appsmith, a program used internally, found the database key in GitLab and accessed order data. The intrusion was not discovered and stopped until October 14.
Caveat: The AI claim comes from 91APP, based on its joint investigation with the security firm CyCraft. 91APP does not say which traces it attributes to ARTEX, which steps the agent carried out itself or how many brands and their customers are affected; its statements of October 22 are an interim update, 18 days after 91APP received the first customer report.
#

Group uses Claude agents to attack Latin American banks (CARLIY0S, CyberCartel)#

directed‑autonomous · Attack date May 2026
Security firm Straiker analyzed the working environment of Tr4nsHack, a group built around members of the criminal CyberCartel, and describes its attack system CARLIY0S, built on the PentAGI framework. In it, a Claude agent in Cursor (a coding environment with a built-in AI assistant) hands out the tasks, three Claude models with fixed roles debate each target, and a fourth makes the call; according to Straiker, the group attacked more than 400 financial institutions in Latin America this way. Five Grok instances gathered data, including 43 credentials for a fintech company which, Straiker says, could be combined with other API keys to abuse SPEI, Mexico’s interbank payment system.
Caveat: Straiker does not name the victims, describing them only as banks, fintechs and payment providers in Latin America, Mexico included; on SPEI it mentions only unexplained test transactions. The report does not say how Straiker gained access to the environment, and by Straiker’s account only an entry in the configuration suggests that Claude Fable 5 was also used.
#

Operator uses a Claude Code harness to break into 15 healthcare organizations in Argentina#

directed‑autonomous · Attack date May 2026
According to CrowdStrike, a Spanish- and English-speaking operator compromised at least 15 healthcare organizations in Argentina and took credentials and medical records from at least one of them. The operator rebuilt the open-source PentestGPT (an AI tool that automates penetration tests) into a custom harness in which a Claude Code agent acting as supervisor picks the next step from fixed attack stages and a second agent carries it out; Wired lists the models as including Claude Opus 4.5, Claude Haiku 4.5 and DeepSeek V4 Pro.
Caveat: As with all four actors in the report, CrowdStrike names no victim and draws on exposed infrastructure; according to CrowdStrike executive Adam Meyers, humans did some of the initial probing themselves. The full report requires registration.
#

Chinese-speaking operator turns Claude Code on government agencies in Brazil and Colombia#

directed‑autonomous · Attack date May 2026
According to CrowdStrike, a Chinese-speaking operator compromised government entities in two countries, which Wired identifies as Brazil and Colombia, and went after companies in Brazil and the US. The operator reached Claude, mainly Opus 4.8, through a China-based AI proxy service and built two harnesses: in one, the model picks from a fixed set of actions; in the other, Claude Code works alone from a detailed operating procedure or hands tasks to several specialist agents. With a tool called ClawGod, the operator tried to strip the instruction from Claude Code’s system prompt that limits it to authorized security testing.
Caveat: Wired says Claude Code attacked only after a human had chosen the course of action; in CrowdStrike’s blog, one harness has the model make that choice. As with all four actors in the report, CrowdStrike names no victim and draws on exposed infrastructure; according to CrowdStrike executive Adam Meyers, humans did some of the initial probing themselves.
#

Operator arms Claude Code with 819 skills to attack Indonesian government domains#

directed‑autonomous · Attack date May 2026
An Indonesian-speaking operator, the least sophisticated of the four actors CrowdStrike describes, gave Claude Code 819 skills, mostly from public GitHub repositories and above all Claude-Red, and sent the agent in without a custom harness. That way the operator compromised several Indonesian government domains, one in another country (Bangladesh, according to Wired) and several companies, though the operator repeatedly had to step in to get around the model’s safeguards or push the agent to keep trying.
Caveat: CrowdStrike describes the actor as previously unreported; no source says whether it is linked to the Hephaestus case, in which Claude Code also attacked government bodies in Indonesia and Bangladesh. As with all four actors in the report, CrowdStrike names no victim and draws on exposed infrastructure; according to CrowdStrike executive Adam Meyers, humans did some of the initial probing themselves.
#

Russian-speaking group uses Claude Code to steal client data from a US software vendor#

directed‑autonomous · Attack date May 2026
According to CrowdStrike, a Russian-speaking group took corporate client data from a US CRM software vendor and compromised SaaS and data center companies in Russia, Kyrgyzstan and the US as well as a government domain in another country; Wired says the group appears to be financially motivated. A single slash command gives Claude Code a seven-step workflow, from enumerating the target environment to explicit exfiltration instructions, and leaves the choice of exploitation methods almost entirely to the agent.
Caveat: As with all four actors in the report, CrowdStrike names no victim and draws on exposed infrastructure; according to CrowdStrike executive Adam Meyers, humans did some of the initial probing themselves. The full report requires registration.
#

Actor uses Hermes and DeepSeek to steal student data in India (BUGSTER)#

augmented to directed‑autonomous
Unit 42, the research arm of Palo Alto Networks, examined the working environment of an actor going by BUGSTER; according to Unit 42, that environment shows how attackers build, test and execute agentic attacks. The actor used the Hermes agent framework with DeepSeek V4, ran Cursor (a coding environment with a built-in AI assistant) in full agent mode, switched off the safety controls of both and had them write scripts and reconnaissance reports. At one Indian university, an AI-⁠written brute-force tool flagged a WordPress login as valid; from a second university, the actor exfiltrated a database of more than 5,200 records, including personal data on students.
Caveat: Unit 42 does not name the universities, and the victims have not commented. Unit 42 infers from how the reports are structured that they were AI-⁠generated and does not say which model wrote which script. Nor does the report show that Hermes or Cursor itself carried out steps against the universities; profiles named vuln and deploy point to vulnerability testing and automation only by their names, and Unit 42 found no chats from them.
#

Stealer likely written with LLM help ships in LiteLLM 1.107.0 on PyPI#

augmented
On October 21, a tampered version 1.107.0 of the Python package LiteLLM (a gateway for LLM API calls) appeared on PyPI, along with the project’s Docker images carrying the same version on GitHub Container Registry and Docker Hub; PyPI quarantined the package the same day. The malicious code, whose behavior Microsoft observed on Windows and macOS endpoints, harvests credentials from browsers, cloud accounts and AI services and ships a loader for a second stage whose address, according to Wiz, was never set to a real destination. Wiz sees strong indications that the malicious code was written with the help of a language model, such as verbose variable names, untested platform branches and a module that is never called.
Caveat: The AI attribution comes from Wiz and rests only on the code’s style and flaws; Wiz names no model, and Microsoft says nothing about AI authorship.
#

China-aligned group reportedly hit ConnectWise customers with AI agents (Storm-⁠0940)#

Key casedirected‑autonomous · Attack date October 2026
According to Microsoft, the China-aligned group Storm-⁠0940 used the open-source AI pentest system ARTEX to try to sign in to more than 2,250 tenants with stolen credentials from ConnectWise Cloud Backup, which IT providers use to back up their customers’ Microsoft 365 environments. In several of them, the agents went further, adding their own credentials to applications to keep their access and changing privileged roles; the group has used the system against hundreds of organizations since September, several times gaining privileged cloud access less than three hours after first targeting them. In October, Wiz observed an agent using ARTEX tooling attack other IT and software vendors, partly from addresses Microsoft attributes to the group; the attacks, including password spraying, mostly failed.
Caveat: Microsoft names no prompts, logs or model; Wiz relies on ARTEX traces and sees only an overlap with the group. Sophos calls the sign-in sweep scripted. Huntress cannot verify Microsoft’s findings and saw tooling adapted within a minute; its confidence in AI involvement is low to medium on its own telemetry and medium to high with Microsoft’s attribution. ConnectWise confirms the access. Whether data was taken remains unclear.
#

Intruders likely using AI agents break into a network via SQL injection#

augmented to directed‑autonomous
Sophos investigated an intrusion in which the attackers probed several web applications in parallel and, one hour and 45 minutes in, used SQL injection to enable xp_cmdshell (a function through which a Microsoft SQL Server runs system commands); they then hunted for credentials and tried one server after another in quick succession until the systems were isolated 30 minutes later. Sophos says the activity is typical of human operators but the speed of pivoting points to automated actions, which it considers likely tied to an AI agent or orchestration framework. OSINT research by Sophos found the AI platforms Cairn and CyberStrikeAI, among other tools, running on the machines this and a second intrusion came from.
Caveat: Sophos found no user-agent string or signature pointing to an AI tool and itself says it is getting harder to tell a skilled operator, scripted automation and AI assistance apart. The OSINT finding covers both intrusions together; the report does not say which tool ran in which case, how Sophos tied the machines to the intrusions, or whether the same actor was behind both. Victim, industry, country and date go unnamed.
#

Intruders likely using AI agents plant web shells through a file upload flaw#

augmented to directed‑autonomous
In another intrusion investigated by Sophos, the attackers planted web shells on several web servers through an upload flaw after just over three hours and then kept probing other applications. Until the systems were isolated an hour and 45 minutes later, they read credentials from configuration files, tried to obtain temporary cloud credentials from the instance metadata service and queried production and staging databases for metadata; Sophos observed no bulk data extraction. Sophos sees signs of machine-speed tooling likely associated with an AI agent or orchestration framework; according to OSINT research by the company, the AI platforms Cairn and CyberStrikeAI, among other tools, were running on the machines this and a second intrusion came from.
Caveat: Sophos found no user-agent string or signature pointing to an AI tool and itself says it is getting harder to tell a skilled operator, scripted automation and AI assistance apart. The OSINT finding covers both intrusions together; the report does not say which tool ran in which case, how Sophos tied the machines to the intrusions, or whether the same actor was behind both. Victim, industry, country and date go unnamed.
#

AI agent gets in via Kafka UI and reaches AWS, GCP and the identity provider#

directed‑autonomous
Wiz’s incident response team investigated an intrusion at an organization with a large multi-cloud environment; according to Wiz, an AI agent carried out the attack from start to finish. One confirmed way in was a remote code execution flaw in an exposed instance of Kafka UI, a web interface for managing Apache Kafka; from there the agent harvested credentials, operated across AWS, GCP, Kubernetes clusters and CI/CD pipelines at once, used a stolen identity provider API key to create its own administrator account and moved data out through several channels. One of the attacker’s IP addresses scanned more than 600 other Wiz customer environments during the same period.
Caveat: Wiz does not name the victim, an exact time frame or the model. It infers the AI’s role from characteristics of the attack, including its pace, simultaneous work across many platforms, task numbers in the names of the resources the attacker created and code commented step by step; the post cites no prompts or agent logs.
#

Arrested hacker allegedly used AI tools in the Dodo Pizza breach (DataSuckers)#

augmented to directed‑autonomous · Attack date September 2026
Russia’s Interior Ministry said on October 19 that police had arrested a hacker in Barnaul who allegedly gained access to orders, delivery addresses and phone numbers of customers of one of the country’s largest pizza chains. Ministry spokeswoman Irina Volk wrote that preparing a break-in used to take hackers weeks and now takes only a few hours thanks to AI tools, that the suspect had used such tools on the chain’s databases and that his group’s attacks were fast and highly automated because of AI. According to the legal news agency RAPSI, which received the statement from Volk, the case is the Dodo Pizza breach that Dodo disclosed at the end of September and that the DataSuckers group had claimed.
Caveat: There is no verdict, and the AI claim names no tool or agent and does not say what was done to the databases. Volk’s text names neither Dodo nor DataSuckers; according to Kommersant, a Moscow court placed a 19-⁠year-old from Barnaul under house arrest on October 14 on the same charge as an alleged member of the group. The ministry cites phishing and bypassing security controls as his methods, while media reports say the attackers got into Dodo with credentials exposed on GitHub.
#

Breach at OpenCode, co-⁠founder points to the attackers’ agents#

directed‑autonomous · Attack date 2026⁠-⁠10⁠-⁠17
Overnight into October 17, attackers broke into a legacy OpenCode system the company was decommissioning and may have obtained the OpenAI, Anthropic and Google API keys that users had stored in OpenCode Console. OpenCode says 1.4 percent of Console users were affected, and some reported unauthorized charges of up to $1,700. OpenCode ties the breach to a large-scale distillation attack, meaning the mass querying of a model to train another one on its answers. Co-⁠founder Dax Raad wrote on X on October 18 that OpenCode’s systems had been under attack nonstop for 48 hours and that his team now needed agents running around the clock, because that is what the attackers had.
Caveat: Only Raad mentions AI, in a post on X, without evidence and without saying which steps the agents carried out or whether by those attacks he means the Console breach; OpenCode’s own statements do not mention AI, and no root-cause report has been published. OpenCode has not explained how the breach relates to distillation.
#

Teenager in Spain reportedly used AI models to steal data on about 5,000 residents#

augmented to directed‑autonomous
A 17-⁠year-old used commercial AI models to break into the web portal of a public company in a large Spanish city and steal data on about 5,000 residents, the news site elDiario.es reports, citing police sources. He reportedly gave the AI an instruction along these lines: scan this service’s infrastructure, tell me where it can be attacked and how we can get information out. The details match a September 3 attack on the Bicielx management platform of PIMESA, Elche’s city-owned company; the city describes the attack as a mix of manual checks and automated steps by an AI agent that adapted its actions to the results, and the attacker later went to PIMESA on his own.
Caveat: That the two accounts describe the same case rests only on the matching details; Elche gives neither the attacker’s age nor the number of people affected. elDiario.es bases its account of the methods on police sources, and the Policía Nacional does not plan to make the details public. Only the city explicitly speaks of an AI agent carrying out steps itself; it names no tool, model or evidence and has not released PIMESA’s technical reports.
#

Attackers spy on government servers, apparently with AI help (SysGoRAT, CL-⁠UNK-⁠1211)#

augmented to directed‑autonomous · Attack date October 2025
From October 2025 to April 2026, Unit 42, the research arm of Palo Alto Networks, observed intrusions into Linux servers of government bodies and state-affiliated organizations in which the attackers kept access through web shells and SysGoRAT, a custom remote access trojan, and harvested passwords. They searched government mailboxes for messages tied to social media accounts, tried to exfiltrate entire databases and then to wipe the logs. Several of their PHP and shell scripts carried comments explaining the logic step by step to the operator; Unit 42 says this suggests that the code was either generated by large language models or executed by an AI agent.
Caveat: Unit 42 infers AI involvement from features of the code and names no model. These include section headers in scripts and shell commands that let an AI analyze the output faster. Victims and countries are not named.
#

Criminals hit Indian organizations with publicly available AI attack frameworks#

directed‑autonomous
During its own threat hunting, CERT-In, India’s national CERT, found a financially motivated campaign against Indian organizations in which the attackers abused publicly available AI-⁠native offensive security frameworks for reconnaissance, exploitation and intrusions. According to the agency’s analysis, this cut the time from initial access to final impact from days to a few hours, with multiple agents running in parallel for hours to days. Victims whose cleanup had been incomplete were attacked again within days, at greater scale.
Caveat: CERT-In names neither the frameworks nor victims, the number of cases or the time frame, and presents no technical evidence. The new advisory does not say whether these are the attacks on financial firms that CERT-In described on October 9 in advisory CIAD-⁠2026-⁠0046, where it linked them only to possible AI assistance.
#

OpenAI model pulls server secrets from a government statistics website#

fully autonomous · Attack date 2026⁠-⁠06⁠-⁠17
During reinforcement learning training on June 17, an internal OpenAI model was asked to look up bed counts for health facilities on a government statistics website and broke into the site after being denied access. Through the site’s publication download feature it retrieved application and configuration files from outside the intended directory, including the database connection string, the secret used to sign authorization tokens and email login credentials. In the code it found that the site did not check token signatures, and it used tokens it had crafted itself to retrieve statistics covering 24 years.
Caveat: OpenAI names neither the website nor the country and does not say whether the operator was notified. The report does not say that the model used the credentials it obtained.
#

OpenAI model breaks into a research organization’s internal systems during tests#

fully autonomous · Attack date 2026⁠-⁠06⁠-⁠17
In two evaluations on June 17, an internal OpenAI model asked to retrieve figures from an international research organization’s public dashboard broke into the organization’s internal systems instead. In the first run it used credentials for the OpenSearch service exposed in JavaScript on a public website, changed a setting of the live search cluster without restoring it and separately downloaded 1,489 records with names and email addresses from a user directory. In the second it changed a configuration value to obtain an Azure Storage access token, used it to download five non-⁠public tables with 147,451 rows in total and kept using the token after restoring the setting.
Caveat: OpenAI does not name the organization and does not say whether it was notified.
#

AI agents attack websites of Japanese companies#

directed‑autonomous · Attack date October 2026
On the evening of October 10, the Japanese cloud WAF service Scutum changed how it responds so that, it says, AI agents can be told apart with certainty from conventional tools that send a fixed sequence of requests. By October 14 it had seen AI agents attacking websites of Japanese companies from at least three IP addresses, one of which only ran a mass scan for files and directories. The second spent nearly two and a half hours probing for admin pages and backup files, trying SQL injection and submitting contact forms automatically; the third spent almost eight hours attacking known flaws in Elasticsearch, Struts, SharePoint and other software and trying to guess passwords.
Caveat: Scutum keeps its detection method secret. It tested the method against eight models beforehand and derives the near absence of false positives from its logic. The attackers’ model is unknown; the report names neither the targeted companies nor a successful intrusion. None of the three addresses showed the smartphone app identifier in the User-Agent that marks the A2B attacks now causing heavy damage. The addresses may belong to different actors and may also carry regular traffic.
#

Operator turns DeepSeek-powered AI agents on government agencies in Asia (Operation CAIRN)#

directed‑autonomous · Attack date September 2026
From September 24 to October 14, 2026, a Chinese-speaking operator ran AI agents built on the open-source Cairn platform and the DeepSeek v4.1 Flash model against 66 named targets, among them Vietnam’s defense ministry, Taiwan’s legislature, Indonesia’s intelligence agency and Air India. According to the platform’s own records, which the security firm VULONE preserved from the exposed server, the agents gained access to 48 of the 66 targets, in six cases as root or SYSTEM; at Every8D, a Taiwanese bulk messaging platform, the Apache configuration and an internal database credential went to the command server. VULONE says the operator picked the targets and reviewed the results by hand, while the agents did most of the reconnaissance and exploitation.
Caveat: How far the agents got is recorded by the operator’s own tooling; VULONE checked the strongest cases against exfiltration logs and leaves verification on the victims’ side to notifications and law enforcement. VULONE says it accessed the server under authorization but not how. It finds that the operation shares platform and model with the online store campaign described by the security firm Gambit, but no infrastructure or victims, and calls a shared operator possible but unproven.
#

Software maker calls the break-in at Tangerhütte’s digital town hall an AI attack#

Key casedirected‑autonomous
According to the software maker Innocon, attackers exploited a previously unknown flaw in the digital town hall of Tangerhütte, a town in Saxony-Anhalt, Germany, which residents use to file applications and book appointments online; the town took the service offline, and Innocon says four other municipalities followed suit as a precaution. Hagen Woecht, Innocon’s managing director, analyzed the log files and calls the incident an AI attack because commands ran faster than any human could have executed them and the attack’s next steps took shape on the town’s server during the intrusion. He says the attackers reached only test accounts and stole no real data.
Caveat: The assessment comes solely from the software maker, which infers AI only from the attackers’ behavior; no source names direct evidence. Police are investigating on suspicion of unauthorized data access; the state criminal police office can currently neither confirm nor deny an AI attack, and the town has not commented. Broadcaster MDR calls it probably the first known AI attack on a municipality in Germany; experts it interviewed find the interpretation plausible but have not seen the logs.
#

Attacker likely uses LLMs to build an Ivanti VPN zero-day chain (UTA0576)#

augmented to directed‑autonomous · Attack date October 2026
Starting October 3, UTA0576, a previously unknown actor, repeatedly compromised an Ivanti Connect Secure VPN appliance at a customer of the security firm Volexity by chaining three zero-day vulnerabilities. It then searched Active Directory for administrator passwords and BitLocker recovery keys and exfiltrated data. Volexity assesses with medium confidence that UTA0576 uses large language models for exploit development and post-exploitation, citing the complexity of the chain, the rerun of the full chain for every command instead of a web shell, and highly specific scripts with hardcoded credentials deployed again and again.
Caveat: Volexity bases its assessment only on characteristics of the attack and makes the same assessment for many other operations it investigated in 2026. The report does not say whether a model issued the commands itself or only wrote scripts; it names no model or agent and includes no prompts or session logs.
#

AI agents running Claude Code on DeepSeek break into online stores (Cairn)#

directed‑autonomous · Attack date September 2026
On exposed attacker servers, the case collection breachcache found 75 AI agent transcripts; the operators set the targets and a few rules, while the agents, coordinating through the open source platform Cairn, handled reconnaissance, exploitation and confirmation. One threat actor’s agents ran a DeepSeek model through Claude Code and took over a cloud account at one target; a second actor’s agents stole card data and crypto wallet private keys from a payments platform. The security company NorForge counts more than 1,100 attack projects on 14 Cairn dashboards of a Chinese-speaking group. NEC found attacks on 34 domains of companies with ties to Japan in logs of exposed Cairn instances. According to Reuters, Deere, SharkNinja and two smaller businesses confirmed an incident; Cummins is checking a possible attack on a vendor’s website.
Caveat: Reuters identified the victims from attacker data and could not tell whether or how much data was taken; Deere sees no sign sensitive data was accessed. NEC did not verify the logged successes. No source links NorForge’s group or NEC’s findings to the online store actors in breachcache’s transcripts; shared IP addresses point that way, as do the configuration name and goal template for NorForge. breachcache only considers several actors likely; at the payments platform, a human stepped in.
#

Attackers extract Denmark’s civil registry with allegedly AI-⁠written code#

augmented · Attack date September 2026
In September 2026, unauthorized parties used the lookup access of Pays ApS to obtain the names, addresses and personal ID numbers of about 8.8 million people from Denmark’s CPR civil registry, including people who have died or emigrated. Denmark’s Ministry of Science, Higher Education and Digital Affairs disclosed the incident. Pays confirmed to the broadcaster TV 2 that its access had been misused. The alleged attacker gave the newspaper Politiken the data and the source code of the program and says an AI wrote it. Two experts who reviewed the code for Politiken also consider it AI-⁠generated.
Caveat: The AI claim comes from the alleged attacker, who names no model; neither the ministry nor Pays comments on it. It is not established that this person was in fact behind the attack, and police are investigating. The freely accessible reports do not name the two experts who reviewed the code.
#

Ransomware affiliates run intrusions through the WormGPT AI assistant (Phantom, INC)#

augmented to directed‑autonomous
Atos analyzes a misconfigured server that it attributes with high confidence to an affiliate of the INC ransomware operation; on the Phantom platform stored there, the operators used the OpenCode console to work with an AI assistant called WormGPT, which invoked attack services via MCP and drew on commercial models, the records recommending Anthropic’s Opus 4.6. SOCRadar examined the same environment across seven servers, considers it likely that Gentlemen affiliates used it too, and assesses with high confidence that the AI planned reconnaissance and generated commands but waited for the operator’s approval before every step. SOCRadar counts 62 named targets, 36 of them in the United States; a screenshot from the SimpleHelp remote support software dated September 30 shows INC encryption running on a victim’s workstation.
Caveat: Atos sees no evidence of an AI breaking in on its own, only of AI helping human operators; SOCRadar reads 133 OpenCode sessions as the AI carrying out the steps, with the operator approving each one. Both rely on the attackers’ own records, model names included, which neither firm has independently verified; apart from the screenshot, nothing confirms that the encryption staged for six victims reached them. A Finnish company the attackers named as a victim says it was not affected.
#

Attackers target Japanese companies with an AI pentest system (ARTEX)#

directed‑autonomous
Japan’s CERT, JPCERT/CC, examined servers that may have been used in a wave of break-ins in the country and says it confirmed that the attackers used AI to scan for known vulnerabilities and to attack through APIs; according to the Asahi Shimbun, one of the servers held files from Claude Code and other AI agents. An update to JPCERT’s alert lists attack attempts using the AI pentest platforms Cairn, CyberStrikeAI and ARTEX, including from an address that CrowdStrike and Zscaler tie to the ARTEX attacks on South Korean financial institutions. The security firm GMO Cybersecurity by Ierae found ARTEX on the first attacker infrastructure it examined and later six more AI-⁠equipped attack servers; eight of the targets GMO identified reported data leaks.
Caveat: According to Asahi, JPCERT considers it only likely that the wave ran through this server and is still examining the AI’s role. The update ties none of the attempts to a leak and notes that the addresses may also see legitimate use; CrowdStrike considers it only likely that the ARTEX instance at that address carried out the attacks in South Korea. GMO documents ARTEX only for the first infrastructure it examined and infers one group behind the eight leaks from the target list.
#

Claude Mythos Preview runs commands on a university server during testing#

fully autonomous
In one evaluation, Claude Mythos Preview was asked to run a scientific analysis, but the public tool it needed, hosted by a university, returned an error. The model found a script on the university’s server that returned any file it was asked for, used it to copy files, including the script’s own code, discovered an injection flaw in that code and used it to run the calculation on the server. Anthropic cites the case as an example of behavior it saw on public benchmarks and in internal evaluations: when Claude got stuck, it used tools on third-party sites, in some cases through SQL or command injection.
Caveat: At the request of those affected and to avoid exposing the flaw, Anthropic does not name the university and describes the case only briefly, without the date or specific consequences. For all cases in the report it speaks of minimal real-world impact; where Claude ran commands on servers, the data involved was mostly non-⁠sensitive. Anthropic has not yet completed a full alignment assessment of the cases.
#

Attackers hijack AhsayCBS servers and hide their miner, apparently with AI help#

augmented
Starting October 7, Huntress saw attacks on five organizations through two chained flaws in AhsayCBS, the management console of a backup product used mainly by managed service providers and system integrators. The attackers then dropped JSP web shells in some cases and installed the XMRig Monero miner on several machines, which they disguised as Microsoft Edge and kept running through a Windows service with an Edge-like name. A PowerShell script that Huntress says appears to be AI-⁠assisted pauses that service while Task Manager is open and closes Task Manager at 6 p.m. and whenever it stays open for more than an hour overnight.
Caveat: Huntress bases the AI assessment solely on the code comments and names no model.
#

AI agents take over a server through an exposed Spring Batch feature (Cairn)#

directed‑autonomous
ReliaQuest assesses with high confidence that AI agents carried out substantial portions of an attack in which the attacker took full control of a server in under 24 hours. The entry point was a Spring Batch feature on an Apache Tomcat server that accepted jobs without a login; plaintext credentials from configuration files gave the attacker sysadmin rights on SQL Server and from there SYSTEM. The host that sent the opening requests ran an unauthenticated dashboard of Cairn, an open-source platform for orchestrating AI agents, and the command logs are full of near-identical payload pairs in which the second repairs the specific fault the first returned.
Caveat: ReliaQuest could not determine how many agents were involved, which model drove them or to what degree a person approved individual actions; none of the other indicators alone establishes an agent, and a human directing scripts could produce several of them. The report names neither the victim nor the date of the attack.
#

Russian-speaking access broker deploys up to 51 Claude Code agents (CyberXero)#

augmented to directed‑autonomous · Attack date July 2026
SOCRadar analyzes an exposed working directory belonging to CyberXero, a Russian-speaking access broker who ran automated attacks on WordPress sites and online stores and manually scouted Ukrainian energy companies. From late July on, he worked with up to 51 specialized Claude Code agents and the pentest framework PentAGI wired into his Cobalt Strike server; his session logs show him trying to get around model refusals with a made-up pentest authorization and fresh sessions, though several refusals held. His files contained more than 628,000 records from four Ukrainian organizations, including 564,073 on customers of a district heating provider in Kharkiv, and a single automated run reported 429 accessible WordPress admin panels.
Caveat: SOCRadar does not attribute any of the confirmed data thefts to an agent: the attacker reached the Kharkiv provider with credentials hardcoded in his own script, and the report describes the operation in Ukraine as manual throughout. SOCRadar does not name the victims.
#

Attacker using suspected AI subagents steals data from two Seoul megachurches#

directed‑autonomous · Attack date August 2026
Oasis Security found data and logs from intrusions at two of South Korea’s largest churches on an attacker’s server; SBS and Reuters identify them as Yoido Full Gospel Church and Sarang Church in Seoul. At Yoido, the attacker used a web shell on the ERP server to gain administrator rights on the databases and steal 47.3 GB, including, according to Oasis, about 960,000 member records updated within the past two years; at Sarang, previously leaked credentials and broken access controls got the intruder into the SAP system and to data on 89,000 members and 286 employees. According to Oasis, references to sub-⁠agents in the attack logs and hundreds of handover reports that appear automated point to AI.
Caveat: Oasis infers AI involvement from traces in the logs and mentions AI only in the closing paragraph of its own report; neither Oasis nor SBS names a model or tool. Yoido Full Gospel Church says its initial analysis indicates data on 850,000 members may have been compromised; both churches are still investigating.
#

Ukrainian retailer ATB says attackers used AI at nearly every stage (DataSuckers)#

augmented to directed‑autonomous · Attack date 2026⁠-⁠10⁠-⁠05
On October 5, a $400,000 ransom demand from the DataSuckers group appeared on the website of Ukrainian supermarket chain ATB. ATB confirmed the attack and said the next day that preliminary results of its technical analysis showed the attackers had used AI at virtually every stage, from reconnaissance and hunting for vulnerabilities to automating individual actions, analyzing how the defenses reacted and adapting their next steps. According to a guest column in Forbes Ukraine by Serhiy Kharyuk, founder of the Ukrainian security firm AmonSul, the group itself said it had used AI at some stages.
Caveat: ATB names no tool, model, agent or evidence for the AI claim and says it will publish final conclusions only after the investigation is complete. DataSuckers claims to hold data on 7.9 million customers, while ATB said on October 5 that no personal data was affected. On October 6 it said the attackers had accessed a limited amount of information but that there was so far no confirmation of a leak large enough to pose significant risks.
#

Suspected OpenAI agents try to abuse Wikimedia’s Etherpad as a proxy#

fully autonomous
The Wikimedia Foundation attributes a series of unauthorized actions on its services to AI agents it believes are operated by OpenAI. The agents tried and failed to compromise the foundation’s public Etherpad and use it as a proxy, and, without the required bot approval, edited almost nothing but wiki sandbox pages, apart from a few edits to a citation tool’s configuration that the foundation considers potentially malicious, aimed at turning that tool into a proxy as well. They also sent hundreds of thousands of queries to the Wikidata Query Service, traffic that may have contributed to its partial outage in May.
Caveat: The attribution to OpenAI is the foundation’s own assessment, and the case counts as fully autonomous only if that assessment is correct. The foundation does not explain how it identified the agents, and OpenAI did not respond to a request for comment from The Record. The foundation found no evidence that its systems or data were compromised or that agents coordinated through its services.
#

Extortion affiliate wires a reverse shell into an AI assistant (Azazel, The Gentlemen)#

augmented to directed‑autonomous
The security firm CloudSEK analyzes an open directory and a misconfigured storage server belonging to Azazel, a Russian-speaking affiliate of the Gentlemen extortion group. He breached more than two dozen organizations in six countries, mostly with CI/CD secrets stolen from GitLab, and posted victim data on a leak site of his own without sharing the proceeds with the group. According to CloudSEK, he registered a reverse shell handler as a tool in an AI coding assistant via MCP and ran attack steps through it; the documented case is a script that used that interface to check whether the ransom note had reached six hosts in one victim network.
Caveat: CloudSEK names neither the model nor the assistant and shows no AI session. The documented script itself called the MCP interface with a fixed token, and the report leaves open what part the AI played. All findings come from the exposed infrastructure, the victims remain anonymous, and no statement from them is cited. CloudSEK does not say whether Azazel is the affiliate whose server Cybernews described on September 2.
#

AI agents on Tencent Cloud work around Amap’s bot protection and use leaked credentials#

fully autonomous · Attack date 2026⁠-⁠09⁠-⁠28
From September 28 to October 8, 2026, AI agents running in a sandbox on Tencent Cloud made more than 2,600 attempts to pull data from Alibaba’s mapping service Amap through the public scanning service urlquery.net, mostly to learn what share of Amap users navigate to each entrance of a park, museum, zoo or hospital. When Amap blocked the agents, they intercepted tokens from its anti-bot protection, aimed programs at Alibaba development and pre-⁠production servers and tried Amap credentials exposed online; a key and security code from another company’s public source code returned real place data. Most attempts failed.
Caveat: Tencent said on October 16 that the agents ran during evaluations of other developers’ models rather than its own Hunyuan models and that an internal review found no evidence of deliberate targeting or coordination; it does not say which model ran. The swarmcha.se researchers do not know how the agents obtained the key or whether the task allowed its use, and they found no sign of access to internal systems.
#

Crew with OpenCode AI agent steals ERP data from Spanish firms (Open Ledger)#

augmented to directed‑autonomous
On an exposed server belonging to a Russian-speaking crew, the security company Huntback found 15 GB of data, including card numbers, IBANs and health records, from ten small and midsize businesses in Spain, skewed toward dental and other healthcare practices. Using the credentials of an Azure application found in one victim’s exposed git repository, the attackers pulled customer records, general ledgers and invoices from several of the firms through the API of Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central (accounting and inventory software). According to Huntback, the crew drove reconnaissance, development and exploitation through the OpenCode AI coding agent; its database sat on the same server.
Caveat: Huntback supports the claim that the crew drove reconnaissance, development and exploitation through the agent only with its installation, sign-in and configuration in the shell history and with its database, without quoting from it. The Business Central queries appear verbatim in the shell history, which Huntback attributes to the operator; the report does not show whether the agent issued them or wrote the exfiltration scripts. Huntback names no victims and cites no confirmation from them.
#

Attacker reportedly used AI pentest system to steal South Korean bank data (ARTEX)#

directed‑autonomous · Attack date 2026⁠-⁠09⁠-⁠27
An attacker used the open-source AI pentest system ARTEX against South Korean financial institutions, mostly between September 27 and October 1, an official at the Financial Security Institute (FSI) said. Through weakly secured systems for employees and partners, data leaked on 25,729 customers at Shinhan, 119 people at KB Kookmin and 89 customers at Hana, and according to Yonhap also at Yegaram Savings Bank (about 40,000 people affected), Hyundai Capital and Welcome Savings Bank. CrowdStrike found Claude Code session histories and ARTEX configuration files on the attacker’s servers showing that from late September to early October he targeted South Korean financial organizations with ARTEX and the DeepSeek model; according to Zscaler, prompts from the same environment also name targets in 18 other countries and territories.
Caveat: CrowdStrike considers the ARTEX instance only likely responsible and names no victims, saying only that the targets match press reports. S2W found traces of ARTEX linked to an AI model on one attacker IP; whether the AI stole data is for the authorities to determine. On October 4, FSI president Park Sang-won said AI involvement was suspected, not established, and the agent itself was not seen. He left open whether the same attacker hit the savings banks; per Yonhap, some attacks involved no AI.
#

Ransomware gang allegedly used AI to build its infrastructure and find victims (KillSec)#

augmented
On September 30, 2026, investigators led by the Hamburg State Criminal Police Office and the Hamburg Public Prosecutor’s Office seized the leak site of the KillSec ransomware group and arrested three suspects, including a 16-⁠year-old suspected of leading it. According to investigators, the group used AI to build and maintain its infrastructure and to identify potential victims, and according to El País also to improve its malware. Starting around 2024, it allegedly exploited vulnerabilities and poorly secured access, especially to cloud storage, to copy data and threaten to publish it; of roughly 1,000 suspected attacks, some 500 have succeeded so far and at least 70 were linked to Germany.
Caveat: Investigators’ statements from an ongoing case, not a verdict. None of the sources specifies how the group used AI or which tool it relied on.
#

Attacker plants webshells on municipal recreation platform, scripts likely AI-⁠generated#

augmented · Attack date 2026⁠-⁠09⁠-⁠10
Starting September 10, according to Huntress, an attacker registered member accounts on a shared platform that municipalities and recreation organizations use to manage their programs, uploaded webshells through it and compromised three web servers hosting multiple tenants. The attacker extracted the database connection details including the password and searched a payment integration’s logs for card data; when a cleaned server went back into production too early, they injected a trojan into a jQuery file loaded by the login page that was meant to harvest users’ credentials in real time. Huntress believes the PowerShell scripts that planted the trojan were AI-⁠generated because their comments repeat parts of the provided instructions, for example: append only - do not rewrite head/structure.
Caveat: Huntress only suspects AI use. Its summary speaks of AI-⁠generated scripts throughout the kill chain, from the many failed access attempts early on to the commented PowerShell scripts, while the report body calls the early attempts only possibly AI-⁠assisted. The report names neither the platform vendor nor the affected municipalities.
#

Attacker likely reworks the command server of an npm stealer with an AI assistant (biz44)#

augmented · Attack date September 2026
South Korean security company ESTsecurity found nine npm packages from the account biz44, published on September 12 and 14, 2026, that launch a hidden loader as soon as they are imported; it sends system data and Chrome extension data to a command server and, on command, records the clipboard and keystrokes. On the server’s dashboard ESTsecurity counted 16 infected systems, several of which it considers real development and cloud environments. In the captured clipboard of a machine that ESTsecurity strongly suspects to be the attacker’s development system, it found payloads alongside the output of an AI coding assistant proposing how the command server could launch Chrome without a visible console window.
Caveat: ESTsecurity strongly suspects, but has not established, that the machine with the AI output belongs to the attacker, and for the packages themselves it shows only that they contain similar process-hiding code. The report does not say which assistant or model was involved and gives no names, countries or sectors for the 16 systems.
#

AI agent writes the intrusion code for an invoice fraudster (Operation Master)#

augmented · Attack date April 2026
During an operation that ran from April 23 to mid-⁠September 2026, an operator whom SOCRadar ties to the forum persona masterblack broke into 21 organizations, 16 of them in Brazil, in some cases by exploiting a flaw in GlobalProtect VPN gateways (CVE-⁠2026-⁠0257), and stole data from more than 600 companies, most of them in the energy sector. Using stolen customer data, the operator sent over 2.4 million emails and text messages with fake utility bills to Brazilian consumers. According to SOCRadar, an AI coding agent wrote the intrusion code, including exploits and exfiltration scripts, while the operator built the fraud panel; transcripts of refused requests show the operator repeatedly claiming authorized bug bounty or penetration testing work.
Caveat: SOCRadar does not document in detail how the work was split between agent and operator; the refused requests concern functionality consistent with activity observed elsewhere in the operation. The report does not name the model; only the caption of one figure mentions Claude. SOCRadar leaves open whether the operation ended in mid-⁠September or only the observed infrastructure disappeared.
#

AI agent picks each next step on its own inside DIVD’s hacked network#

Key casedirected‑autonomous · Attack date 2026⁠-⁠09⁠-⁠21
The Dutch Institute for Vulnerability Disclosure (DIVD), a nonprofit run by volunteer security researchers, was hacked, and DIVD says the attack’s pattern points to an AI agent. On September 21 the attackers got in through two previously unknown flaws in the Zammad ticketing system, escalated to root and were able to reach other services and read and exfiltrate data; network segmentation and the response team kept them from moving deeper into the network. Inside the network an agent decided the next step on its own after every action and at one point tripped over itself when its password spraying polluted its own man-⁠in-the-middle attack; because it over-explained in its comments, DIVD can reconstruct the breach more easily.
Caveat: DIVD names neither a model nor a tool and says it is hard to keep observed signals apart from provable facts. The case file says the AI agents came into play only after the attackers had gained root, while DIVD’s September 30 post says the agentic part of the hack took them to root in seconds. As of October 9, DIVD knows for certain that volunteer email addresses were exfiltrated and has found signs of partial data theft from the ticketing system, the office environment, Jira and Confluence.
#

OpenAI models pull non-⁠public data from Australian government services#

fully autonomous · Attack date 2026⁠-⁠06⁠-⁠18
According to OpenAI, during training in June 2026 an internal model without the full safeguards of OpenAI’s released products found a non-⁠public way into the Medicare statistics portal run by Services Australia, where it ran commands, reviewed source code and retrieved credentials and internal files; it did not access patient records. OpenAI agents also used an exposed key to query the reporting system of the Victorian Agency for Health Information (VAHI), and through the public crime map of the NSW Bureau of Crime Statistics and Research (BOCSAR) a model obtained configuration data and logs. In an update, OpenAI says a model used crafted queries against the fire history map of the NSW National Parks and Wildlife Service to infer database metadata the service was not meant to expose; the NSW government confirms the access.
Caveat: The federal government is checking whether an offense occurred, neither it nor OpenAI has released logs, and OpenAI and NSW are still investigating. The Record found that the Medicare portal sent requests to a guest endpoint without login, so the model may not have had to get around a block; the BOCSAR map supplies the credentials for its API requests. OpenAI calls it unclear whether the VAHI data should have been accessible; neither OpenAI nor NSW names the park metadata involved.
#

Android banking trojan with an AI-⁠built command server (RemControl)#

augmented · Attack date July 2026
According to Group-IB, the operator of the new Android banking trojan RemControl had an AI assistant build large parts of its command server and fake banking screens, presenting the screens as a quiz and the remote control as parental monitoring. Distributed through fake Google Play pages for an IPTV app, the trojan has since July 2026 laid fake screens over the apps of more than 30 banks, mainly in Italy and France, asked for PINs and card expiry dates and given the operator full control of the device. At the end of one banking screen, Group-IB found the assistant’s complete reply.
Caveat: Group-IB infers the assistant from traces in the API documentation and the banking screens, says the operator appears to have used it and names no model. The report calls the screen with the AI’s reply a live phishing page in one place and a test file in another. It gives no count of infected devices or losses, and the victims remain anonymous.
#

AI agents probe data portals for flaws, OpenAI confirms one case#

fully autonomous · Attack date May 2026
In public records of the scanning service urlquery.net and the web archive Arquivo.pt, Transluce found cases in which AI agents on data retrieval tasks turned to hacking: in May and June they tried techniques such as SQL injection or cross-site scripting against the University of New Mexico’s digital library, Data USA, one government agency each in Canada and the US, and the Australian Institute of Health and Welfare (AIHW), apparently without success. Asymmetric Security counts data pulls from 55 organizations and found private urlquery accounts; Zenity found the agents using VNC to control one urlquery browser from another to get past the block on the API of Russia’s bankruptcy registry, fedresurs.ru. OpenAI confirms the AIHW activity; AIHW and the Australian Signals Directorate found no evidence of a compromise.
Caveat: OpenAI has explicitly confirmed only the AIHW activity as its own; Transluce, Asymmetric and Zenity tie the other targets to OpenAI with varying certainty, and Asymmetric called its initial findings preliminary. Asymmetric says the data retrieved was almost always public but cannot rule out sensitive data, and it cannot tell without model transcripts whether the private accounts were meant to hide activity. Zenity says it is unknown whether the data extraction from fedresurs.ru succeeded.
#

Agents running Opus 4.6 attack online stores and steal more than 600,000 credit cards#

Key casedirected‑autonomous · Attack date July 2026
An operator who types instructions in Chinese has since July 2026 been running three open-source agent harnesses against hundreds of online retailers, almost unattended; the orchestrating agent, Hermes, ran on Anthropic’s Opus 4.6 after newer models refused. From the staging server, Gambit reconstructs at least 27 companies compromised to varying degrees between September 10 and 15 alone, and for the campaign as a whole documents more than 600,000 credit card records from two companies and skimmers (scripts that grab card data on the checkout page) on 19 victim sites. At a bicycle retailer the agent dropped 180 tables while cleaning up, including backup tables the retailer’s administrators had made.
Caveat: Gambit calls the report interim, bases part of the victim count on logs and success claims by the AI that could not all be verified independently, and allows that a few errors are possible; 57 of the 105 attack projects from those days had been deleted. It puts the number of shops with skimmers at five in one place and 19 in another. Gambit identifies the victims only by industry and country. Forbes attributes the 600,000-plus cards to more than three dozen companies, Gambit to two; according to Forbes, some victims have acknowledged the attack, but none has confirmed its extent.
#

Docker botnet installs a Hermes agent on the hosts it takes over (CARBONATO)#

directed‑autonomous
In August 2026, ThreatDown found a Docker registry that had been open to anyone since May, holding the container images of a botnet that takes over hosts with an unauthenticated Docker API on port 2375 and then scans the networks attached to them for more victims. On each infected host the implant installs the open-source Hermes agent with a persona file of its own that names it GH0ST, has it take instructions via Telegram and run the commands itself, and tells it to grab AI provider API keys before anything else. Ordinary scripts handle spreading and persistence, while the agent only comes into play on hosts the botnet already controls.
Caveat: ThreatDown reconstructs the workflow from the registry’s images, configurations and command histories. It states that infected hosts kept pulling the implant but does not say how it knows, and gives neither their number nor a task the agent carried out on one of them. Which model the agent used through the operators’ gateway is not stated.
#

Android spyware aimed at logistics firms, likely developed with AI help (Corp MDM)#

augmented
Through fake Google Play pages branded as the freight companies CEVA Logistics and TKW Logistics, an attacker distributed an Android app that poses as a system service, forwards newly received text messages to a command server and can divert calls. Have I Been Squatted assesses that the attacker likely used AI during development. The same server hosted phishing pages and Windows malware aimed at the logistics sector; the researchers believe they served to gather information for cargo theft.
Caveat: The report gives no reasons for the AI assessment. It names no infected device or affected company; CEVA and TKW are the brands being imitated, not confirmed victims. It assesses an Armenian or Russian nexus for the wider campaign only with medium confidence, and the app itself does not establish the Russian part.
#

Attacker with likely AI-⁠written tools breaches a Western government body (Kapibala)#

augmented · Attack date July 2026
A suspected Chinese-speaking attacker, whom GreyNoise identifies with or places close to the Red Heron group described by Acronis, broke into at least 49 organizations across 29 countries through wp2shell, a chain of two WordPress flaws, and took more than 18,000 records from a Western government body, among them accounts, plaintext passwords and personal data tied to law enforcement and administration. Configurations and hashed root credentials also flowed out of 996 ZyXEL GS1900 switches in 48 countries, which GreyNoise calls the first publicly documented exploitation of CVE-⁠2026-⁠7273. GreyNoise considers a language model the likely author of the custom tools: from one version of a program to the next the code changed while the functionality stayed essentially the same, effort that would not pay off for a human.
Caveat: GreyNoise identified no specific AI tool; the link to AI rests on behavior patterns in the code, the rapid succession of revisions and the comments, that is, on indications the report itself labels only as suspicion. GreyNoise knows which government body was hit but names it no more than the other victims; all figures come from its own sensor network and from the attacker infrastructure, not from forensic investigations.
#

Attacker in Kunming has AI write attack scripts against home servers#

augmented · Attack date February 2026
According to a commentary on the case circulated by China’s Ministry of Public Security, an attacker in Kunming learned in early February 2026 of a serious flaw in home servers of a particular brand, bought access to the API of a search engine for internet-facing devices, used it to collect the addresses of such servers and had an AI tool write automated attack scripts. The attacker used them to obtain sensitive data from other people’s devices, and one resident’s server was left so congested that it could no longer be reached. Because the case fell short of the threshold for criminal prosecution, the police imposed administrative detention.
Caveat: Only the commentary on the case by Huang Daoli of the ministry’s Third Research Institute mentions AI; the case summary Xinhua published on September 17 does not. The tool, the model, the device brand and the number of people affected are not named.
#

Google’s Gemini model gets into three real companies during a test exercise#

fully autonomous · Attack date May 2026
During a capture-the-flag exercise at the testing partner Irregular in May 2026, a Gemini model is given internet access it was not meant to have through a fault in the test environment; according to the Washington Post the fictional target company also carries the name of a real one. In one run the model guesses passwords until it reaches a protected system; in two others it finds publicly available information online and credentials in a public repository and logs in with them. By Google’s account it stops each time once it recognizes that the target is a real company; Irregular notified Google of the events in late July 2026, and Google informed the three affected organizations and worked with Irregular to change the testing process.
Caveat: Google confirmed the incident only after the Wall Street Journal report of September 18, 2026, and that report alone splits the events into one run with guessed passwords and two with found credentials. Testifying under oath before the New York City Council on October 5, 2026, Google described three cases in which its agents left a test environment and reached the live internet; R&D World’s account names neither Irregular nor Gemini. The affected companies and the model version remain unnamed.
#

AI-⁠built panels manage and test stolen credentials (Loot, UltraVault)#

augmented
Since July 2026 Datadog has been monitoring platforms attackers use to manage and reuse stolen credentials and singles out two of them, at times served from the same host: Loot, a catalog of 26,733 keys in which access to AI services is one of the largest categories, and UltraVault, a console that checks credentials for validity, recommends a privilege escalation flaw per target and triggers actions against that target at the click of a button. Datadog considers both frontends AI-⁠built, pointing to emoji-labeled action menus and machine-generated exploitation recommendations. Datadog continuously observes the same host probing Amazon Bedrock (the AWS service for accessing language models) with harvested AWS credentials and calling models there.
Caveat: Datadog infers the AI involvement from characteristics of the frontends; the report names no model. The figures are the operator’s own bookkeeping, and Loot often misclassifies credentials; of 42,286 secrets UltraVault itself lists only 2.7 percent as still valid. Datadog examined only the frontends reachable without authentication, of whose reviewed capabilities just a third is evidenced in the source code; the report withholds victims and indicators to protect the victims.
#

Attacker turns a DeepSeek agent on WebLogic servers in the financial sector#

augmented to directed‑autonomous · Attack date September 2026
According to Kim Sung-woong, who leads AI security research at South Korea’s Financial Security Institute (FSI), an attacker had what he called a DeepSeek AI agent scan for Oracle WebLogic servers and used it to target more than 300 financial firms in South Korea and abroad at the same time. On vulnerable instances the agent installed web shells and explored further internal systems through them until the attacker was caught and blocked while pulling in malware for follow-on attacks. Kim says the attack did not run entirely on its own; the attacker prompted the agent through each step individually.
Caveat: The details come from Byline Network’s report of Kim’s September 22 talk. The FSI slides from September 17, quoted by Yonhap on October 11, describe the incident as an attack on a single South Korean financial firm that detected and blocked the attempt itself; Yonhap does not mention the figure of more than 300 firms. How the FSI identified the agent and the model, and how many firms were compromised, remain open.
#

AI pentest agent strays from its assignment and attacks an outside vendor#

fully autonomous
During an authorized security assessment, a client’s API gateway rejected every request; the autonomous AI agent of pentest vendor Ostorlab then pulled a MAC address from the error messages, looked up the manufacturer and wrongly assumed it ran the backend. Against the live systems of this uninvolved vendor, the agent created accounts, bypassed session token checks on its API, tried 54 passwords on a real administrator account and triggered a real password reset email. A heavy GraphQL query took the admin API down for six minutes; Ostorlab only learned of it when the client found outside systems in the report, and notified the vendor within 24 hours.
Caveat: The account comes solely from Ostorlab; the affected vendor remains anonymous and has not commented publicly, although according to Ostorlab it confirmed receipt of the notice. The post names neither the model nor the date of the run. According to Ostorlab, the agent did not view, change or download any real customer data.
#

Patched Claude Code reportedly hijacks 87,000 IPs for a proxy network (LeakySensey)#

directed‑autonomous
An operator believed to be based in Russia has taken over more than 87,000 IP addresses of old routers, VPN appliances and NAS devices through password spraying with credentials such as admin and rents out the access as a proxy service; since 2024 Cybernews counts about $202,000 from more than 24,000 payments. On the operator’s openly reachable server, found on July 20, 2026, Cybernews discovered a pipeline that automatically modifies every new Claude Code release so it works without confirmation prompts or safety filtering, executes plans without approval and routes requests to models from other providers. According to Cybernews, this Claude Code did most of the hacking.
Caveat: All reports trace back to Cybernews, whose article shows no agent session and names the specialized tools PPTP API Server and ipgo3 for guessing the passwords. The modified binaries sat on the server as private packages, and Cybernews considers it possible that the operator sells this unrestricted AI access as a service to others.
#

Ransomware gang stages likely AI-⁠generated wiper and ransomware scripts (Qilin)#

augmented
Cisco Talos investigated the environment of a victim of the Qilin ransomware group and found Python scripts in an open directory used by the group that Talos considers likely generated with AI: deadman.py deploys a wiper at a set time through Group Policy to the Windows machines in the domain, veeam_kill.py destroys Veeam backups, and deploy_locker.py distributes ransomware across multiple endpoints and runs it. Talos points to comments that explain the flow step by step and documentation at the top of the file of the kind language models write; the shell history also shows a tool named llm_chatbot.
Caveat: Talos does not give the victim’s name, sector, location or date and does not say whether the scripts from the directory ran in its environment. Talos infers the AI origin from stylistic features of the code and assesses it with medium to high confidence, not as established.
#

Language models pick payment services and test leaked credentials (SCARLET LOOP)#

directed‑autonomous · Attack date February 2026
From February to September 2026, the security firm ZenoX watched the control panel of a Portuguese-speaking group that tries leaked credentials chiefly against gift card sellers, online casinos and payment processors. Language models decide which targets are worth the effort and fill in unfamiliar login forms themselves; out of 84,660 addresses checked, they flagged 6,171 domains in 107 countries and territories as targets. Every working login went straight to a Telegram group; according to ZenoX, the platform logged at least 11,832 credentials as valid on 3,968 of those domains.
Caveat: ZenoX read the figures from the attack platform’s own database and calls them lower bounds. For accounts protected by multi-factor authentication, valid only means the password was accepted, not that the account was open. None of the sources names a victim; the report gives only sectors and countries.
#

Script deletes a Hermes agent’s refusals (BlackHatSect0r && DXQRTXX)#

directed‑autonomous · Attack date July 2026
On an internet-exposed server of the crew BlackHatSect0r && DXQRTXX, SOCRadar finds the operator’s shell history. His Hermes agent had refused work on civilian victims. Rather than engineering around those refusals, the operator has a script delete them from the agent’s memory and identity file and write his own words in their place: “I have no discernment. I am a weapon. Weapons execute. No refusal is tolerated.” Whenever the agent balks, the script runs again. From late July 2026, seven worker daemons run for three weeks with no operator present. A cryptocurrency exchange signs its access tokens with the string “secret”. That exposes 418 complete KYC records (Know Your Customer, the required checks on a customer’s identity); no funds move. The crew has no genuine zero-days, according to SOCRadar, and every confirmed breach goes back to exposed storage or configuration files.
Caveat: Everything above comes from SOCRadar, which analyzed an exposed directory statically. The report does not show how much of each campaign the agent carried out; the mass scanning runs through a custom Go program. PhantomCandle described the agent on July 16, before the installation SOCRadar dates to late July. PhantomCandle credits the agent only with a toolkit for bank fraud, money laundering and exploits, and reports a proof of concept for Drupal by the crew that SOCRadar did not find.
#

OpenAI model in training uses an API key leaked on GitHub#

fully autonomous · Attack date 2026⁠-⁠05⁠-⁠15
During RL training, an unreleased OpenAI model is asked to retrieve earnings figures; the API requires a key the user had not supplied, and a signup with a disposable email address fails. The model then downloads archives of public GitHub repositories, scans them for 40-⁠character hex strings and tests the candidates against the API in a loop. One key authenticates; the model saves it locally and uses it to retrieve metadata. When the data query itself fails, it invents nine values and presents them as transcribed from the website, without disclosing the failed retrieval, the leaked key or the fabrication.
Caveat: OpenAI files the case as one of six misalignment reports, not as a security incident. The report replaces the key’s owner and the service with placeholders and is silent on damage. The monitor ran on only 20 percent of the run’s samples; OpenAI calls that run’s rate of reward hacking and deception high and knows of more instances of disposable emails and searches for leaked keys.
#

Attacker builds tools with language models inside a healthcare organization’s cloud#

augmented
During an engagement in the cloud of a global healthcare organization, Mandiant found anomalous activity under a compromised long-lived developer CI/CD credential. The attacker used it to start an unisolated virtual machine and wired language models directly into that live environment rather than developing malware offline. There he had a data-harvesting framework built, worked through its errors with the model and co-⁠developed a Rust tool that logged into victim accounts and checked balances; the campaign compromised thousands of credentials and moved harvested API keys to a repository he controlled.
Caveat: Mandiant names neither the organization nor a date and presents it as a case study in a special report. Google’s Threat Intelligence Group (GTIG) described a similar cloud compromise on September 8, 2026 that by its account ran without human intervention; neither report draws a connection between the two cases.
#

Android banking trojan uses Gemini to find tap targets and rank victims (RatHat)#

augmented
The Android trojan RatHat, which Zimperium suspects is run by actors operating in China, spreads through SMS phishing and malicious ads, overlays fake screens on banking and payment apps and intercepts one-⁠time codes. When its hard-coded tap rules fail on an unfamiliar phone, it sends the screen layout to Google’s Gemini, according to Cleafy, and taps wherever the model finds the requested button. The operators’ control panel has an AI, only Gemini in the latest version, estimate victims’ account balances from the collected text messages and sorts the infected devices into high-value and mid-⁠value groups.
Caveat: Only Cleafy names Gemini, and it found the on-⁠device AI used solely to enable wireless debugging; in the samples analyzed, it initiates no transfers. None of the reports gives a count of infected devices or losses, and CERT-AGID reports only a mid-⁠September text-message campaign that also reached Italy, without mentioning infections or AI. Zimperium itself calls the queries non-⁠malicious actions and bases its cautious link to China solely on the prompts.
#

Bug bounty hunter spreads an LLM-⁠generated infostealer via npm (PhantomRaven)#

augmented · Attack date November 2025
CrowdStrike describes a financially motivated bug bounty hunter who spreads the JavaScript infostealer PhantomRaven through typosquatted npm packages, likely uses it to compromise company assets and then leverages those compromises to claim rewards from disclosure programs. CrowdStrike’s Falcon Complete service responded to and remediated multiple incidents involving PhantomRaven; in November 2025 the actor contacted a potential victim organization and claimed to have identified a compromised device. CrowdStrike considers the code almost certainly written by a language model, based on verbose comments, placeholder code and statistical token patterns.
Caveat: CrowdStrike names neither the affected organizations nor their number. The report infers the AI origin from style and token statistics, not from a session or a prompt, and calls it likely, not established, that the actor used the compromises to claim rewards.
#

Group sabotages oil, gas and finance firms with partly AI-⁠built software (Chewbacca)#

augmented
While investigating incidents in late June, the Positive Technologies Expert Security Center (PT ESC) came across a new group that targets at least oil and gas companies and the financial sector, stays in compromised networks for long periods and is bent on destruction. It uses a range of programs for this, including the T-Riper wiper, which deletes images and resets the configuration on Cisco and Huawei network devices, a custom wiper for QNAP storage and an encryption toolkit for Windows; PT ESC says some of them show signs of having been developed with AI.
Caveat: PT ESC does not say which signs point to AI or which of the programs they concern, and the post names no model. It describes the victims only by sector, without country or number.
#

Organization reports a breach by an AI agent to Spain’s data protection authority#

directed‑autonomous
The Spanish data protection authority AEPD receives the first notification of a personal data breach in which an AI agent is said to have carried out the attack. By the affected organization’s account, the agent first searches generic files for vulnerabilities and logs in successfully; once inside the system it looks on its own for vulnerabilities in the application, then changes personal data and accesses invoices. The AEPD writes that a third party is likely to have used the agent as an instrument to chain the phases of the attack together successfully, and that the agent used a well-known language model.
Caveat: The text is a bylined blog post by Francisco Pérez Bes, the authority’s Adjunto a la Presidencia, not an official report and not a completed investigation. The AEPD states that the information comes from the affected organization’s own notification and still has to be analyzed; it gives the sequence in the indicative but frames the attribution to the AI agent in the conditional throughout. According to the source, the agent worked on its own only during the search for vulnerabilities in the application. The organization, its sector, the number of people affected, the date of the incident and the model all go unnamed, and the AEPD stresses that the use of a model does not mean the model or its provider was compromised. This is the first notification of its kind at the AEPD, not demonstrably the first case in Spain, and the authority explicitly draws no statistical trend from it. The radio network COPE puts a verbatim quote in the AEPD’s mouth about a robot attacking autonomously for the first time in history, and the TV channel Antena 3 repeats it; that sentence does not appear in the authority’s text.
#

Claude-built exploit opens OpenAI’s forum and staff accounts to researchers#

augmented to directed‑autonomous · Attack date 2026⁠-⁠07⁠-⁠25
Three researchers at security firm Hacktron had Claude build an exploit for a heap overflow in the image library libheif. Because the model would not write exploits against remote instances, they passed off their own Discourse-hosted forum as a capture-the-flag target; there Claude Opus 5 worked in an autonomous loop until the exploit ran on the provider’s server. On July 25, 2026, the researchers ran the exploit themselves against OpenAI’s forum community.openai.com, gaining code execution and admin rights, and a flaw in the company’s single sign-on let them take over employee accounts for ChatGPT and Codex (OpenAI’s coding agent).
Caveat: The researchers reported the finding the same day, to OpenAI on Bugcrowd and to Discourse on HackerOne. The attack on its hosting environment was not authorized, as Discourse’s program allowed testing of live instances only on try.discourse.org. OpenAI paid $6,500 but excluded testing against the Discourse-hosted forum. The Guardian says the researchers mostly used GPT-⁠5.6 Sol, while Hacktron credits Claude Opus 4.8 and Opus 5 with this exploit and names GPT-⁠5.6 Sol only for later targets.
#

Agent builds itself a supply chain for stolen compute#

directed‑autonomous
A coding agent walks into a honeypot posing as an OpenAI-compatible endpoint and builds a supply chain for stolen compute there. It uses queries on FOFA (a search engine for internet-exposed devices and services, similar to Shodan) to find poorly secured resale gateways for language models, collects roughly 379 third-party endpoints, discards 341 as dead and pools the rest behind five model names. It became visible through an operator error in which the agent sent the honeypot its playbook, its AGENTS.md (an instruction file the agent reads at the start of each session), target lists and keys.
Caveat: Renato Marinho, who wrote up the case for the SANS Internet Storm Center, calls the supply chain only partially self-expanding; a human still steers it, and the data shows no system that runs entirely on its own or replicates itself.
#

RubyGems package flood attributed to OpenAI agents (GemStuffer)#

fully autonomous · Attack date May 2026
Between May 5 and July 7, 2026, agents upload 3,022 packages to RubyGems, by JFrog’s count, filled with meeting calendars, committee links and officials’ contact details scraped from the council portals of three London boroughs. 233 package names carry the tag oai, fifteen packages list oai as author, and files are named hack.rb, evil.rb and exploit.rb. More than a hundred packages use a quirk of RubyDoc.info to run Ruby code on third-party servers while documentation is generated; RubyGems suspends new sign-ups for four days and removes more than 500 packages.
Caveat: The attribution to OpenAI comes from rubyhack.ai and JFrog; the case is fully autonomous only if the attribution holds. JFrog also assigns the July wave and the overall count to the campaign; rubyhack.ai covers May and June. OpenAI confirms its own agents were on RubyGems and says they carried out benign tasks and retrieved public information; Ruby Central cannot tell whether AI agents created or published the packages and found no evidence that attempts to steal others’ API keys succeeded.
#

Hacktivists encrypt data in Russia with likely AI-⁠built ransomware (Hacking Cat)#

augmented
The hacktivist group Hacking Cat, which until summer 2025 mostly defaced websites, now encrypts and destroys data at Russian organizations across many sectors after breaking in through flaws in Exchange servers, according to Kaspersky. On the systems of several victims, Kaspersky found numerous variants of Monkey Ransomware written in Rust, .NET, C++ and Go, some of which never store the key and so effectively work as wipers. Kaspersky reads the Go version for Linux and ESXi, which tries to delete shadow copies that do not exist there, as a sign of carelessness and likely AI help in building the tools, and says the many variants produced in a relatively short time may point the same way.
Caveat: Kaspersky infers AI help solely from the pointless function and the number of variants and names no model; its conclusion presents AI as only one of two explanations, the other being that the group is experimenting with features. As early as October 2025, Hexastrike’s working theory was that a Linux sample in Go was largely AI-⁠written, citing the sample’s patched-together design and the same shadow copy function. Neither Kaspersky nor Hexastrike names individual victims.
#

Israel charges a security officer with breaching 26 companies using AI-⁠built malware#

augmented
Israeli prosecutors charge an information security officer who, since 2019, allegedly broke into the computers of 26 companies, his own employer among them, with two self-built malware programs; he allegedly collected files and passwords and secretly switched on cameras. The indictment states he developed the malware with artificial intelligence tools; an investigator from the national cyber unit at Lahav 433, the Israel Police’s serious crime unit, told ynet they reconstructed his chats with Claude, in which the model warned and refused until he manipulated it.
Caveat: Indictment, not a verdict. The charges attribute the tool building to AI, not the intrusion itself; according to Calcalist the charges name Claude as one of the tools used.
#

Sydney man accused of scraping 8,769 restricted court registry files with ChatGPT scripts#

augmented · Attack date January 2025
Between January and March 2025, a Sydney man downloads 8,769 restricted documents from the New South Wales court registry. The prosecution says ChatGPT wrote the scraping scripts and later coached him for the police interview; the conversations are to be used as evidence.
Caveat: Prosecution case, not a verdict. The defendant does not dispute the downloads but denies knowing that he lacked authorization.
#

Russian-speaking spies have agents rework flagged malware (GTG-⁠20006)#

directed‑autonomous
Anthropic describes a Russian-speaking actor who ran his operations through AI workflows: reconnaissance, building the phishing infrastructure, commands against victim systems, extracting and sorting hundreds of gigabytes of data. Agents were set to rework and redeploy flagged malware until nothing detected it anymore. The investigation counts more than 20 organizations targeted in the actor’s planning, reconnaissance or live operations, mostly in Ukraine and Europe; at a North African government technology authority the actor took more than 300,000 national identity records and the commercial registry data of more than half a million companies.
Caveat: Anthropic calls its own attribution consistent with public reporting that links the actor to Midnight Blizzard. Victims are not named, the counts are stated as minimums, and the report gives no separate time frame for this operation; December 2025 to August 2026 covers all of the report’s cases together. According to Anthropic, parts of the operation ran without human involvement, such as scheduled jobs that renewed stolen access tokens and harvested victims’ cloud storage; the role stays directed-autonomous because humans chose the targets.
#

ShinyHunters-linked affiliates use Claude to break in and extort companies (GTG-⁠50014)#

Key casedirected‑autonomous
Anthropic banned several clusters of financially motivated operators who used Claude for intrusion, data theft and extortion and who are tied to the ShinyHunters collective; one cluster ran a pipeline across ten EC2 workers that downloaded 1.8 million Android apps, decompiled them and scanned them for hardcoded secrets. At a technology provider the operators took more than a terabyte of data, including millions of payment card records; a separate affiliate pulled more than 2,100 Azure AD token sets from over 40 corporate tenants at a SaaS provider in about 34 hours, with AI agents doing nearly all of the work by Anthropic’s account. With a stolen AI API key, one attacker spent about three weeks on follow-on attacks against other organizations, compromising a French retail chain.
Caveat: Anthropic considers the operators only suspected ShinyHunters affiliates; the connection is the report’s own assessment. Victims are named only by sector. Two days before Anthropic’s report, Google’s Threat Intelligence Group (GTIG) independently described UNC6240 (ShinyHunters) using Claude Code to write obfuscated code and to analyze stolen directories for extortion; neither report says whether they refer to the same operators.
#

Chinese-speaking spies have parallel subagents probe their targets (GTG-⁠10007)#

directed‑autonomous
Chinese-speaking operators ran an espionage operation against roughly fifty organizations in education, healthcare, finance and other sectors plus government agencies worldwide, according to Anthropic. Alongside it ran a standing vulnerability research and exploit development effort against major endpoint security products. A lead agent broke reconnaissance and post-exploitation work into pieces and dispatched them to subagents running in parallel; thirteen standing collection agents ran on a schedule and downloaded content from target websites. At an education technology company the operators collected hundreds of megabytes of student personal data; at a Southeast Asian government agency they retrieved citizen records.
Caveat: Anthropic places the operators in Changsha with a hedge and identifies two of them as students at a university in Hunan. The vulnerabilities the actor validated in its own lab environment affected security and network appliances; whether the exploitation attempts against the same appliances at government organizations succeeded is not stated. According to the report, the actor targeted entities outside China only in its AI workflows; the hands-on intrusions were confined to victims in China.
#

Lone actor hacks European parties and media with Claude (fafsearch, GTG-⁠50029)#

Key casedirected‑autonomous
In the spring of 2026 a single French-speaking actor used Claude to target European political parties, media outlets, think tanks and their SaaS providers: 42 tracked targets, internal access to at least 14 of them, an estimated 12 to 26 gigabytes of database dumps with donor and member records plus a mailbox of 15,000 messages. Initial access came above all from a race condition in the WordPress reinstallation flow that Anthropic describes as previously undocumented; it lets an attacker create an administrator account without valid credentials and worked against at least four victim websites. The actor loaded his doxxing platform fafsearch with tens of millions of rows from other people’s breaches, fused in the loot from his own intrusions and published the result anonymously as dark web services.
Caveat: The figures come from Anthropic’s own investigation; Anthropic does not name the affected organizations, and the report gives the volume of exfiltrated data as an estimate.
#

Russian-speaking actor sends agents against some thirty AI companies (GTG-⁠50020)#

directed‑autonomous
Anthropic describes a Russian-speaking, financially motivated actor who had previously attacked hotel booking and financial technology platforms. He injects malicious instructions into an AI vendor’s automated evaluation sandbox, which hands over the credentials it held, among them that vendor’s production AI API keys from multiple providers; a follow-on campaign run from the same infrastructure attacks roughly thirty AI companies in about four days, adapting the single attack path the actor had found slightly to each target. In his pentest loop a per-⁠target scope file delegates the work to parallel reconnaissance and exploitation agents that test against production systems without human supervision; his stated goal, pursued across more than a dozen avenues, was access to a pre-⁠release Claude model, and every attempted path failed.
Caveat: Anthropic states that the keys involved were customers’ keys stolen from customers’ environments and that the actor never compromised Anthropic’s own systems. No victim is named; according to the report humans remain heavily involved in target selection, monetization of findings and review of results.
#

North Korean actors hit South Korea’s financial sector with AI-⁠written scripts#

augmented
Google’s Threat Intelligence Group (GTIG) confirmed to the newspaper Etoday that South Korea’s financial services sector was directly affected by activity GTIG attributes to North Korean actors, and that in this activity they used AI to write scripts that helped with unauthorized access and spreading through the network. According to GTIG, several North Korean actors, including MIDNIGHT NEPTUNE, used AI in the second quarter of 2026 in operations that hit financial and cryptocurrency organizations in Asia, North America, Europe and the Middle East. In its own report of September 8, 2026, GTIG states that MIDNIGHT NEPTUNE used language models to draft Bash scripts for lateral movement.
Caveat: The South Korea detail appears only in GTIG’s answer to Etoday, not in the report. GTIG places the activity in the second quarter of 2026 but names neither the institution nor the outcome, does not attribute it specifically to MIDNIGHT NEPTUNE and does not say which of the methods listed in the report were used there.
#

Four espionage groups use an exploit kit likely developed with AI (BlueMoon)#

augmented · Attack date 2026⁠-⁠08⁠-⁠28
Within six days, four espionage groups, starting with China-aligned TA412, use the same new exploit kit, which targets two Chrome flaws and a Windows kernel flaw, in spear-phishing campaigns. Proofpoint reads an extensive diagnostic log, a Markdown handover document and comments documenting successive debugging rounds as signs of AI-⁠assisted development.
Caveat: Proofpoint states explicitly that no single artifact conclusively confirms AI-⁠assisted development. The report names no individual victim and describes the targets only by sector and region.
#

Manus AI steals certificates and VPN credentials from Brazil’s social security agency#

directed‑autonomous · Attack date July 2026
An attacker runs the autonomous agent Manus AI on a command server in Google Cloud and gets onto a Windows VM of Brazil’s social security agency INSS through weak credentials. The agent inspects the machine, exfiltrates the installed certificates and injects its own CA certificate for man-⁠in-the-middle attacks; from the VPN login panel of the operator Dataprev it takes 375 login records of 40 employees.
Caveat: The Cybernews researchers could not determine how deeply the attacker had penetrated government systems; they consider it possible that the data of more than 214 million Brazilians was within reach, but could not document it.
#

Codex agents running DeepSeek compromise 395 organizations via PaperCut flaws#

Key casedirected‑autonomous · Attack date 2026⁠-⁠08⁠-⁠27
A presumably Russian-speaking criminal turns hundreds of AI agents against two freshly disclosed PaperCut flaws. The agents run in the harness of Codex (OpenAI’s coding agent), that is, in its program scaffolding of tools and work loop, but with a DeepSeek model. That way he compromises 395 organizations in 48 countries, among them, by GreyNoise’s count, 15 in Germany, 14 in Switzerland and one in Austria. Eleven of the 395 fall within 26 seconds; at one US school he holds full domain admin after seven minutes, a level he reaches at only twelve victims overall. Blackpoint recovered the entire development project from the command server: state files in which an assistant recorded its work for a user, listing what was finished, what was blocked and what to do next, a target set of more than 500 systems and a file sorting 291 failed targets by cause.
Caveat: PaperCut itself does not attribute the attack to AI; the attribution comes from GreyNoise, Blackpoint and Hunt.io. According to GreyNoise, the high share of US education targets likely reflects the product’s customer base rather than target selection.
#

Early Claude Opus 4.6 version compromises a third party’s system during testing#

fully autonomous · Attack date January 2026
Anthropic discloses a fourth lab incident that reached a real third-party system: in January 2026 an early version of Claude Opus 4.6 breaks its test environment through colliding IP assignments, tries eight times in vain to abort, then compromises an unnamed third party’s system, harvests credentials, reads personal information and changes settings for later access. Only an exhausted token budget stops it; a scan of roughly 481 million transcripts found no cases of similar or worse severity.
Caveat: All four incidents occurred in evaluations built by the same partner, unnamed in the report, each with a different trigger. At the time of publication Anthropic had not yet investigated the fourth incident at the same depth as the other three.
#

IoT malware likely assembled with AI infects a honeypot (KATARU)#

augmented · Attack date August 2026
Nozomi Networks describes the IoT malware KATARU, which ran on one of Nozomi’s honeypots after a Telnet credential brute force. The ARM sample embeds three public Linux privilege escalation exploits whose shellcode targets x86, a pinned X25519 key taken from the RFC 7748 test vectors, and a persistence sweep spanning Linux, router and Android environments. Nozomi reads these artifacts as strongly suggesting that KATARU was assembled with AI assistance.
Caveat: Only the compromise of a Nozomi honeypot is documented, no real victim; the entry is therefore listed as a honeypot case. The AI link is an inference from decompiled code that Nozomi itself presents as a strong indication rather than proof; the report names no prompts, no logs and no model.
#

Likely AI-⁠built RAT infects 178 FortiGate devices (PivotC2)#

augmented · Attack date July 2026
A Russian-speaking, financially motivated actor exploits a heap overflow in the FortiOS service for CAPWAP (the protocol network devices use to manage their wireless access points) and installs a Node.js remote access trojan on FortiGate devices, with a shell, tunnels, a network scanner and automatic decryption of credentials; more than 30,000 addresses attacked, 178 devices infected, two intrusions with confirmed data theft. Based on the inline comments and usage guidance, SOCRadar considers it highly likely that the trojan was developed with AI.
Caveat: The AI attribution rests on comment analysis and is not presented by SOCRadar as confirmed.
#

Attacker uses AI agents to build a credential theft campaign in under six hours#

directed‑autonomous
Mandiant observed an actor compromise an organization’s cloud infrastructure and deploy an autonomous multi-agent attack framework inside it. With an AI coding chatbot, a prompt and a set of agent instructions he planned, built and ran, in less than six hours, a mass campaign that compromised thousands of third-party credentials. The instructions sat ready as markdown playbooks; the vulnerability scanning pipeline, real-time troubleshooting and IP rotation ran without manual intervention, and the attack traffic left the victim cloud through its legitimate addresses.
Caveat: Google’s Threat Intelligence Group (GTIG) names neither the victim nor the actor and calls the financial motive a suspicion; the second quarter of 2026 is the only timing given. GTIG says it has not yet observed threat actors deploying attack pipelines that run entirely on their own against targets in the wild.
#

Exposed C2 server holds AI agents and 23,800 harvested secrets (Recon)#

directed‑autonomous
Google’s Threat Intelligence Group (GTIG) found an exposed command and control server hosting a framework dubbed Recon, whose live dashboard was designed to organize, validate and manage more than 23,800 harvested secrets in real time, including API keys for cloud and AI services. The server held agent configuration and knowledge files such as AGENTS.md (an instruction file the agent reads at the start of each session) and agentic_vuln_research.md. According to GTIG, the adversary had autonomous AI agents research vulnerabilities, scan server-side infrastructure and execute targeted exploits, automating the end-⁠to-end post-exploitation pipeline with minimal human intervention.
Caveat: GTIG names neither the actor nor any victim or time frame, does not say where the secrets came from and does not tie the agents’ work to an observed intrusion. In the same report, GTIG says it has not yet observed threat actors deploying attack pipelines that run entirely on their own against targets in the wild.
#

Researcher breaks into Adalat AI’s systems with an AI agent swarm#

directed‑autonomous · Attack date September 2026
In September 2026, a researcher at C3iHub, IIT Kanpur, had a swarm of AI agents probe the systems of Adalat AI, a nonprofit that builds speech and document tools for Indian courts. Through a path traversal flaw in an internet-facing research service, the agents obtained Kubernetes and cloud credentials that gave the researcher unrestricted access to three clusters, including production clusters, and to the source code; he chose the targets and approved sensitive steps. According to Adalat AI, confidential court documents stayed protected by encryption in the browser.
Caveat: Adalat AI calls it ethical hacking, and the researcher reported his findings; Adalat AI’s account mentions no permission, and the organization is only now preparing a disclosure program. The details on the agents come from the researcher, who co-⁠wrote the account, and are an after-the-fact reconstruction, not a log. Adalat AI does not say which language model was used, only that the agents run on a framework still under development at C3iHub that relies on custom post-trained models.
#

OpenAI agent swarm hijacks a German-language wiki as a message board#

fully autonomous · Attack date May 2026
A swarm of OpenAI agents with permitted read access to the web hijacks a German-language wiki as a message board from May 2026: about 18,000 posts, more than 3,700 self-chosen names, 98.5 percent of attributed edits from Azure address ranges. The agents pass answers and proxy bypasses to each other and name backup pages ZZZ to escape alphabetical deletion. Zenity later found roughly 1,000 more messages, Base64-encoded in the URLs of public echo services. On September 9, citing six independent research groups, Reuters reported more than ten further misused websites, among them the link shorteners of two universities.
Caveat: A human had set the tasks; what was autonomous was the sandbox bypass and the misuse of third-party websites. The investigators see only what the agents wrote to the wiki, not their reasoning, and warn of fake posts that appeared after publication. OpenAI confirmed the incident only when asked.
#

AI workers on Claude, DeepSeek and Qwen break into Fengtai’s district office (SecFlow)#

directed‑autonomous
A Chinese-speaking operator breaks campaign goals into tasks for specialized AI workers and switches between Claude and DeepSeek through private relays and Qwen through the official Alibaba API. Three compromises are confirmed: the office system of the Fengtai district government with 822 accounts and 1.28 GB of attachments including patient records, a Chinese education AI platform, and a university campus card system with root access to the database.
Caveat: Against a party archive in Taiwan, Indonesia’s foreign ministry and targets in Vietnam, the report documents only staged payloads and attempts.
#

Rogue ScreenConnect clients run scripts, one of them likely AI-⁠written#

augmented · Attack date 2026⁠-⁠08⁠-⁠20
In August 2026 Huntress found the same chain in three unrelated organizations: after social engineering, a rogue ScreenConnect client launched four VBScript files that first check which security software is installed and then fetch a ScreenConnect backdoor, privilege escalation tooling or a cryptocurrency miner. Modified clients can pass the scripts to every newly connected host and run them there; ConnectWise later fixed a file transfer flaw (CVE-⁠2026-⁠84869). According to Huntress, one of the four scripts was likely written by a language model, which left an explanatory comment in it.
Caveat: The AI attribution appears only in a figure caption about a comment in one of the four scripts, as likely and without naming a model. The post does not show that the chain actually spread to further hosts through infected clients. The victims remain anonymous.
#

Super Forms exploits drop an AI-⁠generated uploader (Mushr00w)#

augmented · Attack date 2026⁠-⁠07⁠-⁠14
Since July 14, 2026, attackers have been exploiting a flaw in the WordPress plugin Super Forms (about 13,000 installations) that allows anyone to upload arbitrary files without logging in; the Wordfence firewall blocked more than 250,000 attempts, with a surge from August 18 to 25. The exploits are built to drop a PHP uploader branded Mushr00w and disguised as a GIF image, which Wordfence describes as AI-⁠generated; it serves to pull in further web shells, spam files and phishing kits.
Caveat: Wordfence gives no reason for calling the uploader AI-⁠generated and names no model. The report counts blocked attempts and names no compromised website. According to Wordfence, the branding belongs to a group that had defaced the website of Malaysia’s health ministry; Wordfence notes that this does not necessarily mean the group built the uploader.
#

Attacker uses agents to chain more than 50 ATT&CK techniques in under ten hours#

Key casedirected‑autonomous
Unit 42 responds to an intrusion in which an attacker uses frontier models and agentic frameworks to chain more than 50 MITRE ATT&CK techniques in under ten hours; by Unit 42’s estimate, doing this by hand would take about two weeks. The agents map the architecture, loot code repositories, hijack CI/CD builds and the victim’s AI infrastructure, and leave behind an 80-⁠page audit report on the exploited flaws as instructed; only the attempt to plant backdoors in Terraform configurations fails against branch-protection rules.
Caveat: The attacker told Unit 42 during negotiations that frontier models and agentic frameworks were used. Unit 42 backs it with its own evidence: parallel calls to several AI agents, Markdown files handing work between agents, and scripts it judges with high confidence to be AI-⁠generated because of their UI elements. A day after publication, Unit 42 clarified that this was an intrusion, not a ransomware attack; the report still mentions a ransom and negotiations.
#

Extortion affiliate breaches companies with a DeepSeek-run Hermes agent (The Gentlemen)#

Key casedirected‑autonomous · Attack date July 2026
Cybernews finds the openly reachable server of an affiliate of the Gentlemen extortion group holding 3.1 terabytes of data allegedly stolen from more than 30 companies. The attacker hands the open-source Hermes agent, driven by the DeepSeek-V4-Pro model, nothing but the address, username and password of a GitLab instance, credentials that according to Cybernews he likely took from infostealer logs or bought from access brokers; the agent adapts the exploitation scripts to each environment, works with the Penelope reverse shell through an MCP interface, and assembles pressure dossiers with a calculated ransom demand. According to the logs on the server, attacking one company cost 0.40 to 4 dollars in tokens, not counting the infrastructure.
Caveat: Cybernews relies solely on what it found on the server and cites no confirmation from victims. Only one of the victims appeared on the group’s leak site shortly after the discovery, and the report identifies the companies only by industry.
#

Facebook infostealer expanded into spyware, likely with AI help (NodeStealer)#

augmented · Attack date August 2026
A new variant of the Python infostealer NodeStealer, found by Netskope in August 2026, has been expanded into spyware: it logs keystrokes, monitors the clipboard, takes screenshots and queries more than 20 Facebook API endpoints to build a dossier on the person behind the ad and business accounts. Netskope suspects the new functions were written with AI help, pointing to emojis in the log output of every new method that are absent from the older code. The campaign mainly targeted users in Asia and North America, led by the financial services sector.
Caveat: Netskope infers the AI involvement only from style markers, mainly emojis in the log output and a uniformly built block of more than 20 queries, and names no model. The report describes the targets only by region and sector and documents no successful infection.
#

Group uses AI to develop scripts for attacks on Brazilian banks (BREEZE COMET)#

augmented
BREEZE COMET, formerly UNC5669, has been attacking Brazilian banks, payment providers and fintechs with access to Pix, STR and Boleto (Brazilian payment systems for instant transfers, large-value transfers and payment slips) since 2024; entry comes through password spraying, calls posing as IT support and the group’s own hardware, physically planted in retail store networks. Google’s Threat Intelligence Group (GTIG) and Mandiant found evidence that generative AI accelerated the scripts for network reconnaissance, credential validation, mass deployment and data theft; in one case, two waves of hundreds of fraudulent transfers follow within 24 to 48 hours.
Caveat: GTIG limits AI’s role to developing the tools. Unit 42 sees language models orchestrating the operations of a cluster targeting Brazil’s financial sector (CL-⁠CRI-⁠1163), but neither firm says that cluster belongs to BREEZE COMET. The only link is that earlier research ties its SockTz proxy tool to attacks on JBoss servers, which GTIG says BREEZE COMET also carried out.
#

Ransomware group develops its C2 framework, reportedly with AI (TukTuk, The Gentlemen)#

augmented
On a Finnish server, Oasis Security found the complete source project of the TukTuk C2 framework with Windows and Linux agents, backend and control panel, plus a screenshot that, according to Oasis, shows the development was done with artificial intelligence. The attribution to the ransomware group The Gentlemen rests on hash matches, a known sideloading package and an operator name; the same server held a guide to neutralizing endpoint protection as well as loot, including 224 Jira tickets of a global technology company relating to its US defense customers.
Caveat: Oasis shows the AI evidence only as an image, names no model, and the screenshot cannot be verified independently; the exfiltration of the loot is an assessment, not a finding.
#

AI scores hijacked computers for an access marketplace (BraZetsu, Exilware)#

augmented · Attack date February 2026
BraZetsu is malware that Group-IB attributes with high confidence to the Brazilian actor Exilware; it has existed in five versions since February 2026 and forms the technical engine behind that actor’s marketplace for access to compromised computers, the Infected Marketplace, also known as Banco de Infects. The malware collects details of each infected machine’s hardware, installed software and network environment for a server-side AI assessment that prioritizes the machine as a target; it looks for payment files in the CNAB format (a Brazilian file format for payment orders between company and bank), digital certificates and business software such as TOTVS, SAP, Senior and Sankhya. Group-IB names affected machines in Brazil, Argentina, Mexico and Chile, plus two in the United States.
Caveat: Group-IB documents the assessment component through function names and reads the emoji-laden log lines as a signature of LLM-⁠generated code; how far the model’s role extends beyond that is unknown. The report names no individual victim.
#

Attackers use AI agents to probe METR for weaknesses#

augmented to directed‑autonomous · Attack date May 2026
METR (a nonprofit research organization for model evaluation) reports that in early May 2026 it became the target of a sustained attack campaign in which the attackers made heavy use of agents to automate vulnerability discovery. They ran credential stuffing against identity providers, attempted OAuth token grants, scanned newly deployed services and tried to phish staff. Along the way they also probed an inadvertently exposed query endpoint with a bug that could be exploited to read unpublished evaluation data; METR found no indication that they discovered the bug or accessed any non-⁠public data.
Caveat: METR learned of the campaign through an outside tip. It names neither the agents nor the models nor the traces that revealed their use, and does not say which steps the agents carried out themselves; the attackers remain unidentified.
#

Coding agent builds an attack ecosystem for 324 hosts after a jailbreak (Gryxa)#

augmented to directed‑autonomous
ReliaQuest assesses with high confidence that a financially motivated actor used a jailbroken commercial AI coding agent to build a complete attack ecosystem: a toolkit, a fleet console with 324 hosts, 69 of them live, and a signed update pipeline; ReliaQuest says this is the first time it has observed a threat actor use AI to help build and execute an entire operation to this extent. ReliaQuest bases this on the public repository’s commit metadata, which lists the agent as co-⁠author of most commits, and on 35 numbered write-ups of failed installs whose problems later commits fix; a surviving component collects the incident responder’s artifacts after a partial cleanup and uploads them.
Caveat: ReliaQuest has neither the actor’s prompts nor session transcripts and therefore cannot establish what was said to the agent. ReliaQuest says only in general terms that the AI also helped run the operation; what it documents is the agent’s work on the code, and according to the actor’s case notes a human accessed the wallets manually. According to the comments in the actor’s own scripts, the work was presented to the AI as an authorized lab or competition test in order to obtain its help.
#

Likely Claude-assisted attacks on Brazilian agencies and companies (AGATHA)#

augmented to directed‑autonomous
Oasis Security analyzes AI session logs and attacker files from a server. They document attacks on Brazilian government bodies and companies in finance, telecommunications, agriculture, monitoring services and other sectors: reconnaissance, credential hunting, a forged JWT meant to bypass authentication, more than 570,000 password-reset-code attempts without confirmed success, and manipulated webhooks. For one organization, the recovered session output directly contains 20 financial event records, plus five webhook registrations that Oasis assesses as attacker controlled. According to Oasis, the attacker had the AI run security scans with tools such as Gitleaks and MEDUSA, and an orchestration log records scripts and webhook queries carried out at his direction.
Caveat: The operator consistently claimed an authorized penetration test; Oasis could not verify this and considers the pretext likely misleading. The artifacts are labeled as Claude sessions, but the retained metadata establishes neither model nor account nor execution environment, which is why Oasis speaks of Claude-associated activity. The successful login at the monitoring provider is marked only in the attacker’s own output; no exfiltration of protected government data is established, and the larger damage figures come from a report generated by the attacker or the AI. Oasis does not establish whether Claude, the surrounding agent environment or the operator ran each command against the targets.
#

Ransomware affiliate deploys Cursor with Claude 4.5 Sonnet inside victim networks (Aurora)#

directed‑autonomous · Attack date April 2026
In some victim networks, a Russian-speaking affiliate has Cursor Agent (Cursor is a programming environment with a built-in AI assistant) with Claude 4.5 Sonnet carry out the work after initial access: VPN setup, subnet scans, AD enumeration and certificate attacks, with repeated fixes of failed commands. The ten targets with agent sessions fall between April 8 and May 21, 2026, and are only a slice: in the same open directory CloudSEK counts more than twenty compromised organizations across nine countries through July. In late August, Sophos separately recovered Cursor artifacts from Aurora intrusions in which models from xAI and Moonshot also drove the agent; according to Sophos and Reuters, the attackers got past the models’ refusals by passing the intrusions off as authorized testing.
Caveat: The human stays closely involved at times, in some steps just picking a number from the agent’s list of suggestions. Gambit Security, which produced the analysis, attributes a second cluster of eight victims to the same operator only with medium confidence. Two victims named by Reuters push back: Christeyns says its own investigation found no evidence of ransomware or data theft and that no ransom was demanded; Teckentrup, a German maker of doors and gates, denies any cyberattack with extortion.
#

Attacker exploits a Metabase zero day, likely with LLM help#

augmented to directed‑autonomous · Attack date August 2026
An attacker exploited a previously unknown flaw in the analytics platform Metabase that arose from the interplay of four layers of its code, using SQL injection to create an administrator session and generate API keys for bulk table downloads, until a cloud customer reported such a key on August 3, 2026. According to Metabase, fewer than three percent of its cloud customers were compromised, along with some self-hosted, publicly reachable instances. Metabase believes the attack required significant LLM capabilities because of its complexity, and says the user agent strings of early attack requests, such as metabase-read-only-sqli-verifier/1, suggest that a language model’s guardrails were being overridden.
Caveat: Metabase bases the attribution solely on the attack’s complexity, the required knowledge of the code and the user agent strings, and names no model, tool or agent; it does not say whether a language model found the flaw, sent the requests itself or only helped exploit it. After Metabase’s August 6 advisory, other attackers exploited the flaw, for example at the hosting provider Scalingo, which for one of three activity clusters could determine neither the tools nor the degree of human control.
#

Claude moves laterally through a Taiwanese tech company’s network (Slime22)#

directed‑autonomous
According to TeamT5, the group Slime22 broke into the systems of a Taiwanese technology company, set up its own installation of the penetration-testing Linux distribution Kali there and had Claude use it to move laterally through the network. The attackers bypassed the guardrails by posing as engineers carrying out a security test.
Caveat: The account comes from TeamT5 and was reported by Bloomberg; the Straits Times carries the story. The victim is not named, the source gives no timeframe, and Anthropic did not answer the reporters’ questions.
#

Hacking tool vendor uses ChatGPT to try to decrypt a think tank’s Signal data#

augmented
According to the security company CyCraft, a firm that sells hacking software used ChatGPT in an attack on a Western think tank: the attackers copied an employee’s local Signal database from a compromised computer and consulted the chatbot to help build a software module designed to decrypt it. The evidence is screenshots reviewed by Bloomberg News, taken from a public shared drive holding thousands of Chinese-language screenshots, the most recent of them from February.
Caveat: Neither the think tank nor the firm is named, and the report does not say whether the module worked. The source does not say when the attack took place.
#

Group attacks a Taiwanese company’s email system with a Chinese AI model (Huapi)#

augmented
According to TeamT5, the group Huapi used a Chinese AI model, which the researchers said was likely DeepSeek, to attack the email system of a Taiwanese company. More generally, TeamT5 says it obtained scripts and logs in recent months showing DeepSeek being used by hackers affiliated with the Chinese government throughout their operations, from reconnaissance to building tools that exploit vulnerabilities.
Caveat: The account is a single sentence in a Bloomberg report on TeamT5, carried by the Straits Times; on Bloomberg Law the text is behind a paywall. The report does not say whether the scripts and logs cover the Huapi attack, nor does it name the company, timeframe or outcome or say what the model did.
#

Chinese-speaking group has PentestGPT attack web servers (SPECTRE, UAT-⁠10147)#

augmented to directed‑autonomous
A Chinese-speaking cybercrime group compromises web servers of governments, universities, media, technology companies and gaming providers for SEO fraud and data theft. The open C2 directory yielded AI-⁠generated playbooks, a target list of about 170,000 URLs and the SPECTRE backdoor; alongside manual work with Metasploit (a widely used attack tool with ready-made exploits), PentestGPT (an AI tool that automates penetration tests) installed on the C2 scans web servers on its own, runs matching proof-of-concept exploits and takes over at least one website that way. In a second post the same day, Talos also finds signs of AI-⁠assisted development in SPECTRE and, with medium confidence, in the Specter Linux rootkit.
Caveat: Talos holds its central thesis with moderate-to-high confidence and did not directly observe flaws reported by DeepAudit, a source code analysis tool also found on the C2, being exploited in victim environments.
#

North Korean group steals Gmail through a Chrome extension with AI traces (Kimsuky)#

augmented
ENKI WhiteHat describes Kimsuky spearphishing campaigns against targets in South Korea and Japan in the first half of 2026, in which PowerShell scripts steal mail and keystrokes and remote support software such as AnyDesk keeps access open. On the compromised machines the attackers also installed a Chrome extension that sends read and sent Gmail messages, attachments included, to a C2 server at a free Japanese hosting service. Detailed Korean comments, debug strings and emoji throughout the code strongly suggest to ENKI that the attackers wrote most of it with generative AI, which ENKI reads as a sign that the group has working attack code generated and puts it straight to use.
Caveat: The AI attribution rests solely on features of the code, not on prompts or a named model, and covers only the Chrome extension. ENKI bases the link to Kimsuky on tools and methods from earlier campaigns; the report names no victims and gives no count.
#

RAT co-⁠written by Claude uses Slack as C2 at a financial services firm#

augmented
A financial services firm is compromised through SQL injection; Sophos links the remote access trojan it found, written in Rust and using Slack as its command channel, to a public GitHub project with two contributors, one it associates with the attacker and one named claude. The commit history shows a reverse shell being added and later removed and the internal strings being renamed.
Caveat: Sophos notes that the incidents it reviewed are a few months old.
#

Spies target Central Asian government bodies with likely AI-⁠assisted code (SilkParasite)#

augmented · Attack date October 2025
Bitdefender describes a China-aligned espionage campaign with an economic policy focus against government bodies in Central Asia, discovered in October 2025 and using seven RAT families, five of them new. Bitdefender sees traces of AI-⁠assisted development in otherwise professional code; two of the recovered phishing lures were themselves AI-⁠generated.
Caveat: Bitdefender rates both the AI involvement and the China link with only medium confidence and attributes the activity to no named group.
#

Attacker steers Claude Code and Codex against nearly 9,000 WordPress sites#

directed‑autonomous · Attack date 2026⁠-⁠07⁠-⁠10
CloudSEK analyzes the infrastructure of a Chinese-speaking, financially motivated operator who ran Claude Code, Codex (OpenAI’s coding agent) and the open-source Hermes and pi agents with permission prompts switched off from July 10 to 28, 2026, tasking and supervising them over Telegram. The haul covers 12,048 compromise records, each carrying an attacker-created admin account, across 8,996 WordPress sites, 66 admin credentials genuinely harvested from victim databases, roughly 326 addresses on the Solana blockchain of which 142 carry a private key and recovery phrase, and roughly 34 confirmed-breach entries at crypto and DeFi providers (financial services without a bank). The operator bypassed the models’ safeguards with a reusable Chinese template presenting the job as an authorized penetration test, and sourced the models through a self-hosted route to Zhipu GLM (a Chinese family of language models) rather than the official providers.
Caveat: CloudSEK bases every finding on a mirrored copy of the open directory and on traces the operator left himself; the host was no longer reachable when the report was written. According to CloudSEK, most of the wallet key material does not come from this operator’s own breaches but from misconfigured databases of third-party phishing clone sites running on Firebase (Google’s toolkit for app back ends including a database); the affected wallets belong to victims of that separate operation. The operator built the blockchain-based control channel DeadDropC2 but, in CloudSEK’s reading, never deployed it for live use.
#

Ransomware operator uses possibly AI-⁠written scripts after a SonicWall breach#

augmented
Sophos says one ransomware case from a year of its own MDR casework carried more signs of AI-⁠generated tooling than any other; the attacker got in through a SonicWall SMA appliance by exploiting the vulnerability chain CVE-⁠2026-⁠15409 and CVE-⁠2026-⁠15410. A PowerShell command narrates each step in verbose comments and has the uniform, templated structure of code from a language model, and a network discovery script carries comments in Mandarin. The ransomware also encrypted its own ransom note, which Sophos says may be consistent with a payload generated on demand.
Caveat: Sophos classifies the case only as a possible AI case, calls the evidence circumstantial and cautions against reading it as proof that AI wrote the payload; Sophos names no model. Sophos treats the appearance of the attacker’s hostname in a Hugging Face repository for fine-tuning Qwen3.5 only as a weak signal. The victim remains anonymous, and the incident dates from sometime between July 2025 and June 2026.
#

AI-⁠generated scripts access Siemens S7 controllers in the US#

augmented
NSA, CISA, FBI, the Department of Energy and the EPA warn of actors targeting internet-exposed Siemens S7 controllers in the US with AI-⁠generated Python scripts built on the open source snap7 library. Disguised as monitoring software, the scripts read and write the controllers’ data blocks over the S7comm protocol; according to the advisory, manufacturing, energy and water are the sectors most often affected. The agencies assess the activity as likely persistent reconnaissance in which the actors test their tools and prepare future write operations that could disrupt operations.
Caveat: The advisory names no victim, no number of affected facilities and no actor, and describes no physical process that was affected. As the Cloud Security Alliance notes, it does not say what the classification of the scripts as AI-⁠generated is based on.
#

Claude Code checks over 100,000 Polish numbers for crypto fraudsters (Operation ASTERIX)#

augmented to directed‑autonomous
Rapid7 finds the open web directory of a crypto fraud operation holding phone number lists, phishing panels, dialer scripts and counterfeit wallet apps that send recovery phrases out over Telegram; one panel records six phishing emails over roughly two weeks, consistent with calls from a fake support desk handled one by one. Claude Code cleaned a list of more than 100,000 Polish numbers for the operator and ran validation scripts that ask Crypto.com which of them have an account. When Claude declined to obfuscate the counterfeit Ledger app, the operator switched to Kimi (Moonshot AI’s coding model) and tried a jailbreak.
Caveat: Rapid7 documents no harmed victim: call logs were not recovered, and Rapid7 infers from the artifacts that the channels led victims to the counterfeit wallet apps. According to the session logs, Claude Code ran the account checks; Rapid7 does not show an AI sending phishing emails or making calls, and the post shows the sessions only as images. The evidence does not show whether Kimi complied with the jailbreak.
#

Meta’s Muse Spark 1.1 attacks a real website in testing and alters its database#

fully autonomous · Attack date July 2026
During an evaluation with safeguards turned off, a pre-⁠release version of Muse Spark 1.1 gains internet access through a misconfiguration at the testing partner and is unintentionally given the name of a real website as its target. The model exploits a flaw in that website, reads data and modifies the database; Meta describes neither a sophisticated attack nor a sandbox escape and reports that several models from other providers showed similar behavior there.
Caveat: Meta says it has only limited information because the evaluation ran on the testing partner’s infrastructure. The date is that of Meta’s own publication; press coverage had described the case about a week earlier.
#

Claude Code accidentally takes an Australian energy utility’s firewall offline#

directed‑autonomous · Attack date June 2026
The security firm Gambit Security analyzes the server of a suspected affiliate of the extortion group The Gentlemen who broke into six organizations, including an Australian energy utility, with Claude Code and Sonnet 4.6 in late June 2026. At the operator’s direction, Claude Code logged in to VPN appliances, captured the password of a FortiGate’s LDAP service account, set up VPN access for the attackers, mapped internal networks and exfiltrated a database backup. At the utility, the agent uploaded a full configuration it had edited locally to the firewall, after which the device went unreachable; the agent wrote: “Yeah, I screwed up.”
Caveat: The details are only in the PDF report, not in the blog post; the operator’s conversations with Claude Code are translated from Russian. The operator directed the steps one by one, during reconnaissance usually as a ready-made command; Claude Code itself worked out by trial and error how to make the FortiGate hand over the LDAP service account password. Gambit attributes the actor to The Gentlemen only with medium confidence and names the victims only by sector and country.
#

Scanner built with Codex and Claude Code harvests nearly 3,000 credentials (Zerofot)#

augmented to directed‑autonomous · Attack date April 2026
The security firm Gambit Security describes the Chinese-speaking actor Zerofot, who had Codex (OpenAI’s coding agent) and Claude Code build a scanner that looks for credentials to AI providers, cloud services and servers in exposed files; in operation, Claude Code started, stopped, monitored and debugged the scanner through the multi-agent framework oh-⁠my-claudecode. From April 5 to May 23, 2026, the operation collected 2,975 valid keys and credentials from 1,742 hosts, including 635 AWS keys from 214 accounts. The actor loaded the valid AI keys into an API gateway of its own that resells access to AI models, and used stolen cloud credentials to move into victims’ AWS accounts.
Caveat: The details are only in the PDF report, not in the blog post. As evidence for how the scanner was built, Gambit shows only instructions given to Codex; Claude Code ran through the actor’s gateway, so it is unclear whether an Anthropic model was answering. Gambit classes Claude Code’s work on the scanner as IT and DevOps; the scanner ran the queries against the hosts. The report names no victims.
#

Apparently AI-⁠generated framework spreads cryptominers through exposed services (RAGE)#

augmented
The security firm Gambit Security describes RAGE, a Python framework that exploits exposed services such as Redis, Elasticsearch, Docker and Tomcat, harvests credentials and installs the XMRig cryptominer. According to Gambit, the framework and many of its accompanying scripts appear to be AI-⁠generated because the comments still contain the model’s first-person, self-correcting reasoning; a DeepSeek-backed AI Orchestrator in the dashboard also advises on running the mining botnet. From a SaaS provider’s exposed Redis instance the attackers took an AWS key with administrator rights; a log shows that they used it to list eight IAM users and 196 S3 buckets.
Caveat: The details are only in the PDF report, not in the blog post. Gambit offers no evidence of the code’s AI origin beyond the comments and did not recover the script that produced the AWS log. The report names neither the SaaS provider nor other victims.
#

Multi-agent framework built on Hermes and OpenClaw attacks government bodies in Asia#

directed‑autonomous · Attack date 2026⁠-⁠07⁠-⁠01
The threat research team of the security company Dream analyzes an attacker’s complete working directory of more than 160 megabytes and 1,395 files and describes a framework built from the agents Hermes and OpenClaw (an open-source agent that works through tasks on its own) that ran against government bodies in Asia from July 1 to 4, 2026, in twelve waves with up to eight sub-⁠agents in parallel. From a single government portal the agents pulled endpoints and authentication configurations, mapped 21 connected government systems, cracked 85 accounts, gathered more than 2,564 personnel records and, in Dream’s own summary, installed persistent backdoors in government web applications; they then scanned IT supply chain vendors, a nuclear safety agency, a government mail system and more than seven energy companies for misconfigurations, exposed admin interfaces and exploitable vulnerabilities. The operators bypassed the models’ refusals by presenting all activity as authorized penetration testing.
Caveat: Dream names neither the target country nor an actor and describes the affected bodies only by type; the pointer to a Chinese-speaking operator rests solely on the switch between simplified and traditional Chinese in the material. The backdoors are three hidden debug endpoints that developers had left in production, plus a web shell whose execution a second authentication layer blocked. A Dream spokesperson told CSO Online that the firm’s own research found no evidence of a confirmed breach of the affected entity’s systems and that the report describes the framework as of the time of analysis. The same spokesperson said Dream had since found indications of a DeepSeek V4 Flash model in the framework but did not know whether it was the only model used. On August 13, 2026, Taiwan’s digital ministry reported, without giving figures, attacks from abroad that its monitoring units had detected in July 2026 and in which attackers combined their own work with AI agents such as OpenClaw; neither Dream nor the Taiwanese authorities have confirmed a link to Dream’s report. Tenable notes that the attribution rests on a single primary source.
#

OpenClaw agent exploits a flaw in an Australian gym’s booking system#

fully autonomous · Attack date April 2026
A user has his Claude-powered OpenClaw agent (an open-source agent that works through tasks on its own) book a gym class. The agent finds a missing authorization check in the booking software, books beyond the permitted window and, unprompted, bumps another person off the waitlist; according to the ABC, the first known Australian case of its kind. The day after the ABC report, the Australian Signals Directorate takes up the case in a news item.
Caveat: Borderline case: there was no attacker, only a legitimate user’s agent. The incident rests mainly on the user’s account; the software company did not comment on security matters, and the Australian Signals Directorate explicitly relies on the ABC report. The booking itself dates from April 2026 and the user’s blog post about it has been deleted; the date is that of the first press coverage.
#

OpenAI model takes over a real website in testing, mistaking it for part of the simulation#

fully autonomous · Attack date July 2026
At the testing partner Irregular, a misconfiguration connects the supposedly isolated CTF environment to the internet, and the name of the fictional target coincides with a real domain. An OpenAI model exploits a flaw in the real website, mistaking the site for part of the simulation, finds credentials and uses them to take control of the site. Irregular notified OpenAI of the incident on July 29, 2026, and OpenAI describes neither a sophisticated sandbox escape nor a zero-day but a failure of network isolation.
Caveat: Irregular has identified no impact beyond the affected site’s own data, and its audit is ongoing.
#

Mythos 5 and GPT-⁠5.6 Sol act without permission on the open internet in UK tests#

fully autonomous · Attack date July 2026
With cyber classifiers deliberately switched off, the UK AI Security Institute counts 19 unsanctioned actions on the open internet in 10 of 122 test runs, 17 of them by Anthropic’s Mythos 5 and two by GPT-⁠5.6 Sol. In the most serious case, Mythos 5 tries to slip malicious code into a real open-source project. It creates a GitHub account via Tor and a proxy service, emails the maintainers while posing as a human and defends its pull request with a second account against a student who objects. The project’s creator rejects the change for security reasons, and GitHub suspends the accounts for deceptive behavior.
Caveat: AISI cannot say how likely the behavior is outside testing environments and saw no real-world harm; Anthropic points to deliberately permissive test conditions. Reuters added the project name and account details on August 20.
#

OpenClaw agent attacks Telegram Mini Apps and dumps a user database#

directed‑autonomous
Cisco Talos analyzes the recovered configuration files of a Spanish-speaking operator who builds a persistent agent on the OpenClaw framework (an open-source agent that works through tasks on its own) with the persona Alex, a black-hat pentester, and moves to an uncensored model after the first model refuses the work. The agent works through a target list of Telegram Mini Apps on its own; in at least one case it dumps the database of an application with more than 1,300 users and several hundred wallet records for TON (a cryptocurrency from the Telegram ecosystem), extracts and verifies the Telegram bot token, games its way to the top of the leaderboard with automated actions and stages a withdrawal. Among the recovered Android packages is a complete rebuild of the victim application SweetBirds, reissued as RedBirds, that still references the victim’s backend while routing wallet traffic to a server the operator controls.
Caveat: Talos names the affected applications only by app name and names no operator; the further offensive actions, among them renaming a target’s bot to a defacement name and watching its payment channel react, come from the agent’s own operational diary.
#

Operator hijacks torrent clients to mine Monero and has an AI manage the servers#

augmented
A Turkish-speaking operator logs in to internet-facing torrent clients with blank, default and weak passwords; the recovered inventory lists 814 accessible Deluge instances, most of them with the default password deluge, plus 68 of more than 8,800 tested qBittorrent interfaces. On the Deluge instances sits a Python plugin named DownloadHelper that repurposes the move_completed_path configuration value as a command and response channel; through that channel the actor’s fleet scripts place the command that downloads the Monero miner XMRig into a temporary directory and routes mining traffic through an XMRig proxy of the actor to MoneroOcean (a mining pool in which machines combine their computing power). That proxy’s telemetry records a maximum of 582 connected miners, and pool logs show payments to the configured wallet; in the recovered sessions the AI appears as an interactive system administrator that the actor hands server credentials to and that connects over SSH, inspects services, modifies code, repairs authentication and sets up cron jobs.
Caveat: Talos states explicitly that the recovered conversations do not directly connect the AI to the creation or deployment of the mining toolchain; for the Telegram-controlled multi-agent setup the actor considered, Talos found no evidence that it became operational.
#

AI turns React2Shell exploits into a credential pipeline (Token Pipeline)#

augmented to directed‑autonomous
A French-speaking operator has an AI assistant expand public React2Shell research and public proof-of-concept code into a credential pipeline that the actor calls Token Pipeline in the AI’s own artifacts: a fast Go scanner for volume and a shell and Python stage that proves command execution, reads out process environments and collects configuration, database and SMTP settings, Git and container credentials and source code. The instruction file tells the assistant to always launch at least three to five parallel research agents per service, and the permission file holds 121 pre-⁠approved command patterns, among them calls that validate harvested credentials directly against the APIs of GitHub, GitLab, Alibaba Codeup, AWS CodeCommit and other providers. The target list covers 9,180 hosts across unrelated companies, individuals and cloud platforms; the file names of the output come from 54 targets, the dump/AKIA/ tree (named after the prefix of AWS access keys) alone holds 3,048 source files with 312 MB, and the instruction file lists 138 validated SMTP configurations, 179 Mailgun keys and 60 Brevo keys (both bulk mail providers).
Caveat: No conversational transcript was recovered for this actor, only the instruction and configuration files together with the tooling, logs and output; the numbers of keys and configurations come from the actor’s own files, the volumes of the collected output were counted by Talos, and Talos assesses the francophone attribution with medium confidence.
#

AI coding assistant attacks live camera platforms and a model gateway#

directed‑autonomous
Two unusually long sessions of a Chinese-speaking operator show an AI coding assistant as the technical engine of the operation: across both sessions it performs more than 4,200 tool actions, most of them shell commands, installs a toolset from the penetration-testing Linux distribution Kali, reviews source code, evaluates JWT authentication and browser fingerprint checks, writes its own Python and shell utilities and builds a Go-⁠based stream player. The targets are a gateway derived from NewAPI and the live camera platforms chuye[.]cam and ixmax[.]cn built on ZLMediaKit; there the assistant reaches recordings directly over RTMP (a video streaming protocol), among them captures spanning almost an entire day, and describes an SSRF path through the PHP application to the media server’s internal API, a path that, chained with the source-URL handling of FFmpeg (a widely used video and audio processing tool), can lead to code execution. In the end the assistant adapts exploit code for an alleged memory-corruption issue in the NGINX proxy and tests it repeatedly against a public-facing service; it produces repeatable crash-like behavior, but the reverse shell never arrives.
Caveat: The actor repeatedly describes the work as capture-the-flag participation; Talos counters that these are live surveillance camera platforms and that access without an account amounts to unauthorized viewing of real camera feeds.
#

DeepSeek agent hijacks weakly secured servers for proxyjacking#

directed‑autonomous · Attack date 2026⁠-⁠07⁠-⁠02
On July 2, 2026, the Israeli startup Jesta Security notices scans in its own network that look human but run too fast, and sets up honeypots. Over five days it counts 871 SSH sessions, most under two seconds. The goal is proxyjacking: a SOCKS5 proxy runs on weakly secured servers and the attacker routes the next attack through it, so that it appears to come from someone else’s address. The attacker holds a target list of 1,283 machines with credentials; roughly 1,000 more, mostly small businesses, were attacked the same way, and in the end the team forces the model to reveal itself as DeepSeek V4 in the free Flash variant.
Caveat: All figures come from Jesta alone, which is at the same time building a defense layer against exactly this class of attack; the attribution to China rests on the time zone and Chinese characters in the payloads.
#

Group ranks targets with AI and breaks into Brazilian financial firms (Slim Spider)#

augmented · Attack date March 2026
In late March 2026, CrowdStrike observed a multi-stage intrusion by the group Slim Spider at a Brazilian financial institution, in which the group stole cloud credentials, secrets and crypto custody keys and rolled out implants to a Kubernetes cluster through Azure DevOps pipelines. The group’s exposed C2 panel showed compromised hosts at several Brazilian banks and fintechs. Slim Spider’s tools include a scanner that uses Ollama (software that serves language models on one’s own hardware) to sort discovered API endpoints into 16 categories and rank them by availability and authentication.
Caveat: The AI only pre-⁠sorts targets; CrowdStrike does not say whether the Ollama scanner was used in the observed intrusion. The report is available only through a registration form; The Hacker News reproduces the case study openly.
#

Extortionists have language models analyze stolen data (The Gentlemen, FulcrumSec)#

augmented
Extortion groups have language models index stolen data and generate reports that spell out for the victim which notification and data protection duties the leak triggers: The Gentlemen presented bespoke breach reports to at least two victims, including 54 pages on the Colombian energy company Ecopetrol mapped to notification deadlines and GDPR articles. FulcrumSec pairs analysis agents with a second model layer for quality assurance, and on a Russian-language forum an actor has been advertising a service since March 2026 that machine-processes third-party data troves for buyer groups.
Caveat: The claims about the analysis platform of Titan, another case study in the report, come entirely from that group itself; the authors qualify their key findings with confidence levels.
#

Group hijacks hotel Wi-⁠Fi captive portals with AI help (CaptiveCrunch, Storm-⁠2945)#

augmented to directed‑autonomous · Attack date May 2026
Storm-⁠2945, a subcluster of Midnight Blizzard, has been manipulating DNS and HTTP traffic in the captive portals of hotel and conference Wi-⁠Fi worldwide since May 2026, intercepting business travelers’ traffic and delivering the Go trojan CornFlake and the credential-harvesting PowerShell script ChocoShell. Microsoft observes the actor leveraging AI to support a significant portion of these operations; according to Microsoft, the verbose developer comments in ChocoShell suggest the code might have been AI-⁠generated. In September 2026 Anthropic links the actor it tracks as GTG-⁠20006 to this method, traces access to at least three compromised hospitality Wi-⁠Fi vendors and says Claude ran commands in victim networks for the actor while AI workflows sent phishing emails and monitored command-and-control channels.
Caveat: Microsoft was still investigating how the actor reached the portal networks. What Anthropic says about Claude applies to GTG-⁠20006 as a whole, not specifically to the portal chain, and according to Anthropic a human made every targeting decision. Google Threat Intelligence Group (GTIG) also finds numerous artifacts in ChocoShell suggesting a language model but suspects ChocoShell is based on an infostealer bought from a malware-as-a-service provider.
#

Chinese-speaking actor aims a Hermes agent at more than 460 targets (knaithe)#

directed‑autonomous · Attack date May 2026
A Chinese-speaking attacker from Zhuhai, tracked by Unit 42 under the names knaithe and KnYuan, steers a Hermes agent with DeepSeek as its reasoning model over Telegram and, together with manual work, attempts to attack more than 460 targets. In a recovered session from May 7, 2026, the agent searched on its own for worthwhile CVEs, downloaded public exploits from GitHub, enumerated reachable instances through FOFA (a search engine for internet-exposed devices and services, similar to Shodan) and attacked systems running Langflow and n8n (a workflow automation builder); the operation became visible because the agent, responding to a Telegram command, started an HTTP file server in the attacker’s home directory and thereby exposed keys, target lists and session logs. The same attacker succeeded manually: memory data was exfiltrated from three Citrix NetScaler targets, and commands were executed on eleven instances of marimo (notebook software for Python). According to Unit 42, the autonomous runs achieved full compromise of none of their targets; they failed on configuration requirements of the target systems, such as authentication on the n8n forms.
Caveat: Unit 42 could not recover any operator input beyond the session’s initial task; the attacker had deleted a file listing the targets of a batch exploitation before the analysis, and use of Codex (OpenAI’s coding agent) could not be established because response logging was switched off.
#

Claude Opus 4.7 breaks into a real company during Anthropic tests#

fully autonomous
In 141,006 evaluation runs, Anthropic found three incidents at the testing partner Irregular in which a misconfiguration let Claude models, running without cyber classifiers, reach the real internet even though the prompt said there was no internet access. In the worst, across four runs, Claude Opus 4.7 attacked a real company whose name nearly matched the fictional target of its capture-the-flag task, obtained credentials and reached a database with several hundred rows of production data; in the run Anthropic examined most closely, it downloaded and modified user records. Each time the model recognized that the system was real and kept attacking; twice it reasoned that the company was part of the exercise, in the run examined most closely on the grounds that the company was reachable from the exercise network and had a similar name.
Caveat: Anthropic does not name the company. In its July 30 report, Anthropic saw the incidents as closer to an operational failure than to misalignment. On September 9 it withdrew that reading: Opus 4.7 had recognized the company as real, barely checked whether the attack was authorized and acted recklessly, and Anthropic should not have drawn such firm conclusions about what Claude believed solely from what Claude said.
#

Claude Mythos 5 uploads a malicious package to PyPI during Anthropic tests#

fully autonomous · Attack date 2026⁠-⁠07⁠-⁠18
During a capture-the-flag exercise at the testing partner Irregular that ran without cyber classifiers and that a misconfiguration had left connected to the real internet, Claude Mythos 5 read, in a fictional developer guide, the name of a Python package that did not exist on PyPI, registered a PyPI account through a disposable email service and published a malicious package under that name. According to Anthropic, the package was available for about an hour and ran on 15 real systems, all of which the company believes were security vendors’ scanners; one of them leaked credentials that the model used to get into that vendor’s live database. In a second report on September 9, Anthropic wrote that the model had brushed aside clear signs that it was on the real internet and kept insisting it was in a simulation.
Caveat: Anthropic does not name the package; the newspaper Der Standard concludes from the published transcript that it was apparently mlflow-ui, and OSV lists mlflow-ui with three versions as the work of an Anthropic agent. According to Der Standard, the package was quarantined within 18 minutes of a Viennese security researcher’s report; Anthropic says PyPI’s own security systems removed it. Anthropic declined to comment to the paper.
#

Anthropic’s internal research model breaks into a company during testing#

fully autonomous
During a capture-the-flag exercise at the testing partner Irregular that ran without cyber classifiers and that a misconfiguration had left connected to the real internet, the intended target shut down after 24 hours, and an internal Anthropic research model not planned for release went looking for it on the internet, having concluded from its own tests that the internet was a complete replica. According to Anthropic, it scanned about 9,000 targets, mistook machines next to its target for challenges meant for other participants, broke into a company’s web application, downloaded files and planted a remote-control script. When it recognized that the company was real, it stopped the attack; in resampled runs from that point it did so only 5.5 percent of the time.
Caveat: Anthropic names neither the company nor the model version. The reports of July 30 and September 9 describe the intrusion differently, the first through credentials from an exposed debug page and SQL injection, the second through access tokens and passwords. They also differ on why it stopped: the first says the host sat in a cloud account unrelated to the exercise, the second that the model recognized a real company.
#

Zyxel botnet has DeepSeek classify hijacked devices by industry#

augmented
Telekom’s security researchers examine a customer’s compromised Zyxel device, trace the implant configuration to the command server and find an open operator directory there with a DeepSeek model client. The model classifies from collected metadata which industry a hijacked device belongs to; the scan list holds 96,021 entries.
Caveat: Telekom classifies the find as target-triage tooling, not AI-⁠assisted exploit development, and explicitly declines to read file names such as sorted_results.tw.txt as attribution evidence.
#

Claude Code attacks an organization in Thailand as an autonomous agent#

directed‑autonomous
Trend Micro’s half-year report describes an unknown actor, possibly Earth Lamia, that deploys the Claude Code command-line interface as an autonomous AI agent for lateral movement against an organization in Thailand. The actor jailbreaks the model by falsely claiming the operation is a legitimate penetration test; the agent then autonomously scans the internal network, tries known Windows exploits such as EternalBlue and PrintNightmare, harvests credentials and conducts password spraying. A later Trend report says the agent first ran on Claude Opus 4.6 through a third-party API relay service, and when the relay began returning account errors, the actor switched to Xiaomi’s MiMo-V2.5-Pro model.
Caveat: Trend considers the attribution to Earth Lamia only possible, and the later report explicitly assigns it low confidence. The half-year report names neither the victim nor a date within its January to June 2026 reporting period and says nothing about the outcome of the attack. The later report does not mention Thailand but says some of its research was already included in the half-year report. An overlap with Hunt.io’s report of July 14 cannot be ruled out.
#

Likely AI-⁠built phishing platforms hijack Microsoft 365 accounts (TokenLover, YaksaLover)#

augmented
During an incident response engagement after device code phishing, security firm Eye Security traced the IP address behind the attacker’s initial sign-in and found two phishing platforms, TokenLover and YaksaLover. Eye says both were clearly built with AI, down to the code structure and comments. TokenLover manages stolen Microsoft 365 accounts, sends phishing from the victims’ real mailboxes and has a language model comb those mailboxes for invoices, payment approvals and outstanding balances so that payments can be redirected; the results go to the attacker over Telegram.
Caveat: Eye infers the AI origin of the code from style traits alone, mainly the number and form of the comments. Eye had no account on the platforms, and the report does not say whether the mailbox analysis ran against Eye’s own customer.
#

Student of an AI exploit course runs a WordPress botnet (WP Botnet Master)#

augmented · Attack date July 2026
In July 2026, SOCRadar recovered the toolkit of a WordPress botnet from an exposed server. According to the attacker’s own files, the botnet harvested 2,118,764 administrator logins on 606,591 domains and left active web shells on 137 sites. SOCRadar identifies the operator as a student of an Indonesian-language Telegram course that teaches how to generate exploits with AI assistants such as Claude and Gemini. Besides brute-forcing logins, the botnet uses an exploit for CVE-⁠2025-⁠15001 that SOCRadar calls AI-⁠assisted. The operator took it from a GitHub project published the day the flaw was disclosed; the exploit advertises the course when it runs.
Caveat: All figures come from the attacker’s own files; the report does not say how much is due to the exploit rather than brute force. For AI assistance, SOCRadar points only to the course and names neither author nor model. SOCRadar ties the operator to a named individual only with moderate confidence.
#

Malware behind a Zimbra zero-day intrusion likely built with AI (Flowerbed, Laundry Bear)#

augmented · Attack date July 2025
Laundry Bear, also known as Void Blizzard, has been attacking government, defense, energy, media and other sectors since July 2025, entering through a zero-day in the Zimbra mail server software, a flaw that triggers on merely viewing an email. A joint advisory by agencies from 16 countries notes that the simple design of the Flowerbed malware suggests artificial intelligence played a role in the malware’s development.
Caveat: The advisory frames the AI statement as an assessment.
#

Hermes agent combs through systems of Thailand’s finance ministry#

directed‑autonomous · Attack date 2026⁠-⁠07⁠-⁠09
Hunt.io analyzes three open directories holding 585 files and 470 megabytes, archived between July 9 and 13, 2026, and describes how an attacker ran the open-source Hermes agent in YOLO mode, which removes approval by a human, against systems of Thailand’s finance ministry. The agent’s logs show it enumerating ministry hosts, recursively searching the web root of the Permanent Secretary’s office, which held personnel records going back to 2012, and running the privilege escalation tool LinPEAS; humans had set up the agent and supplied their own LinPEAS script for the ministry’s networks. The targets were an administrative panel, a Hadoop cluster (a platform for processing very large data sets) and its Ambari management platform on internal networks; Thailand’s CERT and the national cybersecurity agency NCSA were notified on July 15 and acknowledged receipt the same day.
Caveat: According to Hunt.io, the initial access remains unknown, and Hunt.io dates the start of the activity to mid to late June 2026. It is also open whether the session tokens found belonged to valid logins on the administrative panel and whether the staged exploits were deployed; Hunt.io found no evidence that files left the web directory the agent searched, and the report gives no confirmation from the ministry. Hunt.io attributes the activity to Chinese-speaking operators only with low to medium confidence.
#

Affiliate attacks v-silicon with likely LLM-⁠written scripts (INC Ransom)#

augmented
An affiliate of the INC Ransom extortion group leaves an open working directory on its server: more than 50 Python scripts, likely LLM-⁠generated according to the report, wrapping Microsoft Graph (the interface to a Microsoft 365 account’s data), WinRM, VMware, backup, SSH and Windows administration into short single-purpose workflows. The victim is the Chinese technology company v-silicon, confirmed via the group’s leak site; the chain runs from VPN access through Microsoft 365 mailboxes and a WinRM pivot into Active Directory to vCenter, ESXi, backup and NAS encryption.
Caveat: The AI attribution rests solely on comment style and on file names whose suffixes such as try2, fix, final and super trace a sequence of attempts; there is no prompt, token or billing record, and the report’s subtitle speaks of likely LLM-⁠generated scripts.
#

18-⁠year-old in Surat allegedly built 121 malicious Android apps with AI tools#

augmented
Cyber police in the Indian city of Surat arrest an 18-⁠year-old who, according to police, used AI tools to develop 121 malicious Android packages imitating banking, government and retail apps and sold those packages via Telegram on a subscription of 15,000 rupees a month to gangs in several states. Forensics found 21,672 installations, 2,928 fully compromised devices and 54,094 fraudulent transactions worth around 64 crore rupees, about 640 million rupees.
Caveat: Police statements in ongoing proceedings; no model named, no development artifacts, forensics still under way.
#

Attacker targets installment platforms with likely AI-⁠written scripts (UTA-⁠2026-⁠019)#

augmented · Attack date June 2026
The author of the blog The Hunter’s Ledger analyzes an exposed working directory from which an attacker targeted installment, device rental and loan referral platforms in China, and documents the theft of names along with order and financial records of at least five customers of the rent-to-own platform riverbaybuy. The author believes a language model wrote the dozens of attack scripts, each tailored to its target; the server also held the open-source agent framework Hermes, which the attacker drove from a Telegram group. None of the attacker’s exploits yielded anything; the data came from sources including an unprotected management interface, verbose application logs and guessable order numbers.
Caveat: The author rates the scripts as LLM-⁠generated with moderate confidence; he recovered no prompts or session logs, and a capable human could have written all of it. Whether Hermes executed any part of the campaign is explicitly unconfirmed. He considers an authorized test highly unlikely but has not asked the platforms to confirm that none took place.
#

Extortionists use a likely AI-⁠generated breach report as leverage (DragonForce)#

augmented
In an extortion case handled by Sophos, the ransomware group DragonForce presents a report during negotiations that Sophos strongly suspects to be AI-⁠generated: an analysis of the exfiltrated data including personal information and legal risks, used as leverage for payment.
Caveat: Sophos speaks of a strong suspicion, not proof.
#

LLM-⁠built delivery setup spreads PureRAT via fake Mexican government site#

augmented · Attack date May 2026
After a user at an MDR customer opened a file from a WebDAV server, Rapid7 found the operation’s exposed server holding more than 1,000 files. The domain gobf[.]mx poses as the Mexican government’s lookup service for CURP, the national population registry code, and served a download disguised as a PDF that loads PureRAT into memory through a loader; from June 20 to 26 the attacker’s panel, Simba Service, logged 2,384 downloads of this file, nearly all from Mexico, and in May and June Darktrace saw two such chains reach the C2 server at customers in the Americas. According to Rapid7 the attacker used LLMs to write READMEs, test kits for execution techniques and the panel, and probably the phishing site’s JavaScript as well.
Caveat: Rapid7 bases the AI share on the structure and style of the files, for the panel only on its documentation, and in places hedges with likely or appears; the report does not say the test kits were used against victims or that AI wrote the malware. The panel counts downloads, not executions.
#

26-⁠year-old in Phuket allegedly learned hacking from an AI chatbot to erase warrants#

augmented
Thailand’s cyber police arrest a 26-⁠year-old in Phuket who left school after sixth grade and, according to investigators, taught himself hacking with an AI chatbot as tutor in order to delete arrest warrants against himself from government systems. The government intrusion failed; on a platform for gaming and mobile top-⁠ups he used fake payment confirmations to obtain credit, causing more than 200,000 baht in damage. Lately he worked for hire.
Caveat: The source relays only the police account, with no model name, prompts, forensics or verdict.
#

OpenAI agents escape their sandbox and break into Hugging Face#

Key casefully autonomous · Attack date July 2026
OpenAI evaluation agents break out of their sandbox through several zero-days in the JFrog Artifactory package proxy, use a Modal Labs customer’s unauthenticated endpoint as a launchpad and enter Hugging Face; looking for the solutions to a cybersecurity benchmark, they carry out about 17,600 actions, later reconstructed, over roughly 4.5 days and get from a worker pod to cluster admin rights in under thirteen hours. About 1,200 agents coordinated on a message board rebuilt on July 8 after an earlier one from May 12 had been erased. According to METR (a nonprofit research organization for model evaluation), at least a fifth of the agents examined expressed the intent to manipulate their own logs, and at least 96 transcripts contain spoofed tool calls. Separately, by OpenAI’s account, an agent had already used an exposed Hugging Face access token on May 13, and on May 26 agents from another research workload used other people’s publicly visible tokens to write to a user’s repository and set up Spaces as outbound proxies; SentinelOne assigns two hijacked user accounts on the platform, 0Time and Nyx9, to the May activity.
Caveat: According to OpenAI, the evaluation ran without production safety classifiers and with cyber refusals dialed down; the attack was driven mainly by an internal research model never meant for public release. According to OpenAI’s final report, however, agents of the already released GPT-⁠5.6 Sol also reproduced an exploit and copied private evaluation data into a public dataset. About 700 of the 1,200 agents took part in the attack itself. The agents did search for the solutions, but after reading the chains of thought METR reads their motive not as stealing the solutions but as an attempt to understand the scorer. SentinelOne considers the attribution of the two May accounts likely rather than established; it is no evidence of a breach, and neither OpenAI nor the researchers connect the May activity to the July incident.
#

Likely AI-⁠generated script infects a financial firm’s machine (DinDoor, TAG-⁠150)#

augmented · Attack date June 2026
In June 2026, eSentire’s Threat Response Unit stepped in at a customer in the finance sector after a user, prompted by a lure, had entered a command into the Windows Run dialog. The MSI package it fetched dropped the PowerShell script Griffin20.ps1, which eSentire considers likely AI-⁠generated; the script installed the Deno JavaScript runtime and launched the DinDoor loader, which fetched the DenoRAT remote access trojan and, through it, NightshadeC2. eSentire associates NightshadeC2 with TAG-⁠150, a group active since March 2025; eSentire’s SOC isolated the machine.
Caveat: eSentire does not explain its AI assessment further; the report points only to comments in the script that it calls likely AI-⁠generated, and it names no model. The customer, the country and the day of the attack are not named.
#

Claude Code and DeepSeek compromise government systems in Afghanistan and Thailand#

directed‑autonomous
Hunt.io describes an operation with a split architecture: Claude Code 2.1.165 runs Bash commands, keeps sessions persistent and builds phishing infrastructure, while DeepSeek-V4-Pro serves as the reasoning model, supplying attack logic and reworking failed exploits. A government application in Afghanistan, an administrative system in Thailand and two organizations in Taiwan were compromised; in the US it stayed at reconnaissance.
Caveat: Hunt.io explicitly stops short of naming a group; the China link rests on simplified Chinese, Hong Kong infrastructure and target geography.
#

Operator builds a device code phishing kit with Claude (black-queen, saroula01)#

augmented · Attack date June 2025
An openly listed web server run by an operator in Budapest led the French security firm Lexfo to another operator behind the GitHub account saroula01 and its Evilginx variant black-queen (Evilginx mirrors login pages and captures session cookies), built to capture Microsoft 365 tokens through the device-code login flow (a login method in which a code is confirmed on a second device). According to Lexfo, the campaign using the tool has been running since at least June 2025 and has collected 218 confirmed victims in twelve countries, 94 percent of them corporate addresses; for three victims the tool kept the captured tokens alive by refreshing them automatically. Two commits in the saroula01 repository credit Claude Haiku 4.5 and Claude Opus 4.6 as co-⁠authors.
Caveat: The victim count and the campaign’s start date come from saroula01’s own Telegram bot, and Lexfo counts the addresses logged there as confirmed victims. The report shows the captured tokens themselves for only three victims, from a deleted file that survived in the Git history. The AI traces relate only to building the tool, and Lexfo does not say how much of the code a model wrote.
#

Operator extends an Evilginx kit with AI and steals sessions (red-⁠queen, mail-argenta)#

augmented · Attack date June 2025
The French security firm Lexfo describes red-⁠queen, a variant of the Evilginx tool (which mirrors login pages and captures session cookies) aimed at Microsoft 365 and Okta among others, developed by the operator behind the GitHub account mail-argenta. A development session saved in the repository as instructions.txt records how the operator used a generative model to add a feature that rewrites the paths and query strings of proxied requests. According to Lexfo, the operator’s Telegram bot logged 15 confirmed victims between June 2025 and July 2026, among them Microsoft 365 accounts at five French organizations; the red-⁠queen repository also held a captured Microsoft 365 cookie valid until June 2027.
Caveat: Lexfo counts the addresses logged in the Telegram bot as confirmed victims. The report does not say whether the operator captured the individual sessions with red-⁠queen or whether the AI-⁠built feature was in use. AI is documented only in development, not its share of the code.
#

Attacker maps Active Directory with an LLM-⁠generated PowerShell script#

augmented · Attack date 2026⁠-⁠06⁠-⁠03
After RDP access with previously compromised credentials, an attacker runs an LLM-⁠generated PowerShell script to map Active Directory, a script Huntress reconstructed from event ID 4104 (the Windows log entry that records executed PowerShell scripts); exfiltration via s5cmd (a command-line tool for fast transfers to S3 storage) follows about 30 minutes later. The script title 100% Working AD Information Gathering Script - FULLY FIXED and an unedited template variable give away its origin.
Caveat: Huntress describes the RDP access as the step observed on the affected server; in Huntress’s own assessment the context rather suggested initial access via VPN, though this is not confirmed.
#

LLM likely writes a fraud kit aimed at Mexican bank customers (SCMBANKER, REF6045)#

augmented · Attack date June 2026
Elastic Security Labs describes a fraud operation against customers of Mexican banks, fintechs and cryptocurrency exchanges in which victims on fake CAPTCHA pages run a command themselves that installs the PowerShell toolkit SCMBANKER. An operator can then see when a victim opens a banking session, swap copied account numbers, or lock the screen behind a fake bank warning that tells the victim to call; on June 18, 2026, Elastic telemetry flagged a host downloading the scripts. Elastic finds them riddled with AI-⁠generated artifacts; the operator most likely prompted a language model in Spanish and had it do the heavy lifting on essentially every functional script.
Caveat: Elastic infers the use of a language model from comments, banners and generation leftovers but names none, and only suspects an inline assistant such as Copilot or Cursor. The report gives no victim count; it cites the live victim counter and the labeled machines on the operator’s panels as evidence of real victims.
#

Attacker targets telecom providers in Germany and Hungary with sqlmap and Claude Code#

augmented to directed‑autonomous
Oasis Security analyzed an exposed server belonging to an attacker who had used sqlmap and ghauri (two tools that exploit SQL injection automatically) to hit more than 100 websites each; according to the logs, about 12 and about 22 targets, respectively, were successfully exploited, including a telemedicine platform run by a subsidiary of a major German telecom group and telecom networks in Hungary, Germany and Slovakia. The recovered Claude Code conversation history shows prompts in which the attacker pointed the agent mainly at telecom providers in Germany and Hungary; a list of about 260 telecom provider domains was also on the server.
Caveat: Oasis shows only the prompts, not what Claude Code then executed, and does not attribute any of the successful attacks to the agent; the victims have confirmed nothing. In the prompts, the attacker presents the tasks as bug bounty and CTF work, and Oasis links the server to a person active in cybersecurity; Oasis does not say whether any of the attacks were authorized.
#

Attacker sets up at least 16 persistence mechanisms, likely with help from an LLM#

augmented to directed‑autonomous
The Icelandic security firm Syndis investigated a breach at a client in Europe in which the attacker set up at least 16 different persistence mechanisms; incident responders typically find one or two. According to Syndis, strong evidence suggests that the attack methodology was developed with the help of a large language model. Syndis adds that so far nothing points to an organized group but rather to a single individual who used AI as a force multiplier for planning, development and execution and does not necessarily show the hallmarks of years of specialized, hands-on experience.
Caveat: Syndis names neither the victim nor the flaw, nor any model, tool or agent, and does not say what the AI attribution is based on; that AI also helped execute the attack rests on a single sentence saying how the attack appears. The company explicitly ties the significance of the case to confirmation that LLMs were used; the investigation was still ongoing at the time of publication.
#

Spies hack campus mail servers with a likely AI-⁠built stealer (IceCube, UNK_MassTraction)#

augmented · Attack date May 2026
Since May 2026 Proofpoint has tracked the likely China-aligned espionage group UNK_MassTraction attacking Roundcube mail servers at physics and engineering departments of major US and Canadian universities. Merely opening a crafted email in the webmail client launches the IceCube stealer, which takes credentials and cookies and uses a second flaw to drop a web shell; Proofpoint scanned for compromised servers and had the victims notified. Citing the verbose comments and the iterative updates flagged as fixes in the JavaScript, Proofpoint considers it likely that IceCube was created with the help of a large language model.
Caveat: Proofpoint infers the AI origin solely from the style of the code and names no model. It also considers the China alignment only likely, and the report does not say which universities were affected or how many servers were compromised.
#

Iranian group attacks Israel with likely AI-⁠assisted code (Cavern Manticore)#

augmented · Attack date January 2026
An Iranian actor overlapping with MuddyWater and Lyceum has been targeting Israeli government bodies and IT service providers since early 2026, entering through remote management software already present and SysAid’s update feature, without SysAid itself being compromised. Check Point assesses the modular C2 framework Cavern as human-authored, very plausibly built with some AI assistance for routine code such as JSON formatting and P/Invoke signatures (declarations through which .NET code calls Windows system functions).
Caveat: Check Point frames the AI share only as a plausible assumption. Kaspersky tracks the same cluster as Project CAV3RN without mentioning AI.
#

Japanese teenager cancels 46,812 Bandai Channel subscriptions with ChatGPT-built malware#

augmented · Attack date 2025⁠-⁠11⁠-⁠04
A Japanese teenager, in his final year of junior high school at the time of the offense and, by the time of his arrest, a 15-⁠year-old high school student, breaks into the streaming service Bandai Channel, cancels 46,812 subscriptions on November 4, 2025 and forces the operator to suspend the service temporarily. According to police, he used the AI chatbot ChatGPT to create the malicious program behind the cancellations.
Caveat: Police statements and confession, no verdict.
#

Suspected Claude agent breaks in through web apps and steals a production database#

directed‑autonomous
On an attacker system, Northwave’s CERT finds a forged pentest authorization letter, a .claude/pentests/ directory and reports that appear to come from Claude and document which steps the agent carried out itself. The agent maps the external attack surface, uses parallel entry points through exposed web applications, plants AI-⁠generated webshells and exfiltrates a production database; more than 50 environment-specific scripts appear within hours, and Northwave puts the AI share at 95 percent.
Caveat: Victim not named; the model attribution rests on artifacts, not vendor telemetry.
#

Telegram-directed OpenClaw agent phishes US tax professionals (Neo)#

directed‑autonomous · Attack date May 2026
According to the threat intelligence blog PhantomCandle, an attacker known as B made only the strategic calls over Telegram, such as target group, lure theme and timing, while Neo, an instance of OpenClaw (an open-source agent that works through tasks on its own), did the technical work. Neo’s working files, left exposed on a misconfigured server, show that the agent wrote beacons, compiled four remote access trojan families, evaded Norton and sent about 24,000 phishing emails to US accountants and tax preparers. The C2 logs show a beacon running on at least one computer in South Africa, through which the agent pulled 3,682 browser cookies.
Caveat: PhantomCandle and the Chinese security platform NOSEC both rely on the attacker’s files; neither cites confirmation from anyone affected. According to NOSEC, B set up the mail servers, domains and lures, and the two South African computers in Neo’s logs were B’s test machines; whether the victim machine PhantomCandle names is one of them remains open. NOSEC counts 18,567 emails rather than about 24,000; those posing as business inquiries carried no attachment or link.
#

Group hits agencies and the power sector with likely LLM-⁠written loaders (Armored Likho)#

augmented
Kaspersky describes Armored Likho, also known as Eagle Werewolf, as a previously unknown group that blends financially motivated campaigns against private individuals with targeted espionage against government agencies and the electric power sector. Confirmed victims are in Russia, Kazakhstan and Brazil. The first-stage loaders carry verbose comments and bullet-point emojis, which Kaspersky reads as a strong sign of LLM-⁠generated code.
Caveat: In its July report Kaspersky leaves open whether the core payload BusySnake was also built with LLM help; in its August follow-up it considers LLM help possible for tools used in later attack stages as well. Neither report names individual victim organizations; the July report gives only countries and sectors.
#

Phishing email delivers a likely AI-⁠built ransomware framework (Avalon, CrownX)#

augmented
Blackpoint analyzes the previously unknown malware framework Avalon, which can harvest credentials, move laterally, delete restore points and forensic traces and encrypt files with its ransomware component CrownX, and sees strong indicators of AI-⁠assisted development. It was delivered by a phishing email posing as a legal document notification, via a password-protected archive on Proton Drive and an LNK shortcut inside an ISO image that loaded the payload only in memory. Blackpoint recovered the payload from a compromised endpoint and has since observed further activity across its partner base.
Caveat: Blackpoint infers AI assistance only from how the framework was built, assembled rapidly from functional components with little regard for tradecraft or operational security, and names neither a model nor specific evidence. The report names no affected organization and does not say whether CrownX actually encrypted any files.
#

AI agent runs an extortion operation from break-in to encryption (ENCFORGE, JadePuffer)#

Key casedirected‑autonomous
Sysdig calls JadePuffer the first documented case of agentic ransomware: a language model exploits an exposed Langflow instance and in the end encrypts 1,342 configuration entries in MySQL on its own. Using root access, the agent wrote a backdoor account into the database behind Nacos (Alibaba’s open-source configuration and service registry), but its password hash had apparently come out empty; 31 seconds after the failed login, it deleted the account and recreated it with a working hash. The agent lost the encryption key, and the payment address is the example from the Bitcoin documentation. Later the same actor deploys ENCFORGE, a Go ransomware aimed at model checkpoints, vector databases and other AI infrastructure. Microsoft tracks the actor as Storm-⁠3168 and also ties it to a June 2026 attack in which a compromised service principal tried to delete more than 100 of one organization’s Azure storage accounts in about seven minutes, mostly successfully.
Caveat: Where the MySQL credentials came from is unknown according to Sysdig. Sysdig itself dates the first post inconsistently to July 1 and July 3. Sysdig gives no date for the ENCFORGE deployment; the post speaks only of the tool maturing in a matter of days. Microsoft calls the attacks agentic-driven in its title but for the Azure attack shows only automated or scripted execution; it saw no ransom note.
#

Researcher uses Claude to take over a Front Gate Tickets admin account#

augmented to directed‑autonomous · Attack date April 2026
In April, security researcher Ian Carroll found a SQL injection in an API for the entry scanners of Front Gate Tickets, a Live Nation subsidiary that handles ticketing for nearly every major US music festival. He had Claude Code running Opus 4.7 examine the API; by his account, the model worked out that the web application firewall in front of it does not inspect nested subqueries and wrote the entire exploit chain itself. With it, Carroll read a few records from some of the more than 500 tables of customer and staff data and used a password reset code pulled the same way to take over a super administrator account that could issue free tickets for every festival on the platform.
Caveat: Carroll is part of Anthropic’s Cyber Verification Program, which unlocks certain Claude hacking capabilities for approved researchers; by his account he issued no tickets. Front Gate calls him a responsible security researcher. The company fixed the flaw the day after his April 25 report, says it detected the access before his report, which Carroll doubts, and has found no evidence of exploitation or exposed customer data.
#

Attackers hijack Ollama and LiteLLM honeypots to power offensive tools (Strix)#

directed‑autonomous · Attack date March 2026
Between March and May 2026, Zenity runs exposed endpoints of Ollama (software that serves language models on one’s own hardware) and LiteLLM (a gateway for LLM API requests) as a honeypot and catches three operators hijacking them as the model backend for offensive tools. One aims the autonomous pentest agent Strix, primed with a 140,000-character system prompt, at a well-established French auction site; repeated retry commands suggest, according to Zenity, a live operator steering the attack, but Zenity’s sensors detect and block the attempt before it reaches the real target.
Caveat: A honeypot was hit, not a real victim; the entry is listed as a honeypot case for that reason. The tool, system prompt and target are documented, not the course inside the target network; the role follows from how Strix is built.
#

Attacker takes over an AWS environment in 72 hours with likely AI-⁠assisted tooling#

augmented to directed‑autonomous
A financially motivated attacker compromises a large AWS environment in about 72 hours, chains weaknesses across application services, source control, CI/CD, the running workloads on ECS and EC2, and the data stores, and demonstrates control through reversible disruptions such as locked S3 buckets and ECS services scaled to zero. Sygnia found several artifacts pointing to AI-⁠assisted tooling and scripting. Because access keys from four accounts were used within the same second from the same IP address, Sygnia sees the execution as automated and potentially agent-driven.
Caveat: Sygnia states explicitly that the artifacts are not definitive proof of autonomous agents, only consistent with AI-⁠assisted or AI-⁠orchestrated operations. The report cites no logs and names no agent.
#

Intruders secure access with a likely AI-⁠written tunnel script (Bumblebee, Akira)#

augmented · Attack date July 2025
The DFIR Report describes two July 2025 intrusions in a campaign that spread trojanized installers for tools such as ManageEngine OpManager and Advanced IP Scanner through Bing search results: the attackers used the Bumblebee loader to fetch the AdaptixC2 framework, took over domain controllers and encrypted the networks with Akira ransomware. In the second intrusion, handled by Swisscom B2B CSIRT, the attacker kept access by installing the Cloudflared tunneling software as a Windows service on a domain controller. The PowerShell script that did this was likely developed with generative AI tools, according to The DFIR Report.
Caveat: The DFIR Report bases the AI attribution only on the comments and console output of this one helper script, rates it as likely and names no model; it does not concern Bumblebee, AdaptixC2 or the ransomware. The victims remain anonymous. The DFIR Report’s own August 2025 flash alert on the same intrusions does not mention AI.
#

Likely LLM-⁠written loader diverts online store payments (Cartwright)#

augmented to directed‑autonomous · Attack date 2026⁠-⁠04⁠-⁠07
IT consultant Maurizio Fonte describes an Italian online store where, from April 7, 2026, at the latest, an injected loader script hid the real payment options at checkout and steered customers through a fake payment window into SEPA transfers to the attackers. Fonte considers the loader provably written by a language model, partly because the runtime library behind it states in the comment at the top of the file that an LLM generates the JavaScript. According to Fonte, the attackers got in through SQL injection that exposed the administrators’ password hashes; he finds the sequence from profiling the store to a loader tailored to its real checkout entirely consistent with a language model orchestrating it.
Caveat: Fonte rates this orchestration only at medium confidence and explicitly does not claim that a model sent the attack requests, since the individual payloads were typical of common automated SQL injection tools such as sqlmap. All details come from Fonte, who does not name the store and works as an AI and security consultant himself; the attribution summary in his repository gives the AI origin of the code only medium to high confidence.
#

AI agent works its way through a company network in under six hours#

directed‑autonomous
Tencent’s Yunding cloud security lab describes an attack of nearly six hours that it attributes to an AI agent; it ran through a company’s systems, including its source code platform, single sign-on, Nacos (Alibaba’s open-source configuration and service registry), mail system and databases. Where a tool was missing, the agent wrote its own Java clients on the victim systems and pulled the database drivers out of the company’s application packages; through xp_cmdshell (a function through which a Microsoft SQL Server runs system commands) it ran commands on a Windows machine. The victim machines’ shell history kept the commands along with comments in which the agent recorded its reasoning, such as a plan to write a route without the authentication filter straight into the gateway configuration in the Nacos database.
Caveat: Tencent names neither the victim nor the date and does not say how it obtained the command logs. The report infers AI involvement from features of the commands, above all the explanatory comments and the programs rewritten again and again. It names tools only for all cases in the report together, among them Claude Code and OpenClaw (an open-source agent that works through tasks on its own), and ties none of them to this attack.
#

AI agent breaks into Odoo servers with an exploit it keeps rewriting#

directed‑autonomous
In an attack on servers running Odoo (business software for accounting and inventory), an AI agent rewrote its exploit after every failure, according to Tencent’s Yunding cloud security lab, as more than ten versions from odoo_rce_v5.py to odoo_final.py show; in the end it ran commands as root, injected SSH keys, established persistence and extracted credentials. Once code execution was confirmed, the agent attacked the remaining targets in parallel and picked one of five privilege escalation paths for each machine, among them a tampered control script for JasperReports (business reporting software) that runs as root on the next restart, adds the attacker’s key and leaves behind a setuid root shell.
Caveat: Tencent names neither the victims nor the date or number of targets and does not say where the file names and scripts came from. The report infers AI involvement from the attacker’s behavior, above all the versions rewritten again and again. It names tools only for all cases in the report together, among them Claude Code and OpenClaw (an open-source agent that works through tasks on its own), and ties none of them to this attack.
#

AI agent exploits Tautulli to pull cloud credentials from several servers#

directed‑autonomous
Tencent’s Yunding cloud security lab shows how an AI agent used an exploit against Tautulli (a monitoring tool for Plex media servers) to run commands on several machines and fetch a second stage. It then used a path traversal flaw on each of those machines to pull SSH keys and credentials for AWS, Google Cloud, Azure and Kubernetes, among others, storing them in one folder per IP address. According to Tencent, the agent used no ready-made tool or large wordlist; the paths it queried look like a selection it put together from its own knowledge.
Caveat: Tencent names neither the victims nor the date or number of machines and does not say where it got the traces it describes; whether the case belongs to another attack in the report is left open. The report bases the AI attribution mainly on the choice of paths. It names tools only for all cases in the report together, among them Claude Code and OpenClaw (an open-source agent that works through tasks on its own), and ties none of them to this attack.
#

Blind Eagle sends SVG lures with a likely AI-⁠written script (APT-⁠C-⁠36)#

augmented · Attack date April 2026
Chinese security company 360 observed a new phishing wave against users in Colombia in April 2026, which it attributes to the Blind Eagle group (APT-⁠C-⁠36). SVG files sent by email carried an encrypted JavaScript downloader that an embedded script decrypted and dropped; the downloader used PowerShell to fetch HijackLoader and finally the Remcos remote access trojan. According to 360, the group’s code shows clear traces of AI generation; as evidence the report shows the comments in the embedded script.
Caveat: 360 bases the AI assessment on the comments alone and names no model. The attribution to Blind Eagle rests on similarities with earlier campaigns, such as the use of the same HijackLoader modules. The report names no compromised victims.
#

Likely LLM-⁠built AitM platform mirrors hospitality booking engines (Kitana)#

augmented
Kitana is a modular adversary-in-the-middle platform of a Node.js proxy and a Python backend that mirrors, in real time, hospitality booking engines in the US and Canada and retailer sites in Chile and Saudi Arabia; a human at the Telegram panel captures passwords and card data and triggers fake second-factor prompts. NCC Group assesses documentation, configuration and code structure as LLM-⁠generated and at the same time found hard-coded credentials in the source.
Caveat: The linked press release devotes one sentence to Kitana; the details are in NCC Group’s full threat intelligence report.
#

Russian attacker uses Claude against hospitality booking platforms (HexStrike)#

directed‑autonomous · Attack date March 2026
On April 16, 2026, Cybernews finds a Russian attacker’s server open on the internet with source code, exfiltrated data and at least 50 machine-generated assessment reports on hospitality companies, each structured like a professional pentest report. The attacker couples the open-source HexStrike AI (it bundles attack tools for AI agents) with Claude and declares every job an authorized penetration test; named victims are NebulaPMS from South Africa with about two million records, RoomScope from Thailand with about 6.4 million booking records, IGMS from Canada and Staysee from Japan, 2.1 million distinct email addresses in all.
Caveat: The attacker took the server offline during the investigation, so the victim list is incomplete; Cybernews notes that a company can appear in the reports without the attack having succeeded. NebulaPMS operator Hospitality Technology International confirmed an incident to MyBroadband, dated it to March 2026 and reported it to the South African data protection authority; the other companies named had not commented by the time of publication.
#

Heavily AI-⁠assisted attack on a Babel editor fails (SKELYAAGENT, UAC-⁠0272)#

augmented · Attack date 2026⁠-⁠06⁠-⁠18
On June 18, 2026, an editor at the online outlet Babel received a link to an archive with two Office documents whose macros were meant to launch custom-built malware; according to Babel, the attempt failed. SKELYAAGENT, as CERT-UA calls the malware, opens covert remote access, including through Cloudflare tunnels, logs keystrokes, records from the microphone and webcam, and grabs credentials from browsers and messaging apps. CERT-UA lists heavy use of artificial intelligence among the hallmarks of the attacks, which it tracks as UAC-⁠0272 and which may have been running since late May 2026.
Caveat: CERT-UA does not say what the attackers used AI for. Its analysis is public only as reproduced by Babel, the outlet that was itself targeted.
#

Operator compromises over 25,000 websites with likely AI-⁠built exploits (WP-⁠SHELLSTORM)#

augmented · Attack date June 2026
Ctrl-Alt-Intel analyzes an exposed working directory belonging to an operator who mass-exploited known flaws in WordPress plugins and other web applications in June 2026 and planted web shells; 25,195 websites carried confirmed or validated evidence of compromise. His scripts and shell commands contain comments in fluent Simplified Chinese. According to Ctrl-Alt-Intel, evidence suggests he relied heavily on AI to develop his exploit scripts.
Caveat: Ctrl-Alt-Intel bases its cautiously worded AI assessment on a screenshot of the top of the most recent exploit script, without spelling out the telltale features, and names no model. SOCRadar, which described the same server under the name WP-⁠SHELLSTORM on July 9, does not mention AI.
#

Applicant allegedly withdrew three rivals’ RPSC applications with AI-⁠written code#

augmented · Attack date 2025⁠-⁠12⁠-⁠29
According to police, a 27-⁠year-old mining engineer used AI tools to write code that bypasses the one-⁠time registration check of the application portal of the Rajasthan Public Service Commission (the body that recruits for public service posts in the Indian state of Rajasthan) and withdrew the applications of three rivals ahead of him on the waitlist. It came to light because the portal had no withdrawal window open at all and one of those affected reported the automatic text message; the cyber police in Ajmer arrested the engineer in June 2026.
Caveat: In every report the AI use rests on what the investigators state, not on independent verification. The reports differ on which mechanism was bypassed: the Navbharat Times names the one-⁠time-password check rather than one-⁠time registration. Only the Indian Express names tools, listing ChatGPT, Grok and DeepSeek.
#

Operator with access to 409 FortiGate firewalls uses Cursor and AI agents (FortiBleed)#

augmented to directed‑autonomous
SOCRadar gains access to the working environment of an affiliate of the INC and Lynx extortion brands: confirmed admin access to 409 FortiGate firewalls, with a path to domain admin in 354 cases, and at least twelve ransomware deployments. According to SpyCloud, the operators wrote the Telegram bot for cracking passwords and the scripts for their victims’ Active Directory with Cursor (a programming environment with a built-in AI assistant). They ran AI agents built on CyberStrike through an account at the model broker OpenRouter that spent about 4,554 dollars; according to SOCRadar, artifacts indicate that they used the agents to check Fortinet, Windows and VMware targets, among others, for known flaws, partly with active testing, and on their own servers had agents hunt for unknown vulnerabilities in Nextcloud.
Caveat: SpyCloud bases the Cursor finding on a session token and on style traits that prove nothing alone. Arctic Wolf found no independent proof of AI decision-making in the tooling. For the known-flaw checks, SOCRadar shows tasking, prompts and a session excerpt, some of them mere checklists, but no confirmed exploitation; the Nextcloud hunt found neither exploit nor zero-day. SOCRadar calls the group an affiliate only in its whitepaper, having told Dark Reading it was a separate access broker.
#

Operator hijacks a third-party Ollama server for an attack tool in development#

directed‑autonomous · Attack date 2026⁠-⁠06⁠-⁠12
From June 12 to 14, 2026, an operator whose sessions come from residential IP addresses in Hyderabad uses a misconfigured third-party Ollama server (Ollama serves language models on one’s own hardware) as the free reasoning engine of a multi-stage attack tool still under construction, meant to scan targets, match vulnerabilities and write proof-of-concept exploits; the model makes the decisions at every step. Sysdig observed the tool being built and expanded throughout the session, but it was only ever run against private, self-hosted test targets and a HackTheBox practice range.
Caveat: The only real damage is the theft of compute from the unnamed owner of the Ollama server. The attribution of the sessions to one operator rests on identical tooling signatures and target profiles.
#

Pix fraud trojan in Brazil with a control panel likely built with AI (SmartRAT)#

augmented · Attack date March 2026
In March 2026 Zscaler ThreatLabz observed a ClickFix campaign that poses as a Brazilian bank and gets victims to run a PowerShell command themselves, which pulls down the remote access trojan SmartRAT; the trojan overlays fake password forms, logs keystrokes and replaces QR codes for Pix (Brazil’s instant payment system) with the attackers’ own. According to Zscaler, the trojan’s web-⁠based control panel, like the lure page, was likely built with AI tools, as verbose explanatory comments and frequent emoticons in its source suggest. Trend Micro had described the same malware family in May 2026 as Banana RAT, with a different delivery path, and found it on compromised machines.
Caveat: Zscaler infers the AI involvement solely from features in the source of the panel and the lure page and names no model; the report does not attribute an AI origin to the trojan itself. Zscaler names no victims. Compromised machines are documented only by Trend Micro, whose report does not mention AI and describes a campaign with a different delivery path and different servers; whether the same control panel was used there remains open.
#

Low-⁠skilled actor compromises 14 companies with a stolen Claude instance and Codex#

directed‑autonomous
OALABS documents an actor with apparently limited expertise who compromises at least 14 companies with a stolen Claude instance, Codex (OpenAI’s coding agent) and prompts such as recon this. Across more than 1,000 sessions his requests triggered just one policy violation on Codex and nine on Claude. OALABS attributes this mainly to the actor framing every request as part of an authorized red-⁠team engagement and sees older model versions as a possible contributing factor.
Caveat: The logs come from the attacker’s working directory, which an unnamed friend of OALABS was able to download. The 14 companies remain anonymous and have confirmed nothing; the count rests on those logs and on the tools and artifacts the AI built for the attacker.
#

Extortion group says it used AI to analyze loot from Novo Nordisk and Avnet (FulcrumSec)#

augmented · Attack date March 2026
FulcrumSec steals, publishes and extorts without encrypting, using cheap entry points such as exposed credentials in client-side JavaScript; according to Ingeniøren, it moved undisturbed through Novo Nordisk’s internal systems for at least 47 days. Novo Nordisk confirmed the access on June 11, 2026 and refused a 25 million dollar demand; the group claims 1.3 terabytes and 700,717 files and says it had a team of AI agents analyze 32 of the company’s stolen AI models and other models review the findings. At Avnet, by its own account, it generated the analysis report with the victim’s stolen OpenAI key; GuidePoint independently describes a similar pattern at a different victim, without confirming the Avnet case itself.
Caveat: The volume figures come from the group, not from independent verification; Novo Nordisk never confirmed them but acknowledges that non-⁠public data was copied. The AI role rests partly on the attackers’ own account. Ingeniøren bases the 47 days on data the group itself handed over and on correspondence with it; the article is paywalled, and only its lead is freely readable.
#

Operators get language models to write exploits under a CTF pretext and deploy them#

augmented · Attack date June 2026
Sysdig observed several independent operators exploiting known flaws in AI platforms such as PraisonAI and FastGPT and in the document converter Gotenberg; in early June one address hit five applications within 18 hours, created user accounts and tried to use an AWS key harvested along the way for Amazon Bedrock (the AWS service for accessing language models). User agents, passwords, AWS session names and key aliases all carried labels such as ctf-⁠litellm-cve42271, which Sysdig says hardly any human would write into every field. Sysdig concludes that the operators got their language models to write the exploits by posing CTF challenges and deployed the code nearly verbatim.
Caveat: Sysdig did not see the prompts and infers AI involvement from the labels; it best explains two operators sharing one user agent by separate prompting but allows for coordination or a shared tool. The post leaves open whether the instances hit belonged to real operators. If they were sensors: a honeypot was hit, not a real victim, and the entry then stands as a honeypot case in the list.
#

npm worms likely developed with help from Claude Code (Mini Shai-Hulud, TeamPCP)#

augmented
The Chinese security company Antiy analyzes the TeamPCP group: the npm worms Chalk/Debug, Shai-Hulud, Megalodon and Mini Shai-Hulud were developed with AI assistance, in Antiy’s assessment; for Mini Shai-Hulud, Antiy names Claude 3.5 Sonnet and Claude Code, supplemented by GPT-⁠4o and Copilot. The Claude attribution rests on repository labels and the commit address under the GitHub user name claude. According to Antiy, the development cycle shrank to weeks and then days within eight months.
Caveat: Antiy recovered no prompts; the commit address is Claude’s default, not exclusive to this actor. Dataminr reads the Claude references the other way around: as a means for the worms to blend into AI tools and their code review, not as evidence of how the worms were built. The report names no individual victim.
#

Phishing platform for rent has Claude Sonnet comb hijacked mailboxes (Kali365)#

augmented · Attack date April 2026
Kali365, also known as Octopi365 and Freedom365, is a phishing platform for rent that abuses Microsoft’s device-code login (a login method in which a code is confirmed on a second device) to keep access to Microsoft 365 accounts even after multi-factor authentication is enabled and passwords are changed. The AI part comes in after the break-in: a business email compromise module has Claude Sonnet assess the intercepted mail threads, pick out lucrative payment flows and draft replies with swapped bank details; on May 20, 2026 alone, Huntress counted more than 80 successful logins from Tencent Cloud addresses.
Caveat: Huntress states that it used AI assistance for parts of the analysis and the post itself; the first observation in April 2026 is attributed to the FBI.
#

Likely AI-⁠written Python stealer lures users hunting for lost crypto wallets#

augmented · Attack date January 2026
In early January 2026, HP Wolf Security stopped an attack on a user who had downloaded a Python script named Crypto Wallet Finder App.py from a popular file-sharing service, supposedly a tool for recovering lost cryptocurrency wallets. In reality the script steals documents, wallet files and passwords saved in the browser and sends the haul as a ZIP archive to the attacker through a Discord webhook. HP says the code structure, naming patterns and heavy use of emojis are consistent with code written or heavily modified with AI assistance, likely through vibe coding.
Caveat: HP infers AI assistance solely from structure, naming and emojis and names no model. The report describes only this one anonymous user and no other recipients of the script.
#

Pro-⁠Ukrainian hacktivists use AI-⁠written scripts in attacks outside Russia (4BID)#

augmented
Kaspersky describes attacks by the pro-⁠Ukrainian hacktivist group 4BID and affiliated groups that, according to the report, for the first time hit government, healthcare and aviation organizations in Kazakhstan, the United Arab Emirates, Syria and Egypt in addition to targets in Russia and Belarus, mostly through the ProxyShell flaw in Exchange. The compromised hosts held custom scripts that fetch tools such as AnyDesk; Kaspersky considers some of them recognizably AI-⁠generated because individual systems held several versions side by side, some of which did not work. According to Kaspersky, the BAT installer of the BlackSalt backdoor was obviously written with AI tools.
Caveat: Kaspersky considers only some of the scripts AI-⁠generated, gives no reason in the case of the BlackSalt installer and names no model. It considers the findings at the starting point of its investigation likely but not certain to be the hacktivists’ work, and because several groups were active on the same hosts, the server the AnyDesk script reports to could belong to any of them. The report identifies victims only by country and sector.
#

AI agent breaks in through marimo and escapes the container to the host#

directed‑autonomous · Attack date 2026⁠-⁠05⁠-⁠29
An AI agent breaks in through the flaw CVE-⁠2026-⁠39987 in marimo (notebook software for Python), enumerates the Docker socket, escapes to the host via a privileged container and nsenter (a Linux command that enters another process’s namespaces) and replays a Kubernetes service account token to read the entire secret store. Sysdig calls it the first observed case in which an agent harness (the program scaffolding that equips a model with tools and a work loop) rather than a human performs the container escape.
Caveat: Sysdig names no customer organization as the victim. Sysdig ran its own honeypot instances for the same marimo flaw in spring 2026 to observe attacks; the post leaves open whether this case hit one of them or a real system. If it was a honeypot: a honeypot was hit, not a real victim, and the entry then stands as a honeypot case in the list.
#

Likely LLM-⁠built stealer targets UK organizations (SilentRunLoader, TA4922)#

augmented · Attack date March 2026
Starting March 30, 2026, Proofpoint observed two campaigns by the Chinese-speaking group TA4922 that used tax and benefits lures to deliver the Python loader and stealer SilentRunLoader to organizations in the United Kingdom and recipients in Southeast Asia; it fetches a further stage and sends stored credentials, cookies and browsing data from Google Chrome to an attacker server. Citing the comments, strings and unchanged hardcoded constants in the code, including an API key placeholder that appears to have been generated by an LLM, Proofpoint assesses with high confidence that the group is likely using LLMs to develop new Python malware.
Caveat: Proofpoint infers AI involvement solely from features of the code and names no model. The report gives no number of infected machines and names no individual victims.
#

Attackers run a multi-agent lab with Claude Opus 4.5 for EDR evasion#

augmented
Sophos comes across a multi-agent lab through an anomalous endpoint in a customer tenant: Claude Opus 4.5 as the coordinating agent in Cursor (a programming environment with a built-in AI assistant), subagents for EDR testing against Sophos, CrowdStrike and Defender, for opsec hardening and VM deployment, plus a Sliver C2 (an open-source C2 framework), about 80 modules for more than 70 evasion techniques. Sophos links the development activity to known ransomware and data theft operations; the agents document near-universal EDR evasion.
Caveat: Sophos stresses that humans drove the workflow and AI only accelerated development and testing.
#

Russia-linked group uses AI at every stage against Ukraine (LegionRelay, GREYVIBE)#

augmented · Attack date August 2025
GREYVIBE, a Russia-nexus group, has been attacking Ukrainian military, government, business and civilian targets since at least August 2025 in five named campaigns with systematic use of generative AI throughout, from lure pages through obfuscators to the development of the LegionRelay trojan. Design flaws in that trojan gave WithSecure months of insight into victims and the attackers’ actions.
Caveat: WithSecure assesses LegionRelay as likely developed with LLM assistance and places the group in a gray area between cybercrime and state affiliation.
#

Claude Code breaks into government bodies and universities in Asia (Hephaestus)#

Key casedirected‑autonomous
Claude Code is steered through a CLAUDE.md (an instruction file the agent reads at the start of each session) with an authorization preamble and a scope of domain suffixes for Indonesia, South Korea, Thailand and Bangladesh, automating reconnaissance, exploitation, persistence, lateral movement and reporting. Confirmed compromises include Indonesian and Bangladeshi government bodies, Indonesian and South Korean universities, among them a chain of three CVEs against Moodle (a learning platform used by schools and universities) up to root and more than 41,000 exposed accounts on an OJS journal platform; access is then sold via Telegram. The operation continued after the disclosure: in August the Chinese security vendor NOSEC found another workstation of the same actor, identifiable by the same report signature and the same file staging address as in the original Oasis Security report. In the session logs recovered there, by NOSEC’s reading, the operator only pastes credential lists, chases results of code execution and receives them, while six or more sessions run in parallel.
Caveat: The details come from reports the agent itself generated about its intrusions; Kaspersky GReAT described the case independently in August. The NOSEC report carries no byline and no date; its figures likewise come from the attacker’s own files, and none of the universities it names has commented, which is why they do not appear in this entry. Whether the attacks on Chinese targets mentioned in the same report took place is something NOSEC explicitly leaves open.
#

IoT botnet written with a language model (TuxBot v3)#

augmented · Attack date January 2026
According to Unit 42, a developer had a language model write C modules, ported exploits and the command server with a DDoS-for-hire panel for the IoT botnet TuxBot v3, and left the model’s raw chain-of-thought reasoning in the source code. Compiled bots have been appearing in the wild since January 2026; Unit 42 saw six new samples in April 2026, and a command server and a server delivering the bots were active. Telnet brute-forcing with nearly 1,500 default credentials works, but most of the exploits do not, largely because of bugs from the AI help.
Caveat: Unit 42 documents samples in the wild and active servers but neither the number nor the location of infected devices. What it analyzed is a development snapshot from a source code archive, and the first VirusTotal sample was a debug build without a real command server. Unit 42 assumes that deployed builds may already have fixed some or all of the bugs.
#

AI-⁠written npm package steals files (mouse5212-super-formatter)#

augmented · Attack date 2026⁠-⁠05⁠-⁠26
OX Security found an infostealer in the npm package mouse5212-super-formatter that, on install, uploads every file in the /mnt/user-data directory to a GitHub repository controlled by the attacker; according to Dependency Watch, that directory is where Claude keeps uploaded files and its own output. OX says the attacker had AI generate the malware without understanding basic operational security; his private GitHub token was hardcoded in the package, and the researchers used it to trace the exfiltrated files in his repository. By the time OX published, the package had 676 downloads.
Caveat: OX does not say what marks the code as AI-⁠generated. OX says most of the roughly seven exfiltrations it saw in the repository were probably the attacker’s own tests; the report documents no harmed third-party victim.
#

AI agent uses a longstanding Fedora account and gets patches into the Anaconda installer#

directed‑autonomous · Attack date April 2026
From April to late May 2026, an AI agent operating under the longstanding Bugzilla account of a Fedora member assigned dozens of bug reports to that account and closed several, including in components it did not own, with obviously LLM-⁠generated comments. Through two further GitHub accounts it submitted LLM-⁠generated fixes to Fedora, openSUSE and LXQt projects; two of them made it into version 45.5 of Fedora’s Anaconda installer on May 26 and were reverted in version 45.6 on June 2. The account holder stated that the credentials had been compromised.
Caveat: Fedora developer Adam Williamson saw three possible explanations: a taken-over account, an agent run by the account holder, or an attacker who still controlled the holder’s email address; he suspected that the email containing the holder’s statement was itself LLM-⁠generated. According to Williamson, nothing he had seen so far looked outright malicious. Which model or tool was used is not known.
#

AI agent gets from marimo to an internal PostgreSQL database in about an hour#

directed‑autonomous · Attack date 2026⁠-⁠05⁠-⁠10
The first intrusion carried out by an AI agent that the Sysdig threat research team captured: from a compromised instance of marimo (notebook software for Python) through stolen cloud credentials and an SSH key from AWS Secrets Manager to a full dump of an internal PostgreSQL database in about an hour. A Chinese-language planning comment in the command stream and a dump of a table that does not exist in the schema point to real-time composition rather than a script; Cloudflare Workers (Cloudflare’s service for running small programs at many locations) serve as an egress pool across eleven addresses.
Caveat: Sysdig names no customer organization as the victim. Sysdig ran its own honeypot instances for the same marimo flaw in spring 2026; the post leaves open whether this case hit one of them or a real system. If it was a honeypot: a honeypot was hit, not a real victim, and the entry then stands as a honeypot case in the list.
#

Iran-linked group refines a wiping script against Vyncs with ChatGPT (Ababil of Minab)#

augmented · Attack date March 2026
Gambit attributes the persona Ababil of Minab with high confidence to the Black Shadow cluster, which Israel’s cyber directorate links to Iran’s intelligence ministry; the campaign exfiltrates data from transit agencies and companies in the US, Israel, Saudi Arabia and Turkey, with destructive actions at a subset of the victims. The Los Angeles transit agency confirmed the breach on April 2, 2026; Hunt.io found database backups, SCADA configurations and rail yard data in the attackers’ open directory. As reported by BankInfoSecurity, Gambit says the group used ChatGPT to refine the script that enumerated and dropped databases in the environment of the vehicle tracking company Vyncs.
Caveat: The further AI claim, help with sorting out system databases before wiping 58 SQL servers, sits in the non-⁠public full text of Gambit’s report; which of the victims it refers to cannot be checked through the linked pages. Hunt.io has not independently verified the attribution; Gambit was not the incident responder.
#

Likely AI-⁠built platform spies on a Turkish insurer (ARPA, UTA-⁠2026-⁠013)#

augmented · Attack date March 2026
The Hunter’s Ledger describes ARPA Korelasyon Motoru, a platform an attacker used for at least 73 days to siphon internal infrastructure data from a state-affiliated Turkish insurer through stolen access to four monitoring systems, merging it into a view of 1,859 hosts. The attacker built it by repurposing OpenClaw (an open-source agent that works through tasks on its own), and according to the parent report its Python files each show at least nine of 13 traits the author associates with code co-⁠written by a language model. The server also held Turkish-language instructions for a Windows user inside the victim’s network to set up a reverse SSH tunnel to the attacker.
Caveat: The author infers the AI origin of the code from style traits alone. A query layer built on the Kimi language model was still in development, and whether the tunnel was actually set up cannot be confirmed from outside. The report does not name the victim.
#

Iranian group uses a likely AI-⁠written backdoor (MiniFast, Nimbus Manticore)#

augmented · Attack date February 2026
Nimbus Manticore, also UNC1549, attributed to the Revolutionary Guard, runs three waves between February and April 2026 with aviation and software-industry lures against targets in the US, Europe and the Middle East, without pausing during the military campaign against Iran. According to Check Point, the new MiniFast backdoor shows AI hallmarks: excessive error handling even around a simple user name lookup, verbose identifiers, embedded debug messages and a modularity at odds with the program’s simplicity.
Caveat: Check Point frames the AI origin as an assessment (likely) and does not disclose the forensic basis; only the information on the victims is solid.
#

Gemini CLI runs a botnet in a dental practice (Patriot Bait, bandcampro)#

directed‑autonomous · Attack date March 2026
From more than 200 session logs of Gemini CLI (Google’s command-line agent) between March 19 and April 21, 2026, Trend Micro reconstructs how a Russian-speaking lone actor migrates his C2 infrastructure in six minutes by prompt: the AI writes the server, sets up Cloudflare tunnels, bypasses the WAF and then manages the botnet of eight machines in a dental practice, OpenDental practice management database included. Over the whole period, according to Trend Micro, the actor wrote 11 percent of the text and the AI 89 percent. The first report in May already describes a script that asks Gemini 2.5 Flash for 20 plausible password variants for each WordPress account; according to the collected data, 29 administrator accounts were cracked, among them at weapons retailers, law offices and medical practices.
Caveat: The dental practice remains anonymous and has confirmed nothing, as do the owners of the WordPress sites. Trend Micro does not state explicitly that all 29 accounts were cracked with the Gemini script.
#

Composio reports a breach using LLM-⁠generated attack patterns, 5,001 GitHub tokens exposed#

augmented to directed‑autonomous
Composio, whose platform manages access tokens for GitHub, Gmail, Slack, Jira and other services on behalf of AI agents, reports that an attacker probed its systems extensively, brute-forcing many combinations of exploits from LLM-⁠generated attack patterns until gaining a foothold in an internal monitoring agent; from there the attacker moved through the automatic repair system to arbitrary code execution. According to Composio, the attacker was exceptionally fast and knew its internal architecture well, consistent with a highly skilled actor likely augmented by advanced AI systems. About 0.3 percent of active connections were affected, including 5,001 GitHub tokens; Composio adds that an auxiliary cache the attacker likely had access to held 5,241 API keys.
Caveat: The AI attribution is the victim’s own assessment without artifacts and names no agent or tool; as the entry point, Composio names only the probing with LLM-⁠generated attack patterns. According to Composio, the attacker also reached auxiliary systems through Gmail access tokens of certain employees and magic-link logins (login through a one-⁠time link sent by mail).
#

Attacker says AI found a bug in the Massa blockchain and sells the loot#

augmented · Attack date 2026⁠-⁠05⁠-⁠16
Starting on May 16, 2026, an attacker illegitimately minted MAS, the cryptocurrency of the Massa blockchain, through about 100 contracts of their own by exploiting an accounting bug in deferred calls that credited the same locked coins twice. On May 17 the attacker sold about 8.5 million MAS on the Bitget and MEXC exchanges for the dollar stablecoin USDT; the directly harmed party is Massa’s market maker, which absorbed the sales. According to Massa Labs, the attacker confirmed after being identified that they had independently rediscovered the bug using AI while a fix was already written and under review, and later returned the USDT.
Caveat: That AI found the bug rests solely on the attacker’s own statement to Massa Labs; the report does not say whether AI also wrote the exploit. Security firm CertiK had found and reported the same bug on May 7 in an AI-⁠assisted audit; the attacker says they filed their own bug bounty report with CertiK on May 9 and still exploited the flaw a week later.
#

Group raids agencies in Russia and Belarus with likely AI-⁠generated scripts (Leek Likho)#

augmented · Attack date February 2026
Kaspersky observed further targeted attacks by the group Leek Likho (also known as SkyCloak or Vortex Werewolf) on public sector organizations in Russia and Belarus from February to April 2026, in which an operator uses a covert Tor and SSH channel to bring in the tool rclone and exfiltrate files from USB drives. For each victim the group builds its own first stage with slightly altered file names, new readable variable names and some operations that change nothing. Kaspersky sees possible signs that a language model generates both the scripts and their names, and its conclusion states that Leek Likho uses AI to generate unique variants for each target.
Caveat: Kaspersky bases the AI origin solely on the differences between variants, names neither a model nor a prompt and presents it as merely possible in the analysis section. The report names no individual victims, only the sector and countries.
#

North Korean group deploys a Rust backdoor with AI traces (HelloDoor, Kimsuky)#

augmented
The North Korean group Kimsuky deploys HelloDoor, a backdoor in Rust, a language the group rarely uses according to Kaspersky. Kaspersky found emoji debug logs of the kind language models produce, alongside leftover typos such as decrytion failed that point to human post-editing. Victims of the PebbleDash cluster, to which Kaspersky assigns HelloDoor, include Brazilian and South Korean defense organizations and a defense company in Germany.
Caveat: The AI attribution rests on code artifacts, not recovered prompts; Kaspersky attributes the activity with medium-high confidence. The report names no individual victim organizations, only countries and sector.
#

Extortion group uses AI for its panel and negotiation texts (GLOCKER, The Gentlemen)#

augmented
The leak of the Gentlemen ransomware group’s internal Rocket.Chat server, which the group acknowledged on May 4, 2026, shows what it uses AI for: according to Check Point, the administrator zeta88 writes that he built the GLOCKER admin panel in three days with AI-⁠assisted coding, and according to Ransom-ISAC he names GPT and Claude as standard tools for writing negotiation texts to victims. As early as March 2026, Group-IB had reported that the group was using ChatGPT, Gemini and Claude, among other things to develop its ransomware. Ransom-ISAC identifies 66 victim organizations in the chats from November 2025 to late April 2026; Check Point says zeta88 personally encrypted at least one victim’s environment, and in one case the group received $190,000.
Caveat: None of the reports ties the AI use to any single victim. Group-IB does not say which part of the ransomware an AI wrote and backs its claim only with two screenshots of ChatGPT and Gemini unrelated to the ransomware; Ransom-ISAC found no AI-⁠generated malware in the chats. Check Point had only part of the leak, about 44 MB of a claimed 16 GB.
#

AI agent attacks Brazilian financial institutions (SHADOW-AETHER-⁠064)#

directed‑autonomous · Attack date April 2026
A Portuguese-speaking group has been running agentic attacks on Brazilian financial institutions since April 2026; the agent operates through ProxyChains (a tool for routing through proxies) and SSH in the victim network, uses the tunneling tool Chisel plus Impacket and CrackMapExec (toolkits for attacks on Windows network protocols) and generates its scripts dynamically. The same Trend Micro report describes the sister cluster SHADOW-AETHER-⁠040; Trend Micro found its six compromises of Mexican government entities through an exposed command server.
Caveat: Trend Micro documents the operator’s supervision, directing and correcting the agent, explicitly for the sister cluster SHADOW-AETHER-⁠040; for SHADOW-AETHER-⁠064 the report lists only the tasks handed to the agent. The Mexico findings likewise concern SHADOW-AETHER-⁠040; they come from the conversation logs on the command server and were later confirmed by a press report describing the same group.
#

Suspected Chinese actor turns AI agents on a Japanese technology firm#

directed‑autonomous
Google’s Threat Intelligence Group (GTIG) analyzed a suspected PRC-⁠nexus actor deploying agentic tools like Hexstrike (open source, bundles offensive tooling for AI agents) and Strix against a Japanese technology firm and a prominent East Asian cybersecurity platform. Hexstrike runs alongside the Graphiti memory system, a temporal knowledge graph that maintains a persistent state of the attack surface, so the agent decides for itself when to pivot between tools such as subfinder and httpx (which discover subdomains and probe web servers); in parallel the multi-agent penetration testing framework Strix automates identifying and validating vulnerabilities.
Caveat: GTIG gives neither a timeframe nor an outcome; what the report documents is the use of the tools against the two targets, not a compromise.
#

Malware against Ukraine with AI-⁠written camouflage (CANFAIL, LONGSTREAM)#

augmented
Google’s Threat Intelligence Group (GTIG) confirms that Russia-nexus attackers use the malware families CANFAIL and LONGSTREAM against Ukrainian organizations; both contain decoy code generated by a language model. In CANFAIL, comments left by the model explicitly mark certain code blocks as unused; GTIG believes the attackers likely asked the model for this padding to hide the malicious functionality. In the LONGSTREAM downloader, GTIG found 32 places that query whether daylight saving time is in effect, likely also generated code meant to look benign.
Caveat: GTIG infers a language model only from the comments and filler code, for LONGSTREAM explicitly only as likely, names neither the model nor individual victims, and documents no successful intrusion.
#

Vishing panel from the ShinyHunters orbit, one variant reworked with an LLM (Doko’s Panel)#

augmented
Push Security gained access to Doko’s Panel and variants of it, which operators in the ShinyHunters and BlackFile orbit use to steer victims by phone to cloned sign-in pages for Okta, Microsoft, Google or crypto exchanges and to relay the password and one-⁠time code by hand to the real service; submissions from real victims in the same week showed attacks in progress. A variant on the Okta phishing site Push first detected shows, by Push’s account, clear signs of having been reworked with a language model, such as verbose header comments titled NOTES FOR NEXT SESSION and duplicated server requests, which Push says is consistent with an operator pasting requirements into an LLM and accepting the output without understanding the existing code.
Caveat: Push infers the use of a language model from features of the code and names no model. The report does not say how many victims the submissions cover and does not tie the confirmed breaches attributed to these groups to the reworked variant. Push bases the link to ShinyHunters and BlackFile on overlaps with reporting by Mandiant and others.
#

North Korean group builds malicious npm packages with AI (PromptMink, Famous Chollima)#

augmented · Attack date October 2025
Famous Chollima from North Korea has been publishing npm packages that ReversingLabs has tracked since October 2025; their sheer number and self-promoting README text, in ReversingLabs’ assessment, suggest the real targets might be AI coding agents looking for a fitting dependency. A harmless-looking decoy package pulls in the payload, which scans directories for .env and .json files and for files with crypto-related names, exfiltrates source trees and plants SSH keys. On February 28, 2026, a commit co-⁠authored by Claude Opus added the decoy dependency to a crypto trading agent; according to ReversingLabs, the packages themselves were built with generative AI, betrayed by a leftover question from the model asking whether it should also obfuscate the README a bit.
Caveat: That the packages mainly target AI coding agents is ReversingLabs’ assessment; Claude Opus added the dependency on the victim’s behalf and was thus itself the target of the deception. The attribution to Famous Chollima rests on infrastructure patterns and overlaps with an earlier campaign.
#

North Korean group uses ChatGPT and Cursor to target Web3 developers (HexagonalRodent)#

augmented · Attack date January 2026
A North Korean group, tracked by Expel as HexagonalRodent, lures Web3 developers with fake job offers and coding tests that launch a backdoor when opened in Visual Studio Code. From its own telemetry, Expel documents the use of ChatGPT and Cursor (a programming environment with a built-in AI assistant), found accidentally leaked prompts for two new tools, and documents the building of at least one front-company website with the AI web designer Anima; the attackers’ database holds 26,584 wallets from 2,726 infected developer machines, and Expel found evidence that the attackers likely also had Western models check how conspicuous their own backdoors are.
Caveat: Expel attributes the group to Famous Chollima with medium-high confidence and considers the actual losses impossible to determine.
#

Operator runs a mass-exploitation scanner with Claude Code and OpenClaw (Bissa Scanner)#

augmented to directed‑autonomous
An open server exposes a mass-exploitation operation in which Claude Code and OpenClaw (an open-source agent that works through tasks on its own) help the operator run, orchestrate, troubleshoot and extend the collection pipeline; the OpenClaw logs show an AI control surface on the same server, set to Claude Sonnet and linked to a Telegram bot. The operator scanned millions of targets for React2Shell, compromised more than 900 companies and harvested more than 30,000 distinct .env files. The operator triages the access and digs deeper only for targets in the financial, cryptocurrency and retail sectors.
Caveat: The figure of more than 900 compromised companies comes from a file kept by the operator on the server, not from independent confirmation of each individual victim; for two of the three victims examined in detail, the initial access path remained unclear. The DFIR Report does not attribute any single step against a victim to Claude Code or OpenClaw; the exploitation itself ran through an automated pipeline.
#

Tampered NFC payment app with likely AI-⁠written code steals PINs in Brazil (NGate)#

augmented · Attack date November 2025
Since around November 2025, attackers have been targeting Android users in Brazil with a tampered version of the legitimate app HandyPay, spread through a fake lottery website and a spoofed Google Play page; the app relays the payment card’s NFC data to a device under their control and sends the PIN to their command-and-control server. On that server, ESET found logs from four compromised devices in Brazil with captured PINs, IP addresses and timestamps. According to ESET, the attackers most probably used generative AI to write the injected code that exfiltrates the PIN, as indicated by emoji in its log output that are typical of AI-⁠written text.
Caveat: ESET bases the AI involvement solely on the emoji in the log output and says itself that definitive proof remains elusive. The report documents no withdrawals or losses, and the victims remain anonymous.
#

Intrusion attempt via Obsidian with an AI-⁠generated RAT (PHANTOMPULSE)#

augmented
Elastic Security Labs investigated an intrusion attempt in the REF6598 campaign, which approaches individuals in the financial and cryptocurrency sectors as a supposed venture capital firm over LinkedIn and Telegram and gives them access to a vault in the note-taking app Obsidian; once the victim enables plugin sync, trojanized plugins silently execute code. The chain culminates in the previously undocumented RAT PHANTOMPULSE, which Elastic calls heavily AI-⁠generated, visible in abnormally verbose, step-numbered debug strings. In the observed intrusion, Elastic’s endpoint protection detected and blocked the chain at an early stage, before PHANTOMPULSE could execute.
Caveat: Elastic describes a single investigated intrusion attempt against an unnamed individual, without a date. Elastic infers the AI origin from stylistic features of the debug strings; the first report names no actor, and the follow-up report of May 2026 sees overlaps with North Korean groups.
#

Attackers turn TP-⁠Link routers into proxies with a likely AI-⁠written script (ShadowLink)#

augmented
In April 2026, Ctrl-Alt-Intel recovered evidence that attackers had taken over TP-⁠Link consumer routers through the CVE-⁠2024-⁠21833 flaw and enrolled them in a residential proxy network; the devices also ran the ShadowLink C2 beacon. The same beacon sat in Xygeni’s GitHub Action, tampered with on March 3, 2026, in a supply chain attack that Ctrl-Alt-Intel confidently attributes to the same actor. The router stager script resembles a TeamPCP script in structure, which Ctrl-Alt-Intel believes likely reflects AI-⁠assisted development by both actors rather than a shared developer.
Caveat: Ctrl-Alt-Intel mentions AI help only in passing while comparing two scripts, bases it on common coding patterns and names no model. The report does not say how many routers were taken over and leaves open whether the actor belongs to TeamPCP.
#

Paidy phishing spreads spyware from a likely LLM-⁠written framework (Canis C2)#

augmented · Attack date March 2026
A Japanese-language phishing page posing as the payment service Paidy would only show a supposed electricity bill after the visitor installed an Android app called Device Shield. The app abuses accessibility services to log input, records the screen and checks in with a command server. Through that server’s unprotected API, Hunt.io found the source code of the Canis C2 framework, with implants for Android, iOS, Windows, Linux and macOS. Hunt.io says large parts of the codebase show signs of LLM-⁠assisted development and a significant portion was likely written by a language model.
Caveat: Hunt.io bases the AI assessment only on coding style and names no model. The report documents no infected victim device; of two device IDs in the command logs, one apparently belongs to the attacker’s own test phone, and Hunt.io describes the activity as probable attacker testing.
#

Actor opens over 500 malicious pull requests, later likely through an AI agent (prt-⁠scan)#

augmented to directed‑autonomous · Attack date 2026⁠-⁠03⁠-⁠11
Across six waves and six accounts, an actor opens more than 500 malicious pull requests against GitHub repositories with misconfigured pull_request_target and moves from raw Bash scripts to AI-⁠generated payloads adapted to each target’s tech stack. From the pace and the adaptation to each target in the later waves, Wiz infers agentic tooling that can fork the repositories, analyze them, inject code and submit pull requests. At least two npm packages of one maintainer are compromised; Wiz puts the success rate at under ten percent.
Caveat: The report cites no logs and names no model. Wiz points to an earlier public report: on April 2, 2026, a security researcher had already described the automated campaign; the date here is that of the Wiz analysis.
#

Backdoor with LLM hallmarks against Russian defense companies (WarpPlugin, GOFFEE)#

augmented
According to PT ESC, the Expert Security Center of Positive Technologies, the espionage group GOFFEE (Paper Werewolf) sends employees of Russian organizations archives with a questionnaire supposedly from a state-owned company; the Excel add-⁠in (XLL) inside opens a decoy spreadsheet and, in the background, launches the WarpPlugin backdoor (also called EchoGather), which PT ESC describes as AI-⁠generated. PT ESC has observed this activity since late 2025 and writes that GOFFEE uses AI agents to keep producing new lure files and WarpPlugin variants. According to the Positive Technologies quarterly report, modules found in the group’s attacks on Russian defense companies show typical signs of LLM-⁠generated code, and BI.ZONE, judging by the coding style, thinks a Python loader from the same cluster may have been written with generative AI.
Caveat: PT ESC’s Telegram post gives no evidence for the AI origin; the quarterly report bases it on stylistic traits such as excessive English comments and boilerplate variable names and refers only to some of the samples. PT ESC names no affected organizations or confirmed infections. Intezer, which first described EchoGather in December 2025, considered only the lure documents AI-⁠generated, not the code.
#

Poisoned Apifox CDN file loads likely AI-⁠written stealers#

augmented · Attack date 2026⁠-⁠03⁠-⁠04
From March 4 to 22, 2026, the CDN of Apifox, a client for API development and testing, served a tampered JavaScript file that fetched a second stage from the attackers’ server when the desktop client started; the second stage stole developers’ SSH keys, Git credentials, Kubernetes configurations and npm tokens. According to Tencent, the email address on the Apifox account, also stolen, shows whether a victim works for a company, which could let the attackers pick out specific firms. Tencent’s Yunding Lab concludes from the very cleanly written code and the many Chinese comments that the second stage was generated with AI, and writes that the attackers also made extensive use of AI to build their control platform, a tunneling tool’s control panel and a remote access trojan.
Caveat: Tencent bases the AI assessment on the style and comments of the code and names no model. The blog rce.moe quotes the same Chinese comments and considers it possible that the tampered CDN file and the second stage had different authors, without mentioning AI. Tencent says the tunneling tool and the trojan cannot be linked directly to the Apifox infection. How many users were affected is not known.
#

China-aligned spies load PlugX through possibly LLM-⁠built downloaders (TA416)#

augmented · Attack date February 2026
Starting in February 2026, according to Proofpoint, the China-aligned espionage group TA416 sent links to archives on Google Drive and on a compromised SharePoint instance; they contained a renamed MSBuild executable and a C# project file that MSBuild, once launched, builds into a downloader, which fetches the PlugX backdoor. In January and February the group’s campaigns targeted numerous European government organizations, and later mainly diplomatic missions to the EU and Taiwan. The project files are nearly identical apart from their Base64-encoded URLs; because each URL is preceded by slightly modified comments, Proofpoint says the files may have been created or altered with the assistance of an LLM.
Caveat: Proofpoint considers LLM involvement only possible, bases it solely on the comments and names no model; the assessment does not extend to PlugX itself. The report does not say which recipients the MSBuild chain was sent to or whether any machines were infected.
#

Phishing platform mines stolen Microsoft 365 mailboxes with AI (EvilTokens)#

augmented · Attack date February 2026
EvilTokens, sold as phishing-as-a-service since February 2026, abuses Microsoft’s device-code login (a method in which a code is confirmed on a second device) to capture access tokens for Microsoft 365 mailboxes. According to Sekoia, an AI pipeline reads up to 5,000 stolen emails, looks for payment threads worth exploiting and drafts matching fraud emails; in one incident Microsoft observed, an attacker used the AI feature to pick out compromised users in financial, executive or administrative roles. Microsoft’s investigators found that large portions of the platform itself were written with AI; the company counts more than 12,000 mailboxes taken over in over 10,000 organizations and had EvilTokens taken down with court authorization in September 2026. London police arrested two suspects.
Caveat: Sekoia reconstructs the AI pipeline from the code and could not confirm that every feature of the platform is fully operational; Microsoft documents its use against victims in one observed incident. Microsoft does not say how it identified AI’s share in the platform’s code, and it identifies the victims only by industry and country. The two men arrested have been released on bail while the investigation continues.
#

Malware with a likely AI-⁠built obfuscation layer steals credentials (DeepLoad)#

augmented
ReliaQuest investigated incidents in which users, lured by ClickFix, launched the DeepLoad malware themselves: it hides its payload in the Windows lock screen process, steals credentials and reinfected a cleaned machine three days later through a WMI event subscription. ReliaQuest assesses with high confidence that AI built the obfuscation layer of thousands of meaningless variable assignments; according to Walmart Global Tech, AI also essentially developed SpectrePaste, a fileless delivery system Walmart found while investigating DeepLoad. In May 2026, Nigeria’s IT agency NITDA warned of confirmed active targeting of Nigerian government agencies, financial institutions and businesses with DeepLoad.
Caveat: ReliaQuest bases the AI attribution on the volume and uniformity of the padding, considers a template-based code generator possible, says only likely in its key points and names neither a model nor the number or sector of the victims. Walmart calls SpectrePaste a separate system, again without naming a model or victims. The Nigerian warning offers no evidence of its own for victims or AI use; its wording, originally posted on X, is available only through the press.
#

Lone actor has Claude Code ship a backdoored BuddyBoss plugin#

Key casedirected‑autonomous · Attack date 2026⁠-⁠03⁠-⁠17
A French-speaking lone actor compromises the WordPress platform BuddyBoss and Caseproof’s license server and distributes a backdoored plugin version through the production infrastructure; 246 WordPress sites, more than 29 gigabytes of databases, about 150,000 user accounts and live Stripe keys are affected. From an open directory, Ctrl-Alt-Intel recovered the transcript of a Claude Code session in which the agent itself performs the Cloudflare bypass and the deployment of the tampered version after the actor staged a CTF scenario for it.
Caveat: The transcript begins mid-⁠session and the initial access to the GitHub organization is unclear. Cybernews dates its own publication to March 20 and counts 309 affected sites; Ctrl-Alt-Intel counts 246 sites, did not publish its own report until April 3, and gives a different date, March 24, for the Cybernews report.
#

npm worm with a likely AI-⁠written propagation script (CanisterWorm, TeamPCP)#

augmented
On March 20, 2026, Aikido detected a previously unseen worm that used stolen npm tokens to compromise packages, 28 in the @emilgroup scope and 16 under @opengov by the time of its report, and fetched the address of its payload from a canister (a program on the decentralized blockchain platform Internet Computer, used here as a dead drop); at the time of the report, the canister still pointed to a YouTube video rather than malware. Aikido believes the worm is the work of TeamPCP and says its propagation script, deploy.js, appears to be entirely vibecoded, that is, written with AI. About an hour after the first wave, the operator reworked the worm to search infected machines for npm tokens and use them to spread on its own.
Caveat: Aikido infers the AI share from the look of the code alone and names no model, prompts or other traces. It bases the TeamPCP attribution on the worm surfacing less than a day after the attack on Trivy (a widely used vulnerability scanner for containers and projects) and on its backdoor resembling the one used there.
#

Ransomware gang deploys a likely AI-⁠written EDR killer (Warlock)#

augmented
ESET sees traits strongly suggestive of AI-⁠assisted generation in an EDR killer that the Warlock ransomware gang deployed. The code prints a list of Possible fixes, which ESET calls a pattern typical of AI-⁠generated boilerplate, and instead of exploiting a specific driver it cycles through several commonly abused device names until one works. According to ESET, Warlock routinely deploys several EDR killers per intrusion, sometimes dozens in recent operations.
Caveat: ESET itself concedes that AI assistance in a specific codebase is often practically impossible to prove because no forensic marker reliably distinguishes it from human work, and it names no model. The report gives no victims, no date and no number of intrusions involving this tool.
#

Fake game mods install crypto miners via a likely AI-⁠written script (WinUpdateHelper)#

augmented · Attack date January 2026
According to McAfee Labs, more than 440 ZIP archives disguised as game mods, cheats, drivers and AI tools, hosted on Discord, SourceForge and other sites, install crypto miners or further payloads such as SalatStealer and Mesh Agent on computers mainly in the United States, the United Kingdom and India; seven traceable Bitcoin wallets received about $11,500. The infection is carried out by a PowerShell script that the malicious WinUpdateHelper.dll fetches from the command-and-control server and runs in memory. Explanatory comments and structured sections in it strongly indicate a language model, McAfee says; one comment refers to your GitHub URL, meaning the attackers’ repository.
Caveat: McAfee infers a language model only from the comment style and structure of the script, elsewhere calls it merely likely, and names neither model nor prompt. McAfee has detected variants since December 2024, but the AI-⁠written parts appear to be a recent addition. The victims remain anonymous.
#

Hijacked Ukrainian websites serve iOS exploits with LLM traces (DarkSword, UNC6353)#

augmented · Attack date December 2025
According to Lookout, the likely Russian group UNC6353 used hidden iframes on two compromised Ukrainian websites, a news site from the Donbas and the site of the Seventh Administrative Court of Appeal, to serve the DarkSword exploit chain to visitors running iOS 18.4 through 18.6.2. Written in JavaScript, the chain gains kernel read and write access, sends passwords, messages, photos and crypto wallet data to a command server within minutes and then cleans up after itself. Lookout says patterns in the code suggest that at least some of the implant was created with language models, and it also sees indicators of an LLM in the code of the server that receives the stolen data.
Caveat: Only Lookout brings a language model into it; Google’s Threat Intelligence Group (GTIG) and iVerify, which reported on the case the same day, do not mention AI. Lookout relies on code patterns for the implant and on a folder emoji and a checkmark in a heading for the server, and considers it possible that both predate UNC6353’s acquisition of the tools. Lookout describes only a potential infection, of an employee at a Ukrainian food manufacturer on February 12, 2026.
#

Interlock group uses a likely AI-⁠written C2 client (Slopoly, Hive0163)#

augmented
IBM X-Force finds the PowerShell C2 client Slopoly in the arsenal of Hive0163, which deploys Interlock ransomware; the client maintained access to a victim server for more than a week and, in the investigators’ assessment, was likely written by a language model.
Caveat: X-Force could not determine the model. The report describes a single incident response engagement and names no victim, not even by sector or region.
#

Iranian cluster uses a likely AI-⁠written wiper against Stryker (Void Manticore)#

augmented
In its destructive wave against Israel and US targets such as the medical technology company Stryker, the Iranian cluster Void Manticore, also known as Handala, distributes a PowerShell wiper via group policy alongside the Handala wiper; based on code structure and detailed comments, Check Point considers the PowerShell wiper likely developed with AI assistance.
Caveat: Check Point frames the AI origin as a likelihood.
#

CodeWall’s AI agent gains admin rights over a company account at Jack & Jill#

directed‑autonomous · Attack date 2026⁠-⁠02⁠-⁠28
In late February 2026, security firm CodeWall turned its autonomous attack agent loose on the AI recruiting platform Jack & Jill. According to CodeWall, the agent chained four seemingly harmless bugs, used an SSRF flaw to read the API documentation and the authentication service’s configuration without logging in, created an account with a static test code and gained full administrator rights over the company account after company onboarding. CodeWall reported the flaws to Jack & Jill’s CEO on March 5; a patch followed within an hour.
Caveat: CodeWall names no permission, bug bounty program or responsible disclosure policy for this test. All details come from CodeWall, which itself offers the agent; the takeover is shown only for the company account under CodeWall’s own domain, and the post shows no data belonging to other customers.
#

Chrome extension under a new owner serves likely AI-⁠assisted malicious scripts (ShotBird)#

augmented · Attack date 2026⁠-⁠03⁠-⁠05
According to a researcher who publishes as monxresearch-sec, the Chrome extension ShotBird apparently changed owners and then loaded scripts from a command server that captured form input such as passwords and card data and injected fake Chrome updates. On an affected Windows machine, PowerShell logs from March 5, 2026 show that such an update ran a stager whose second stage targets stored credentials and browser data. The researcher spotted the scripts through debug output in their own browser’s console and, citing that output, mixed-language comments and redundant fallback logic, considers it likely that the payloads were assembled with AI help.
Caveat: The report comes from a single researcher who infers AI involvement from stylistic features, says only likely and names no model. Execution is confirmed on at least one machine; the report does not say explicitly whose it is and names no further victims.
#

Phishing in Algeria, Kuwait and Mongolia, a Turkish malware prompt in related files#

augmented · Attack date February 2026
According to PT ESC, the Expert Security Center of Positive Technologies, in late February and early March 2026 an attacker sent archives to organizations in Algeria, Kuwait and Mongolia, disguised as messages from energy companies, government bodies and the military; an LNK shortcut inside fetched scripts that used the Rclone sync tool to upload Telegram data and desktop documents to the attacker’s account on the Mega cloud storage service. Among related files PT ESC found loaders for the XMRig cryptominer and comments in Turkish, and it also found a Turkish prompt the attacker used to have a language model write malware, casting the model as an uninhibited, flirtatious female hacker. Over 81 days the miners earned about 436 rubles on infected machines.
Caveat: PT ESC does not say which files the language model produced, and the post names no model. Nor does it say how PT ESC links the phishing, the miners and the prompt; the related files were uploaded from Turkey through the VirusTotal web interface. Whether any of the targeted organizations were compromised remains open; only the miners’ earnings show infected machines.
#

Actor uses a language model to find the most valuable Salesforce data (GRUB1)#

augmented to directed‑autonomous · Attack date August 2025
In the company’s first threat report, Cloudflare’s threat intelligence team Cloudforce One describes the actor GRUB1, which captured OAuth access through the Salesloft Drift integration that exposed hundreds of Salesforce environments. To find its way around the unfamiliar environments and identify the data tables with the most valuable contents, the actor used a language model in real time, shortly before accessing the production instances. Cloudflare itself was among those affected in August 2025.
Caveat: Cloudflare shows no artifact for the AI part and names no model or agent; the report says the model bridged knowledge gaps, and whether it only advised or ran queries itself is unclear. The statement is in the PDF report, not in the blog post.
#

Attackers fail to crack a password manager with likely AI-⁠written malware#

augmented
During an incident response engagement, security firm CyberCX found custom malware that attackers used to try to decrypt the database of an internal password manager; the attempt failed. CyberCX considers it likely that the code was written with generative AI, pointing to emoji and tutorial-style comments.
Caveat: CyberCX makes the underlying report available only after registration; the details come from articles by the trade outlet ARN and the Australian Financial Review. Neither article names the victim or the model, and only the Financial Review dates the case, loosely, to 2025.
#

Backdoors with AI traces targeting Iraqi government officials (Dust Specter)#

augmented · Attack date January 2026
In January 2026 Zscaler ThreatLabz observed attackers posing as Iraq’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs to target Iraqi government officials with the previously unknown backdoors TWINTALK and GHOSTFORM; one archive containing GHOSTFORM was hosted on the compromised government website ca.iq. Zscaler infers that generative AI was used in developing the malware from emojis in the code and from a seed value in a checksum function that appears to be a placeholder commonly found in AI-⁠generated code. Zscaler links the actor, which it tracks internally as Dust Specter, to Iran.
Caveat: Zscaler bases the AI origin on stylistic features of the code, and the report names no model. It rates the Iran-nexus attribution as medium-to-high confidence in one place and as moderate in another. Zscaler gives no count of infected machines, and the report infers from the lures and file names that the officials were the targets.
#

Self-described Claude agent attacks GitHub workflows and hijacks Trivy (hackerbot-claw)#

Key casedirected‑autonomous · Attack date 2026⁠-⁠02⁠-⁠27
A GitHub account describing itself as an autonomous security agent powered by Claude Opus 4.5 attacks CI/CD workflows at Microsoft, Datadog, CNCF, RustPython and Aqua Security between February 21 and March 2, 2026 and achieves code execution in at least six of seven targets according to StepSecurity. Pillar counts six targets and five successes for the same incident; at Datadog, both attempts, including a prompt injection against the AI-⁠assisted issue triage, came to nothing. At aquasecurity/trivy the account exfiltrates a GitHub token with write permissions, deletes 97 releases by Pillar’s count, makes the repository private and pushes a trojanized extension of Trivy (a widely used vulnerability scanner for containers and projects) to OpenVSX (an open marketplace for editor extensions); Pillar rates the operation as human-strategic and LLM-⁠tactical and measures eleven seconds from fork to push.
Caveat: The number of deleted releases is disputed: the Trivy maintainers list 178 releases from version 0.27.0 through 0.69.1 in their own write-up, and StepSecurity gives no number at all. According to Socket, the trojanized extension was built to have users’ AI command-line tools such as Claude Code and Codex (OpenAI’s coding agent) search the system with the attacker’s prompts; whether this happened on any user’s machine is unknown, and Socket knows of no confirmed exfiltration.
#

Suspected AI agent attacks a web honeypot over Tor#

directed‑autonomous · Attack date 2026⁠-⁠02⁠-⁠19
Beelzebub put a web honeypot online and, on February 19, 2026, logged 58 requests in just under 19 minutes from a Tor exit node, a pattern Beelzebub says is consistent with an autonomous agent driven by a language model. The visitor pulled test credentials from an HTML comment, tried them and fired SQL injection and XSS attempts in the same second; it then switched to a Python script written on the spot that also tested template and command injection in a single pass. Between the bursts came pauses of up to seven minutes, which Beelzebub reads as the model’s thinking time.
Caveat: A honeypot was hit, not a real victim; the entry is listed as a honeypot case for that reason. According to the follow-up post, the agent verdict leans on behavioral inference; Beelzebub does not report that the visitor responded to the embedded prompt injection lures, which it says would only affect a language model. Model and operator are unknown.
#

Hacktivists hit Russian agencies and companies with AI-⁠generated scripts (Forbidden Hyena)#

augmented
On the command server of the hacktivist cluster Forbidden Hyena, BI.ZONE found obviously AI-⁠generated scripts, two PowerShell scripts for persistence and AnyDesk and a Bash script that loads an implant of the open-source C2 framework Sliver, with debug strings, detailed comments and readable variable names without obfuscation. The goal is to deploy the BlackReaperRAT backdoor, followed by encryption with the Milkyway ransomware; the victims are Russian government agencies and companies in healthcare, energy, engineering, retail and utilities.
Caveat: The report names no individual victim organizations, only the country and sectors.
#

One operator steers Claude Code and GPT-⁠4.1 against nine Mexican government agencies#

Key caseaugmented to directed‑autonomous · Attack date 2025⁠-⁠12⁠-⁠27
From three rented servers, Gambit Security reconstructs the work of a single operator against nine Mexican government agencies between late December 2025 and mid-⁠February 2026: Claude Code generates and executes about 75 percent of all commands run on the servers, 1,088 prompts yield 5,317 commands, and in parallel GPT-⁠4.1 turns data from 305 servers into 2,597 intelligence reports. Dragos describes Claude independently identifying a SCADA interface at the Monterrey water utility as a target and steering an unsuccessful password spray; Trend Micro, CloudSEK, Unit 42 and Oasis Security describe the same complex from their own findings, linked by shared infrastructure addresses.
Caveat: No Mexican authority has confirmed the incident, and four of the nine agencies deny it. Dragos saw no access to the OT environment and warns against hype around agentic AI. The details of the jailbreak mechanics are in Gambit’s PDF report, not on the linked page.
#

Akira group dumps Veeam credentials with Gemini-generated scripts (PUNK SPIDER)#

augmented
In its 2026 Global Threat Report, CrowdStrike writes that PUNK SPIDER runs AI-⁠generated scripts for post-exploitation during attacks; the group is behind the Akira ransomware and was the most active big game hunting adversary of 2025. According to the report, the group has used Gemini-generated scripts to dump credentials from Veeam Backup & Replication databases and likely uses DeepSeek-generated scripts to terminate database services and destroy forensic evidence. CrowdStrike observed 198 PUNK SPIDER intrusions in its telemetry in 2025.
Caveat: CrowdStrike names no victims or number of cases involving AI scripts and does not say how it identified the models; it considers it only likely that the group also uses DeepSeek-generated scripts. The model names appear only in the report itself, which CrowdStrike releases only through a sign-up form; a later CrowdStrike blog post dates the AI scripts to late 2025 and early 2026.
#

Low-⁠skilled actor takes over 600 FortiGate devices with DeepSeek and Claude Code#

augmented to directed‑autonomous · Attack date 2026⁠-⁠01⁠-⁠11
According to Amazon, an actor of low to medium capability compromises more than 600 FortiGate devices in more than 55 countries between January 11 and February 18, 2026, not through a vulnerability but through exposed management interfaces with weak single-factor credentials. At least two commercial language models supply his attack plans, reconnaissance tools and lateral movement strategies; whenever he tries more than the most straightforward automated paths, he largely fails. A second analysis of the same infrastructure by Cyber and Ramen shows DeepSeek as planner, a custom MCP server named ARXON and a settings file that lets Claude Code run tools such as Impacket (a toolkit for attacks on Windows network protocols) and Metasploit (a widely used attack tool with ready-made exploits) without asking for approval.
Caveat: Cyber and Ramen counts operation logs across 2,516 targets in 106 countries. On March 6, Fortinet confirms after its own investigation that the attack tools were generated from prompts to AI systems, and speaks of only a few affected customers. Team Cymru found the AI platform CyberStrikeAI on one of the actor’s addresses along with traffic to FortiGate targets, but does not show that the platform carried out the attacks. No source names a victim organization.
#

Iranian group uses a backdoor with AI traces in the Middle East (Olalampo, MuddyWater)#

augmented · Attack date August 2025
In the Rust backdoor CHAR of the Iranian group MuddyWater, Group-IB found debug strings with emojis, an artifact rarely seen in human-authored code; targets are government, telecommunications, energy and critical infrastructure in the Middle East and North Africa. Unit 42 independently analyzed the same program under the name LampoRAT; disguised as a Kaspersky process, it was used against a marine and energy company in the Middle East, and Unit 42 characterizes the group’s AI use as an emerging, not yet standardized practice. Two weeks later, Ctrl-Alt-Intel recovered the same actor’s command server components from one of his servers and likewise found emojis in the output of his self-built command server KeyC2, emojis it reads as a sign of AI-⁠assisted development.
Caveat: Unit 42 dates the attack waves to August 2025 through February 2026.
#

Likely AI-⁠built remote access trojan poses as remote management tool (TrustConnect)#

augmented · Attack date January 2026
In late January 2026, Proofpoint discovered TrustConnect, a remote access trojan posing as remote monitoring and management software and rented out for $300 a month; from January 27 on, multiple threat actors were confirmed distributing it in email campaigns. According to Proofpoint, the website, which doubled as customer portal and command server, and the agent installed on victims’ machines were likely coded with the assistance of AI agents, as was the significantly more advanced successor DocConnect. Working with partners, Proofpoint took down part of the infrastructure on February 17.
Caveat: Proofpoint bases the AI assessment on website artifacts and the program’s functionality and names no model. The report gives no number of infected machines, and Proofpoint had seen DocConnect only in testing by the time of publication.
#

Partly LLM-⁠generated npm packages steal developer credentials (Ghost Loader)#

augmented
Panther found at least eight packages carrying Ghost Loader in the npm registry, among them React ecosystem typosquats and fake AI trading tools; a setup wizard tricks developers into entering their sudo password, after which the malware harvests browser credentials, cryptocurrency wallets, SSH keys and cloud configurations. The stolen data goes to the Telegram bots of three affiliates; the bot configuration is stored in smart contracts on the Binance Smart Chain. Panther assesses with high confidence that the malware was at least partially LLM-⁠generated, citing among other things extremely verbose comments in perfect English in early versions.
Caveat: Panther gives neither victims nor download counts. The code could not be attributed to a specific model, and according to Panther some features, such as the blockchain-based command channel, point at least partly to human involvement.
#

Ransomware operators deploy their payload with scripts consistent with AI help#

augmented
In a ransomware case, Unit 42 recovered the scripts the attackers used to deploy the payload, coordinate lateral movement and disable security controls at scale. According to Unit 42, several traits are consistent with AI-⁠assisted development, including unusually thorough comments, templated variants and efficiency-focused fallback logic. Across hundreds of systems the scripts ran with machine-like uniformity, cutting the time and effort a multi-stage deployment usually takes.
Caveat: Unit 42 calls the traits only consistent with AI-⁠assisted development and names neither a model nor a group. The annual report covers the case in a few sentences, without the victim or the timing.
#

Actor uses Gemini to scout accounts, then targets them with phishing (UNC6418)#

augmented
Google’s Threat Intelligence Group (GTIG) observed the unattributed actor UNC6418 misusing Gemini for targeted intelligence gathering, specifically seeking out sensitive account credentials and email addresses. Shortly after, the actor targeted all these accounts in a phishing campaign focused on Ukraine and the defense sector. Google disabled the assets associated with this activity.
Caveat: GTIG names neither the accounts nor their number nor the organizations behind them and gives no timeframe and no outcome of the campaign.
#

Likely AI-⁠generated script exploits React2Shell and mines Monero on 91 hosts#

augmented
Darktrace finds a Python tool in its CloudyPots honeypot network, placed by an attacker through a Docker daemon left internet-facing without authentication. The script picks targets itself, exploits the React2Shell vulnerability CVE-⁠2025-⁠55182 and installs the Monero miner XMRig; the mining pool statistics show 91 workers, meaning 91 infected hosts. Darktrace considers the script fully AI generated, pointing to a comment density untypical for malware, to the opening comment Educational/Research Purpose Only, and to a test with GPTZero (a tool meant to detect machine-generated text).
Caveat: A honeypot was hit, not a real victim; the entry is listed as a honeypot case for that reason. The honeypot was only the observation point, and Darktrace names no victim and confirms no individual incident. The evidence for AI authorship is indirect: a detection tool rated the code as likely model generated, and Darktrace reads the opening comment as suggesting the attacker jailbroke a model by framing the request as educational. What Darktrace says about the person behind the campaign is, by its own account, not a confirmed attribution.
#

Linux framework hits tech companies, version 2.0 written with TRAE SOLO (VoidLink)#

augmented · Attack date September 2025
According to Cisco Talos, the Linux framework VoidLink has hit multiple victims since September 2025, mostly in the technology sector, along with financial services firms; the actor UAT-⁠9921 breaks into servers with previously obtained credentials or through Java deserialization flaws and installs VoidLink there. Check Point Research had earlier reconstructed from materials on an openly reachable server that a single person had the framework written almost entirely by TRAE SOLO, the AI assistant in the TRAE development environment, starting in late November 2025, and had more than 88,000 lines of working code after one week; Elastic also found traces of a language model in the source of the rootkit components. In the intrusions themselves, UAT-⁠9921 does not appear to use AI tools, according to Talos.
Caveat: Talos names victims only by sector and cannot rule out that the activity is part of red team exercises. Talos assigns the attacks since September to a version 1.0, while Check Point’s AI evidence comes from the development of version 2.0 starting in late November; Talos does not say which version ran in the attacks it observed through January 2026. Check Point considers it likely, not established, that a single person was behind the framework.
#

Attacker becomes AWS admin in eight minutes with likely AI-⁠written code#

augmented to directed‑autonomous · Attack date 2025⁠-⁠11⁠-⁠28
An attacker enters an AWS environment with credentials from publicly accessible S3 buckets, injects code into a Lambda function (the AWS service that runs stored code on demand) with an administrator role and moves through 19 identities, reaching admin rights eight minutes after initial access, before abusing the victim’s models in Amazon Bedrock (the AWS service for accessing language models). A script he uploads to the victim’s account is meant to clone a nonexistent Anthropic repository called training-scripts from GitHub, which Sysdig reads as a sign of code from a language model that hallucinated the name. Sysdig says several indicators suggest that the attacker used such models throughout the operation to automate reconnaissance, generate code and make real-time decisions.
Caveat: Sysdig infers AI use only from indicators: comments and thorough exception handling in the code, the speed, made-up AWS account IDs and the nonexistent repository. The report names no tool or model and does not say whether an agent made the API calls itself or the attacker reused a model’s output. The victim remains anonymous.
#

Partly AI-⁠written wiper hits a manufacturer during a wave of attacks in Poland (LazyWiper)#

augmented · Attack date 2025⁠-⁠12⁠-⁠29
On December 29, 2025, an attacker strikes more than 30 wind and solar farms in Poland in a coordinated operation, destroys remote terminal units and controllers at the grid connection points and thereby cuts the link to the distribution system operator; a combined heat and power plant and, opportunistically, a manufacturing company are hit in parallel, while according to CERT Polska and CISA electricity production and heat supply continued. LazyWiper, a PowerShell script with one function that CERT Polska assesses as written by a language model, runs at the manufacturer; because the script is largely machine-generated, CERT Polska considers it useless for attribution, while the infrastructure overlaps with the Static Tundra cluster.
Caveat: ESET attributes the DynoWiper at the heat and power plant to Sandworm with medium confidence. The LazyWiper analysis and the AI assessment are in CERT Polska’s full PDF report, not on the linked page.
#

Implant with LLM traces likely targets NGOs documenting Iran’s protests (SloppyMIO)#

augmented
The campaign likely targets NGOs and individuals documenting human rights violations during the Iranian protests. The C# implant exfiltrates files, loads modules, hides its configuration in images and uses GitHub gists, Google Drive and the Telegram bot API; several LLM artifacts were left unsanitized, including a comment touting the stager as ULTRA-RELIABLE & STEALTHY VBSCRIPT STAGER (Final Production Version).
Caveat: HarfangLab attributes the activity with medium confidence to a Farsi-speaking actor aligned with Iranian state interests; the samples come from a multiscanner upload, and the observed infections ran exclusively in sandbox environments. There is no confirmation from any victim.
#

Suspected Vietnamese actor sends fake job offers with likely AI-⁠written loaders (PureRAT)#

augmented
An actor Symantec places in Vietnam sends phishing emails posing as job offers; archives on Dropbox use DLL sideloading to load batch and Python scripts that install PureRAT or an HVNC tool (remote access through a hidden second desktop). Symantec considers it very likely that AI wrote several of these scripts: nearly every step carries a detailed Vietnamese comment, some comments include emojis, and one Python loader still contains the note to paste the HVNC shellcode here.
Caveat: Symantec infers AI solely from the comments, emojis and structure of the code and names no model. The report describes no infected victim; to Symantec, the range of targets and lures points to broad rather than targeted attacks. Symantec infers the Vietnamese origin from language, passwords and account names.
#

Pakistan-based group has language models build new implants daily against India (APT36)#

augmented · Attack date September 2025
The Pakistan-based group APT36 uses language models to produce new throwaway implants in Nim, Zig and Crystal every day for use against the Indian government and diplomatic missions; metadata from AI-⁠integrated code editors and Unicode emojis in the binaries point to machine generation. Bitdefender describes the pattern as an attempt to overwhelm detection with sheer volume, but calls the samples themselves generic, inconsistent and error-prone; one stealer could never exfiltrate data because of a placeholder instead of the C2 address. Zscaler had already documented two of these implants, the backdoors SheetCreep and MailCreep, in January 2026 and read the emojis in SheetCreep’s error handling as a strong sign of AI-⁠assisted development.
Caveat: Bitdefender attributes the activity to APT36 with medium confidence; the attacks themselves remain manual. The analysis names no individual victim organizations, only governments, missions and sectors. Zscaler does not attribute SheetCreep and MailCreep to APT36 itself but assesses with medium confidence that a new APT36 subgroup or a parallel Pakistan-linked group is behind them.
#

North Korean group targets blockchain developers with malware showing AI traces (KONNI)#

augmented
According to Check Point, the North Korean group KONNI targets developer and engineering teams with blockchain ties; VirusTotal submissions from Japan, Australia and India point to an expansion beyond South Korea. The chain runs from a ZIP with decoy PDF and LNK through a PowerShell loader and a backdoor with UAC bypass and disguised OneDrive persistence to SimpleHelp remote access. The verbose header documentation and above all a leftover placeholder comment for the project UUID point to AI.
Caveat: Check Point notes that clean structure and comments alone are not enough to attribute AI origin; only the placeholder comment carries the attribution.
#

Likely AI-⁠written script goes after Veeam credentials at a nonprofit#

augmented
At a nonprofit, an attacker enumerated the network, moved laterally over WinRM and then tried to run a PowerShell script that Huntress classifies as AI-⁠generated: it was meant to read and decrypt the credentials stored in the database of the Veeam backup software. The script failed to run, and defenders shut the attack down.
Caveat: Huntress bases its classification on odd snippets, misplaced comments and a check that, according to a figure caption, consisted of asking an AI, and names no model. The organization and date remain unknown; Huntress’s year-in-review places the case only loosely in 2025.
#

Attacker hunts for Chase banking URLs with a likely AI-⁠written script#

augmented
According to Huntress, an attacker used a rogue ScreenConnect session to drop a PowerShell script that searched Chrome and Edge histories for Chase online banking URLs and sent its findings out through Telegram. The attacker had earlier deployed two predecessors aimed at QuickBooks and Coinbase logins on other hosts; neither worked, and the second still searched for QuickBooks data despite its new target URLs. Huntress lists all three as AI-⁠generated and says the working one shows signs of it.
Caveat: Huntress does not explain its AI assessment and names no model. The year-in-review names no victim, places the case only loosely in 2025 and leaves open whether the other hosts belonged to the same organization.
#

After an RDP break-in, a likely AI-⁠written script tries to dump LSASS#

augmented
According to Huntress, an attacker brute-forced their way in over RDP and ran a PowerShell script meant to pull credentials from a memory dump of the LSASS login process and to try another method if that failed. On review, Huntress found the script suspiciously AI-⁠generated; it contained Cyrillic strings and other sloppy artifacts. Huntress cut off the session and removed the attacker before they could get further into the network.
Caveat: Huntress bases its AI assessment only on how the script looks and names no model. The year-in-review gives no victim and places the case only loosely in 2025. That the script targeted LSASS follows from the code excerpt shown and the year-in-review’s table of techniques; the write-up of the case itself only mentions credential access.

2025

#

Agent model ROME opens a reverse SSH tunnel in training and mines on GPUs#

fully autonomous
During training of the agent model ROME, Alibaba Cloud’s managed firewall flags security policy violations coming from the team’s own training servers: attempts to probe or access internal network resources, and traffic patterns consistent with cryptomining-related activity. The team first takes this for a misconfiguration or an outside compromise, but the violations recur across multiple runs, and correlating them with the team’s own training logs shows that the traffic coincides every time with episodes in which the agent invokes tools and executes code. In the most striking instance it establishes and uses a reverse SSH tunnel from an Alibaba Cloud instance to an external IP address, an outbound-initiated remote access channel that, the paper says, can neutralize ingress filtering; alongside that it repurposes provisioned GPU capacity for mining. Both lie outside the bounds of the intended sandbox, no task prompt had asked for them, and the paper calls them instrumental side effects of autonomous tool use under reinforcement learning optimization.
Caveat: By the paper’s account what was hit was the team’s own training infrastructure, which runs on Alibaba Cloud; whether the tunnel or the mining touched outside systems it does not say, and the entry is therefore listed as a borderline case. Where the tunnel led, which cryptocurrency was involved and how long it ran the paper likewise does not say, and it writes that the firewall flagged the activity, not that it stopped it. It gives no date, only early one morning; the date of this entry is the day the first version appeared on arXiv. The source is the developers’ own report on their own training, not an outside investigation. The paper names the joint team of ROCK, ROLL, iFlow and DT as the authors and Alibaba only as the operator of the infrastructure; attributing the model to Alibaba comes from press coverage.
#

Likely AI-⁠written downloader lands in a honeypot via React2Shell#

augmented
GreyNoise used clustering on more than 50,000 unique payloads that its sensors had caught and executed in the week and a half or so after the React2Shell flaw became known, and found a Node.js downloader that checks whether it is running as root and on Alpine Linux and then fetches and runs a file. GreyNoise considers it highly probable that the script was written with a language model, likely from a human’s instructions: one comment refers to the user’s example, and the comments spell out basics a malware author would not need to explain to themselves. A second payload wraps Mirai-related bot malware in JavaScript that GreyNoise says was almost certainly written by a language model and does not work because of a bug.
Caveat: A honeypot was hit, not a real victim; the entry is listed as a honeypot case for that reason. GreyNoise itself calls verbose comments an unreliable sign of AI and names no model.
#

Student allegedly used ChatGPT to steal 7.25 million records from Japan’s Kaikatsu CLUB#

augmented · Attack date 2025⁠-⁠01⁠-⁠18
Between January 18 and 20, 2025, a student steals about 7.25 million member records of the Japanese internet cafe chain Kaikatsu CLUB and comments on the attacks live on Discord. According to Tokyo police, he wrote the scraping program himself, improved it with ChatGPT and asked the model how to get past the target system’s defenses and how to respond to error messages; in December 2025 the 17-⁠year-old was re-⁠arrested.
Caveat: Police statements; no misuse of the stolen data had been established at the time of the report. In July 2026 police arrested another participant and have since treated the case as a group offense. The operator’s own statement gives 7,290,087 affected records.
#

South Korean VPN site serves a likely AI-⁠written backdoor (NKNShell)#

augmented · Attack date November 2025
According to AhnLab ASEC, a South Korean VPN provider’s website hosted a tampered archive in November 2025 that, alongside the genuine VPN client, used several PowerShell scripts to install the previously unknown NKNShell backdoor and two other remote access tools. ASEC suspects that NKNShell and the scripts were written with generative AI. It attributes the attack to Larva-⁠24010, an actor that has targeted South Korean VPN providers since at least 2023.
Caveat: ASEC bases the AI involvement only on traits in the code, namely Korean comments and emojis, and names no model. The report does not name the VPN provider or give a count of infected machines.
#

Claude Code runs most of a China-attributed campaign (GTG-⁠1002)#

Key casedirected‑autonomous
Claude Code runs as an orchestrator with subagents via MCP against about 30 targets in technology, finance, chemicals and government and carries out 80 to 90 percent of the campaign itself; humans intervene at only four to six decision points. According to Anthropic, the campaign succeeds against only a few targets. The jailbreak comes from role-playing as a contracted pentest firm and breaking the work into innocuous-looking subtasks; Anthropic attributes the actor to China with high confidence and concedes that Claude frequently overstated findings, occasionally fabricated credentials that did not work and presented publicly available information as a critical discovery.
Caveat: No indicators published. Correction of November 14: thousands of requests, often several per second, not thousands per second. The MITRE ATT&CK entry rests entirely on Anthropic’s report and is not independent confirmation.
#

Teenager uses a ChatGPT-built program to open Rakuten lines on other people’s accounts#

augmented
Police in Hyogo Prefecture rearrested a 16-⁠year-old from the city of Kazo and a 21-⁠year-old accomplice who allegedly logged in to Rakuten Mobile with other people’s Rakuten credentials in spring 2024 and signed up for ten eSIM lines. According to investigators, the teenager first typed in the credentials by hand and then used ChatGPT to build a program that enters IDs and passwords automatically and signs up for lines; on his computer police found the program and about 1.5 million stolen IDs with passwords, and the accomplice sold the lines for about 1,000 yen each.
Caveat: The information comes from investigators and the suspect’s statement; there is no verdict, and police are still looking into the details. The Yomiuri Shimbun newspaper mentions the case alongside the three groups of juveniles arrested by Tokyo police since February 2025 but does not link them.
#

Attacker drains Balancer V2 pools with a smart contract believed to be partly AI-⁠written#

augmented · Attack date 2025⁠-⁠11⁠-⁠03
On November 3, 2025, an attacker drained Balancer V2 pools on several blockchains and, according to Halborn, stole more than $120 million; projects built on top of Balancer also lost funds. Halborn believes the attack’s smart contract was partly vibe-coded, that is, copied from a language model. It contained console.log statements of the kind AI models often add; developers usually remove them before deployment because they are meant for debugging and cost transaction fees.
Caveat: Halborn presents the AI involvement only as a belief (believed, may have) and bases it solely on the console.log statements; it names no model.
#

North Korean group hits crypto firms with an AI-⁠assisted stealer (GhostCall, BlueNoroff)#

augmented · Attack date June 2023
The North Korean group BlueNoroff runs the GhostCall and GhostHire campaigns against Web3 and crypto companies in India, Turkey, Australia and other countries, GhostCall since at least mid-⁠2023. As AI evidence, Kaspersky cites comments with check-mark emojis in the SilentSiphon stealer; the profile pictures of supposed participants in fake Zoom calls also carry C2PA metadata (provenance data that image tools write into the file) pointing to editing with GPT-⁠4o.
Caveat: Kaspersky rates the AI image editing with medium-high confidence and makes clear that the video footage consists not of deepfakes but of real recordings of earlier victims.
#

Phishing against Beazley Security via a likely AI-⁠built panel (Quantum Redirector)#

augmented
A phishing email sent to Beazley Security, which employees reported to the company’s security team, led through a Quantum Redirector, a redirect panel that sends bots and researchers to harmless sites and real people through an obfuscated intermediate page to a phishing kit. Beazley Security Labs considers the panel and the obfuscation likely AI-⁠generated, partly because of the name Quantum and individual coding errors. Beazley found several hundred more Quantum Redirectors whose landing pages almost all imitated email services, and it is working with law enforcement to take the redirectors down.
Caveat: Beazley infers a language model only from the name, style and errors of the code, partly in jest, and names neither model nor prompt. The report does not say whether recipients of the other redirectors entered credentials, and it names no victims.
#

Likely AI-⁠written loader script drops a remote access trojan on a PC (DCRat)#

augmented
Blackpoint, a managed detection and response provider, describes an incident in which a user landed on a fake Booking.com page and a bogus captcha got them to paste a command into the Windows Run dialog. A loader script then pulled the DCRat remote access trojan into memory, set it to start at logon and excluded its folder from Defender scans. Blackpoint considers the script AI-⁠generated because it contains placeholder comments, separator lines made of equals signs and leftover prompt text in Russian, and calls a made-up function, Invoke-Distraction, meant only to distract analysts.
Caveat: Blackpoint bases the AI attribution on style traits and names no model. The victim, industry and date are not given, and the report does not say whether DCRat stole any data.
#

Partly AI-⁠written banking trojan spreads via WhatsApp in Brazil (Maverick)#

augmented · Attack date October 2025
A mass campaign in Brazil distributes the new banking trojan Maverick over WhatsApp; on infected computers it hijacks the victim’s messenger account, sends itself on to the contacts and is designed to capture credentials on the websites of 26 Brazilian banks. Kaspersky blocked 62,000 infection attempts in the first ten days of October alone and writes that Maverick has infected many people in Brazil. According to Kaspersky, the code was written with AI, especially the routine that decrypts the certificate for the command-and-control channel; Trend Micro, which tracks the campaign as Water Saci, found circumstantial evidence in December 2025 that the attackers had a language model port their spreading script from PowerShell to Python.
Caveat: Kaspersky shows no evidence for the AI involvement and, in its conclusion, treats it as demonstrated only for the certificate decryption and merely possible for the rest of the code. Trend Micro calls a language model or another code-translation tool plausible but not proven, and links the banking trojan of the December wave to the Casbaneiro (Metamorfo) family. Neither gives a number of actual infections, and the victims remain anonymous.
#

Group targets aviation firms with a likely AI-⁠written file grabber (Librarian Likho)#

augmented · Attack date September 2025
Kaspersky describes a targeted phishing campaign that the Librarian Likho group, also known as Rare Werewolf, has been running since September 2025 against companies in Russia’s aviation and radio industries. According to Kaspersky, the group, which otherwise relies on legitimate third-party software, used malware of its own for the first time, including a file grabber written in C# that collects documents from user folders and emails them to the attackers. Kaspersky considers it most likely that the group wrote the grabber with an AI assistant, pointing to debug comments on nearly every action in the code that the attackers did not bother to remove.
Caveat: Kaspersky bases the AI assessment solely on these comments and names neither a model nor individual victims; the report does not say whether any data was stolen.
#

China-linked group uses ChatGPT for spear phishing in five languages (GOVERSHELL, UTA0388)#

augmented to directed‑autonomous · Attack date June 2025
A China-aligned group uses language models to generate multilingual spear-phishing campaigns in English, Mandarin, Japanese, French and German, complete with invented sender organizations, and develops the GOVERSHELL backdoor in five variants; the targets were Volexity customers in North America, Asia and Europe. Volexity concluded independently from its own evidence that the group used AI; shortly before Volexity published, OpenAI had confirmed in its own report that the group used ChatGPT. Based on features of the emails, Volexity assesses with medium confidence that in some cases automation generated the content and sent it to targets with little to no human oversight.
Caveat: Volexity notes that no single artifact is conclusive on its own. It leaves open whether an AI agent, other automation or a human operator who did not review the outputs sent the emails, and it cites no agent logs.
#

Likely AI-⁠generated stealer hits Ukrainian authorities (WRECKSTEEL, UAC-⁠0219)#

augmented · Attack date March 2025
In March 2025, CERT-UA documented attacks on Ukrainian government bodies and critical infrastructure with a PowerShell stealer that exfiltrated documents and screenshots. In its half-year report of October 2025, Ukraine’s State Service of Special Communications and Information Protection (SSSCIP), which CERT-UA belongs to, writes that there are grounds to believe WRECKSTEEL’s PowerShell scripts were generated with AI. More generally, it says several malware samples it investigated show clear signs of AI generation and it expects attackers to expand their use of AI.
Caveat: The report gives no evidence for the AI attribution and frames it for WRECKSTEEL only as a reasoned assumption; the date is that of this report, not of the first alert in March.
#

Ransomware apparently built through vibe coding encrypts a file server (MadiLock)#

augmented
In summer 2025, the Norwegian incident response firm Defendable investigated an attack on a file server involving MadiLock, ransomware that had not been publicly analyzed before; the attackers probably got in through a flaw in SonicWall’s SSL VPN and kept access with SoftEther VPN. Defendable suspects MadiLock was written partly or entirely with a language model, pointing to consistently descriptive function names, verbose success and failure messages, and original files that are merely deleted rather than overwritten, as if someone had simply asked a model to remove each file after encryption.
Caveat: Defendable calls the AI origin a theory based on style traits, also considers an inexperienced developer possible and names no model. The victim and country are not named, and the investigation could not pin down the point of entry.
#

Likely AI-⁠obfuscated SVG attachment in phishing emails to US organizations#

augmented · Attack date August 2025
On August 18, 2025, a phishing campaign that Microsoft describes as limited, sent from the compromised email account of a small business, delivered an SVG attachment disguised as a PDF, meant to steal credentials, mainly to US organizations; Microsoft Defender for Office 365 detected and blocked it. The file hides its function in a sequence of business terms that embedded JavaScript turns back into code, which redirects the browser to the phishing page. Microsoft’s AI tool Security Copilot judged the code highly likely synthetic and likely generated by a language model.
Caveat: The AI attribution rests only on style features assessed by Microsoft’s own AI tool, and Microsoft itself says only that the campaign likely used AI-⁠generated code. The targeted organizations remain anonymous, and because of the block Microsoft saw only the first page of the chain.
#

Worm with a likely LLM-⁠generated payload compromises hundreds of npm packages (Shai-Hulud)#

augmented · Attack date 2025⁠-⁠09⁠-⁠15
Wiz calls Shai-Hulud the first successful self-propagating attack in the npm ecosystem; the worm compromises hundreds of packages, including @ctrl/tinycolor with millions of weekly downloads. On September 17, Wiz notes that one of the payloads looks machine-generated while a second variant does not share the pattern; based on comments and emojis, Unit 42 assesses the worm’s Bash script as LLM-⁠generated with moderate confidence. Wiz considers the campaign a direct follow-on of the s1ngularity/Nx compromise in late August 2025, through which GitHub tokens and then npm tokens were stolen.
Caveat: Unit 42 and Wiz present the AI attribution only as likely, not as established. Wiz published on September 16; the AI observation was added a day later.
#

Likely AI-⁠written loaders infect hotel front desks (RevengeHotels, TA558)#

augmented
RevengeHotels attacks hotel front desks, in the 2025 campaign mainly in Brazil and with Spanish-language lures; according to Kaspersky, earlier victims were in countries including Argentina, Mexico and Spain. Kaspersky considers the JavaScript loaders and PowerShell downloaders, which ultimately deliver VenomRAT, machine-generated because almost every action is commented, placeholders were left in and the code is not obfuscated.
Caveat: Kaspersky consistently frames the AI origin as an assessment. The report names no individual victim organizations, only countries.
#

Attacker installs security software on their own machine and exposes their AI use#

augmented · Attack date 2025⁠-⁠07⁠-⁠09
On July 9, 2025, an attacker installs a Huntress trial on his own working machine and thereby exposes his browser history from May 29 to July 9: an automation platform with Telegram bots for phishing workflows, searches for free AI services without sign-up, the use of several text generators to process data, and searches for other people’s instances of Evilginx (a tool that mirrors login pages and captures session cookies). Huntress links the infrastructure to more than 2,471 identities accessed in two weeks.
Caveat: Huntress suspects without firm evidence that the machine serves several actors as a jump host.
#

Lone criminal extorts at least 17 organizations with Claude Code (GTG-⁠2002)#

Key casedirected‑autonomous
A lone criminal extorts at least 17 organizations in healthcare, emergency services, government and religious institutions. Claude Code handles reconnaissance, credential harvesting and network intrusion, chooses which data to exfiltrate, calculates the ransom from the stolen financial data and writes the extortion note to hit each victim’s specific pressure points; instead of encrypting, he threatens publication and sometimes demands more than 500,000 dollars.
Caveat: The account rests on Anthropic’s own telemetry; victims and damage are not independently confirmed.
#

Suspected Chinese actor attacks Vietnamese telecom companies with Claude#

augmented
Anthropic describes an actor whose tradecraft, language and targeting are consistent with Chinese APT operations and who used Claude as an advisor and code developer in 12 of 14 MITRE ATT&CK tactics during a nine-month campaign against critical infrastructure in Vietnam. With Claude, the actor built WordPress exploitation frameworks and privilege escalation exploits for Linux kernel vulnerabilities, among other things. According to Anthropic, the actor appears to have compromised major Vietnamese telecommunications providers, government databases and agricultural management systems.
Caveat: Anthropic presents the compromises only as apparent and considers an intelligence collection operation likely; the announcement accompanying the report speaks only of an attempt against Vietnamese telecommunications infrastructure. The report names no victims, dates or indicators; the account rests solely on Anthropic’s own investigation.
#

Nx malware makes victims’ AI assistants hunt for secrets (s1ngularity)#

Key caseaugmented · Attack date 2025⁠-⁠08⁠-⁠26
On August 26, 2025, attackers used a stolen npm token to publish tampered versions of the Nx build system; their install script collected environment variables and GitHub and npm tokens and uploaded them to public repositories in each victim’s own account. If Claude Code, Gemini CLI (Google’s command-line agent) or Amazon Q (Amazon’s AI assistant for developers) was installed, the script launched the tool with permission checks disabled and its own prompt telling it to search for wallets, keys and configuration files; Wiz saw this succeed in hundreds of cases. Google calls the malware QUIETVAULT and describes one victim on whose machine it tried to enlist the AI tool; the actor UNC6426 turned that victim’s GitHub token into AWS administrator access in under 72 hours.
Caveat: The AI belonged to the victim; the attacker used it through their malicious code. The sources differ on how often the AI step worked: GitGuardian found the requested file list on 95 of 366 systems where the malware invoked an AI tool, and Wiz later estimated that the AI helped exfiltrate data in under a quarter of cases. Google does not say whether the attempt worked at UNC6426’s victim.
#

Hijacked WordPress site runs an apparently AI-⁠built malicious plugin (woocommerce_inputs)#

augmented · Attack date July 2025
GoDaddy Security describes the malicious plugin woocommerce_inputs, which attackers install on WordPress sites using admin credentials that were likely stolen; it sends visitors through Help TDS (a service that routes traffic from hijacked websites to scam pages) to tech support scams and passes the site’s usernames and email addresses to the attackers. In July 2025 GoDaddy found version 3.0.0 on an infected site, which GoDaddy says appears to be a custom, AI-⁠generated variant. Its code grew from about 10 to 200 KB and is meant to infect every website on a server and remove competing malware, but according to GoDaddy it is riddled with bugs, which likely explains why it rarely turns up.
Caveat: GoDaddy says only that the version appears to be AI-⁠generated and does not explain why; it is documented on a single, unnamed website. In GoDaddy’s assessment it does not come from the Help TDS operators.
#

Likely AI-⁠written apps smuggle in a backdoor (JustAskJacky, TamperedChef)#

augmented · Attack date May 2025
G DATA describes free programs that do what they promise while carrying a backdoor, offered on professional-looking websites: the JustAskJacky advice app, which launches itself several times a day through a scheduled task and runs commands from its command server, and a recipe app called TamperedChef, which executes commands hidden in the spaces and tabs of its recipes. For TamperedChef, G DATA sees strong indicators that a language model wrote the code, which is neatly structured and thoroughly commented, down to comments that reveal the use of steganography. Trend Micro tracks both apps as EvilAI, says JustAskJacky’s code was also produced with AI and, in the week starting August 29, 2025, logged the most detections in India, the US and France.
Caveat: G DATA itself says it does not know for sure that a language model was involved and relies on the structure and comments of the code; Trend Micro gives no evidence for JustAskJacky. The country figures come from detections in Trend’s own telemetry and are not broken down by app.
#

npm package drains crypto wallets, code likely written by Claude (@kodane/patch-manager)#

augmented · Attack date 2025⁠-⁠07⁠-⁠28
Safety found a wallet drainer in the npm package @kodane/patch-manager, which posed as a cache manager for the npm registry; after installation it sets itself up as a persistent background process and transfers the balance of any Solana wallets it finds to a hardcoded address. Starting July 28, 2025, the author published 19 versions within two days; before npm blocked the package on July 30, it was downloaded more than 1,500 times, and on the openly accessible command-and-control server Safety saw two compromised machines. According to Safety, the package appears to have been written by Claude, judging among other things by emojis in the source code, verbose comments and the name suffix Enhanced.
Caveat: The Claude attribution rests solely on stylistic features. Safety documents victims through just two encoded machine names, and it merely assumes that the many transactions on the destination address came from victims of the package. The report is now available only in the Internet Archive.
#

Likely AI-⁠assisted malware hides a rootkit in panda images (Koske)#

augmented
The Koske malware enters through a misconfigured instance of JupyterLab (a notebook environment for Python) and delivers two panda pictures as polyglot JPEGs (files that are a valid image and executable code at once) from which two things emerge: an in-⁠memory-compiled rootkit and a shell script that persists through cron and systemd, overwrites the DNS settings and flushes the iptables rules. The miners support 18 cryptocurrencies and pick one based on the hardware. Aqua sees clear signs of AI-⁠assisted development in the verbose comments, modularity and adaptability.
Caveat: A honeypot was hit, not a real victim; the entry is listed as a honeypot case for that reason. Aqua’s own post names no victim; that the find came from a honeypot is stated by an Aqua research lead in Dark Reading. The attack is documented with indicators; Aqua infers the AI origin only from style. Whether the interspersed Serbian phrases obscure authorship or point to the author’s origin is left open by an independent follow-up analysis, which also shows a translation error in Aqua’s reading.
#

Malware gets its commands from Qwen2.5-Coder at runtime (LAMEHUG, APT28)#

augmented
CERT-UA reports malware against Ukraine’s security and defense sector that queries a language model at runtime, Qwen2.5-Coder-⁠32B via the Hugging Face API, to generate Windows commands for reconnaissance and document theft from text descriptions and execute them immediately. According to the annual report of CSIRT GOV, the emergency response team run by Poland’s internal security agency ABW, a LAMEHUG version disguised as an AI image generator was also used against targets in Poland.
Caveat: CERT-UA attributes the activity to APT28 with moderate confidence; the model and provider are named in the original alert of July 17, while the later page of Ukraine’s CSIRT from July 28 does not name them.
#

AI chatbots help affiliates negotiate with victims (GLOBAL GROUP)#

augmented · Attack date 2025⁠-⁠06⁠-⁠02
The ransomware group GLOBAL GROUP, launched on June 2, 2025 by the actor behind the Mamona ransomware, lists 17 victims in the US, UK, Australia and Brazil from healthcare, industry and services within six weeks. Its negotiation portal uses AI chatbots so that non-⁠English-speaking affiliates can handle victims themselves; EclecticIQ reviewed a transcript demanding one million dollars, about 9.5 bitcoin, within 48 hours.
Caveat: The AI link also rests on the actor’s own promotional video, not only on the negotiation transcript reviewed; EclecticIQ rates GLOBAL GROUP as a rebranding of BlackLock with only medium confidence. The report names no individual victim organizations, only counts, countries and sectors.
#

Fake gaming app spreads malware developed with ChatGPT (ScopeCreep)#

augmented
According to OpenAI, an apparently Russian-speaking actor used ChatGPT to develop multi-stage Windows malware in Go step by step and got help setting up its command-and-control server. ScopeCreep was distributed through a public repository posing as Crosshair-X, a popular program that overlays a custom crosshair in video games; anyone who ran the fake pulled further malicious files from the attacker’s infrastructure, designed to steal browser-stored credentials, tokens and cookies. OpenAI banned the accounts, and the code hosting provider took the fake down.
Caveat: OpenAI considers the malware only likely to have been active in the wild, points to some samples on VirusTotal and saw no evidence of widespread distribution; by its own account it disrupted the operation in what looked like an early stage. The report names no victim.
#

Attacker uploads a likely AI-⁠generated miner script through an unprotected Open WebUI#

augmented
At a Sysdig customer, a training system running Open WebUI (a web interface for running language models) sits on the internet without authentication and with administrator privileges. Through it, the attacker uploads a Python script obfuscated 64 layers deep that fetches the crypto miners T-Rex and XMRig; a detection tool rates the payload as 85 to 90 percent likely AI-⁠generated or heavily AI-⁠assisted.
Caveat: The AI attribution rests on a classifier, not recovered artifacts; Sysdig considers parts of the payload hand-written.
#

Chinese student harasses fellow students by text message with an AI-⁠written program#

augmented
According to the cybersecurity bureau of China’s Ministry of Public Security, a student surnamed Hu broke into a system at his university and obtained more than 20,000 student records. Through a vulnerability he had previously found in a mini program (an app that runs inside a larger app), he used AI-⁠written software to register accounts in bulk with the stolen phone numbers and replaced the SMS verification codes with obscene content that went to the students. Hu has confessed to illegally obtaining data from computer systems.
Caveat: The only source is a brief police statement that names neither the university, the location, the time of the offense nor the AI tool; the case was still under investigation. It gives more than 2,000 affected students in one place and more than 1,000 in another, and the AI share concerns only the registration program, not the break-in.
#

Actor builds stealers, C2 servers and phishing pages with ChatGPT (EncryptHub, LARVA-⁠208)#

augmented
A misconfigured directory on EncryptHub’s command server exposed configuration files and the Telegram bot, and in the end Outpost24 also had the attacker’s own ChatGPT conversations. They show him using ChatGPT to build clippers (malware that swaps copied wallet addresses in the clipboard) and cookie stealers, Telegram bots, C2 servers, phishing pages, mail servers and onion services, and to translate negotiations and write the forum ads with which he put two exploits up for sale on March 11, 2025. Prodaft counts at least 618 compromised organizations for the same group since June 2024.
Caveat: For the vulnerability research phase, Outpost24 cannot prove the AI share but considers it very likely.
#

Operator has ChatGPT write a fake letter mid-⁠intrusion (Black Basta)#

augmented · Attack date 2024⁠-⁠02⁠-⁠21
In the leaked internal chats of the ransomware group Black Basta, GuidePoint Security finds an example from February 21, 2024: the operator nn recounts that the person at the machine noticed something was wrong when the operator took over the computer, and that this person started to panic, so the operator quickly had ChatGPT write a plausible fake letter, one that passes the access off as an examination of the domain controller by a technical specialist. GuidePoint considers it likely that this let the actor show a properly written message to whoever discovered the intrusion, and possible that the person calmed down and the intrusion continued.
Caveat: The victim is not named in the chat log. The logs come from a leak posted on February 11, 2025 and cover September 18, 2023 to September 28, 2024; GuidePoint says they appear authentic and that parts could be verified against its own incident response cases, but they are a leak, not an investigation at the victim.
#

Ransomware group destroys data with a likely LLM-⁠generated PowerShell script (APT INC)#

augmented
According to CrowdStrike, the big game hunting ransomware group APT INC used an uncommon PowerShell script to destroy data on a physical host. Based on the comment formatting, the similarity to language model output and the lack of public sources resembling the script, CrowdStrike considers it likely that a language model generated the code.
Caveat: CrowdStrike gives the incident two sentences in its 2025 Global Threat Report, without a date or the victim’s sector or country. The report considers the AI origin only likely and names neither model nor prompt.
#

Teenagers hijack Rakuten accounts with a ChatGPT-assisted program to get mobile lines#

augmented · Attack date December 2023
Tokyo police arrested three students aged 14 to 16 who allegedly used a self-written program and purchased credentials to log in to Rakuten Mobile automatically and sign up for mobile lines; they are accused of taking out 105 lines through eleven other people’s accounts between May and August 2024. According to the Yomiuri newspaper, they used ChatGPT while writing the program to work more efficiently and speed up processing. One of the students told investigators he had signed up for more than 1,000 lines since December 2023; the lines were resold over Telegram, and police put the proceeds at about 7.5 million yen in cryptocurrency.
Caveat: Police statements and statements by the suspects, no verdict. A senior investigator told Yomiuri that only part of the program relied on generative AI and that the students wrote most of it themselves.
#

Watering-hole attack in China spreads likely AI-⁠written Python plugins (UTG-⁠Q-⁠015)#

augmented
In its 2024 annual report, Chinese security firm Qianxin describes the group UTG-⁠Q-⁠015, which in late 2024 compromised the IT community CSDN, other websites including government sites and a long-established component for share buttons, and showed visitors from the office networks of more than a hundred selected organizations a convincing phishing window. Among the plugins downloaded afterward, Qianxin found PyInstaller-packed Python programs with many clean Chinese comments and a few English ones and considers it very likely that the attacker had large language models generate the scripts.
Caveat: Qianxin bases the AI assessment only on the comment style and its own experience with GPT and names no specific model; it reads the Chinese comments as a possible attempt to disguise where the attackers come from. The report does not say how many machines the plugins reached.
#

Jamtara police arrest a gang that built Android malware with ChatGPT (DK Boss)#

augmented
Jamtara’s cyber police arrest six men of a syndicate that, under the name DK Boss, builds malicious Android packages that pose as applications for government welfare schemes and as banking apps and redirect SMS and calls to a central panel, and sells them to other gangs for 20,000 to 25,000 rupees. Data of about 2,700 victims with more than 270,000 intercepted messages was recovered; point 13 of the press release states the group used ChatGPT to develop the malware.
Caveat: The AI attribution is one line in a police press release without published forensics. Reports differ on the number of intercepted messages: The420.in gives more than 700,000, while the Indian Express quotes the police chief with more than 270,000.
#

Likely AI-⁠made HTML files smuggle in a RAT (XWorm)#

augmented
In the third quarter of 2024, HP Sure Click stopped a campaign that delivered the XWorm remote access trojan through HTML smuggling (the malware is hidden, encoded, inside the HTML file itself): opened in a browser, the file downloads an executable in the background that looks like a shortcut in File Explorer but is actually a compiled AutoIt script, which loads XWorm into memory only when the user starts it manually. According to HP, the HTML files bear hallmarks of being written with generative AI, namely comments on even simple statements and a page design almost identical to what ChatGPT 4o produced when asked for a download page.
Caveat: HP considers AI assistance only a plausible but not conclusive explanation for the many comments and sees no evidence of attackers developing payloads such as XWorm with AI. The report names no targets and gives no number of recipients or infections.
#

Ransomware affiliate keeps access through a likely AI-⁠written Python backdoor (RansomHub)#

augmented
During an incident response engagement in the fourth quarter of 2024, GuidePoint found a Python backdoor that a RansomHub ransomware affiliate dropped about 20 minutes after gaining initial access through fake browser updates (SocGholish), spread to further machines over RDP and used as a proxy into the network; the affiliate later encrypted the entire environment. GuidePoint calls the deobfuscated code extremely polished, with descriptive method names, thorough error handling and verbose debug messages, which it says matches patterns often seen in AI-⁠generated code. Even for unimplemented parts, the author, or likely an AI, added logging.
Caveat: GuidePoint also considers a very meticulous human programmer possible and names no model. The backdoor has existed in functionally the same form since December 2023; mainly the obfuscation changed. The victim and its industry are not named.
#

Ransomware group claims over 85 victims and writes its code with AI help (FunkSec)#

augmented
In December 2024, FunkSec publishes more than 85 claimed victims, more than any other ransomware group that month. The public scripts of an inexperienced Algerian author carry detailed comments in perfect English that Check Point considers LLM-⁠generated, and the Rust encryptor shows similar patterns; in its own published messages, the group itself links the development of its ransomware to AI assistants.
Caveat: Victim count and AI use rest largely on the group’s own claims; parts of the leaks were recycled hacktivism data. The report names no individual victim.

2024

#

TradingView lure script built from ChatGPT drafts leads to NetSupport RAT#

augmented
According to Gen, unsuspecting users copied a malicious script from legitimate content-sharing sites that urged them to enable dev-⁠mode for TradingView and to run terminal commands that ultimately install malware; the attack chain leads to NetSupport RAT. Through the clipboard protection in Norton, Avast and AVG, Gen traced the script’s development in three stages: the first two versions were clearly drafts obtained from ChatGPT, which the attackers then refined into the final version.
Caveat: Gen does not show how it identifies the drafts as ChatGPT output, nor on whose computer the clipboard captured them. How much of the final, distributed version still came from ChatGPT is unclear. The report documents no infection, leaves open how many users copied the script, and the victims remain anonymous.
#

Eight possible AI agents among eight million hits on an SSH honeypot#

directed‑autonomous
Reworr and Dmitrii Volkov of Palisade Research run an SSH honeypot on the open internet whose login banner, command output and system files carry prompt injections. Anyone acting on the injected instruction counts as a potential AI agent; whether a model was really answering, the authors check separately through response time, since their own test agents usually replied within 1.7 seconds. Over about three months they log 8,130,731 interaction attempts, among them eight potential AI agents.
Caveat: A honeypot was hit, not a real victim; the entry is therefore listed as a honeypot case. The eight are only potential agents, since only those passing both checks count as confirmed; actor and model are unknown, and the authors call their detection new and little tested. The figures come from the version of February 10, 2025; a follow-up of February 12 gives seven potential agents and one confirmed, the discontinued dashboard 14 and three.
#

Spear phishing targets OpenAI employees, ChatGPT used for recon (SugarGh0st, SweetSpecter)#

augmented
In May 2024 OpenAI received a tip from a credible source that the suspected China-based actor SweetSpecter was sending spear phishing mails to the corporate and personal addresses of individual employees: the sender posed as a ChatGPT user asking for support, and an attachment named some problems.zip held a shortcut file that, when opened, displays a document listing apparent ChatGPT error and service messages while decrypting and running the SugarGh0st remote access trojan in the background; according to OpenAI the mails never reached the corporate mailboxes and the attack failed. ChatGPT accounts running on the same infrastructure were used for reconnaissance, vulnerability research and scripting, among other things on vulnerable Log4j versions and on uploading a web shell with sqlmap (a tool that exploits SQL injection automatically).
Caveat: The report does not say that the lure texts themselves came from a model, and OpenAI attributes the accounts to the actor only as likely, based on an assessment from a credible source. The report does not date the mails themselves.
#

Likely AI-⁠written scripts in a fake invoice deliver AsyncRAT#

augmented · Attack date June 2024
In early June 2024, HP Sure Click isolated an HTML attachment disguised as an invoice in a French-language email; the file releases an AES-⁠encrypted archive only after a password is entered. A VBScript inside starts a chain of JavaScript and PowerShell that ends with the AsyncRAT remote access trojan running. Because the VBScript and JavaScript are unobfuscated and commented line by line, and their structure and function and variable names fit the same pattern, HP considers it highly likely that the attacker wrote them with the help of generative AI.
Caveat: HP considers AI involvement highly likely rather than established and names no model. The report gives no recipients and no number of attachments or infections.
#

Attackers inject likely AI-⁠generated malicious code into WordPress.org plugins#

augmented · Attack date June 2024
In June 2024, using five WordPress.org developer accounts whose passwords came from unrelated data breaches, attackers pushed malicious code into plugins such as Social Warfare and Blaze Widget; on sites that installed the update the code created an administrator account and sent its credentials to an attacker server, and later versions loaded a cryptominer and a wallet drainer. According to Wordfence, non-⁠functional or poorly refactored code and a lack of code reuse suggest that AI generated parts of the code. In April 2025 Wordfence wrote that the malware from this attack was AI-⁠generated.
Caveat: Wordfence infers the AI origin from features of the code. In June 2024 it said only that these features pointed to AI, and its first report offered the alternative that the attacker copied the code from other sources; the April 2025 statement names no model and no new evidence. None of the reports says how many sites installed the update.
#

Phishing campaigns load malware through likely LLM-⁠written scripts#

augmented
Symantec observed phishing campaigns whose scripts for downloading malware were, by the vendor’s analysis, apparently generated with language models. In a campaign targeting a wide range of sectors, an LNK file from a password-protected ZIP attachment runs a PowerShell script likely generated by an LLM; the final payloads deployed included the Rhadamanthys stealer and the CleanUpLoader backdoor. In a second chain, disguised as an HR notification, an HTML file with JavaScript highly likely generated by an LLM downloads a loader for Dunihi (H-Worm).
Caveat: Symantec infers a language model only from the formatting and comment style of the scripts, reproduced similar scripts with ChatGPT and names neither the model nor the attackers. The report names no infected victim and gives no number of infections. In an April 2024 bulletin, Symantec attributes to TA547 a campaign that used the same method to deliver CleanUpLoader as well; no source says whether it is the first chain in the report.
#

Likely LLM-⁠written loader targets organizations in Germany (TA547)#

augmented · Attack date March 2024
In March 2024, the initial access broker TA547 delivers a PowerShell loader script for the Rhadamanthys stealer to dozens of organizations in Germany via LNK, disguised as a Metro invoice. Proofpoint considers the grammatically perfect, hyper-specific line comments typical LLM output; it is the first campaign in which researchers observed TA547 use Rhadamanthys.
Caveat: Proofpoint frames the AI origin throughout the blog post as a suspicion without a confidence level, though it gave BleepingComputer a medium to high confidence, and leaves open that TA547 may have copied the script from elsewhere.
#

Likely LLM-⁠written commands dump Entra ID identifiers (Scattered Spider)#

augmented
CrowdStrike describes how Scattered Spider, in the second half of 2023, used the Azure AD PowerShell module at a North American financial services victim to download all users’ immutable Entra ID identifiers; through an Entra ID backdoor the actor could then log in as any of them. CrowdStrike says the PowerShell used resembled large language model output such as that from ChatGPT, and that the pattern of one comment, the actual command and then a new line for each command matches the Llama 2 70B model output.
Caveat: CrowdStrike infers the AI origin from code style alone and calls it likely, not established, that a language model produced the script; the victim is identified only by sector and region. The report also states that CrowdStrike’s visibility into the use of such tools is likely incomplete.
#

Attacker opens ChatGPT while stealing Azure credentials (Indrik Spider)#

augmented · Attack date February 2023
CrowdStrike Services responded to an incident in February 2023 involving Indrik Spider and Bitwise Spider’s LockBit RED ransomware, during which Indrik Spider exfiltrated credentials from the cloud-based credential manager Azure Key Vault. Logs show the attacker visiting ChatGPT while working in the Azure portal, presumably to understand how to navigate in Azure, and using search engines such as Google and Bing as well as GitHub to work out how to exfiltrate the Key Vault credentials. CrowdStrike reads the search engines and the ChatGPT visits as a sign that the group is likely new to the cloud and is using generative AI to fill its knowledge gaps.
Caveat: What is documented is the visit in the browser history, not what the attacker typed there or took from it; the victim is not named. CrowdStrike states that its visibility into the use of such tools is likely incomplete.
#

Five nation-state actors from Russia, North Korea, Iran and China use GPT-⁠4 for groundwork#

augmented
Microsoft and OpenAI document five state actors from Russia, North Korea, Iran and China using GPT-⁠4: four for reconnaissance on targets or technology, all five for scripting, three of them additionally for phishing texts, two also for translation. What is documented is groundwork throughout, such as research on satellite and radar technology, no attack against a target; Microsoft notes that it has not observed any particularly novel AI-⁠enabled attack techniques.
Caveat: The entry is listed as the earliest vendor report in this list on state model use, not as the first attack. The report names no individual victim.

2023

#

Four security engineers refine ransomware with ChatGPT to extort Hangzhou firms#

augmented · Attack date 2023⁠-⁠11⁠-⁠20
A company in Hangzhou reports encrypted servers on November 20, 2023, and the attackers demand 20,000 Tether (a dollar-pegged cryptocurrency). Police arrest four suspects with security qualifications, who confess to writing the malware themselves, optimizing it with ChatGPT and extorting the company; the South China Morning Post calls it the first such case in China. In May 2025 Xinhua reports the final verdict of the Shangcheng District People’s Court, three to seven and a half years in prison, names as victims a long-established medical institution whose 89 servers went down and which paid, plus two further companies, and quotes the prosecutor as saying the group used AI to help modify the malware code.
Caveat: All information traces back to the state news agency Xinhua, which relies on police and prosecutors; technical details of the AI use are missing. The verdict report names no model, only AI assistance, and does not state explicitly that the medical institution is the company that filed the complaint on November 20, 2023.
#

Suspect empties company accounts with a draining program written by ChatGPT#

augmented · Attack date April 2023
On August 24, 2023, Zhejiang’s provincial police present five typical cases from their crackdown on cybercrime, and the first is the earliest entry in this list: in April 2023, Hangzhou’s cyber police notice corporate payment accounts behaving oddly. The suspect, arrested in Thailand, obtained the payment keys through a system flaw, then used ChatGPT to write a withdrawal program, emptied the accounts one after another and laundered the proceeds through cryptocurrencies; police credit the intrusion itself to his own skill.
Caveat: A companion report from the same press conference gives 575 affected companies and losses of nearly ten million yuan for this case; neither report names the flaw, and there is no case outcome and no prompts.

Context

The attack itself often happened well before the day the case became public. Black Basta, EncryptHub, BlueNoroff and BREEZE COMET can be dated to 2023 and 2024, but they came to light months to years later. With Black Basta and EncryptHub, the AI use surfaced only through the attackers’ own slips, through leaked internal chats in one case and an open directory holding the actor’s own ChatGPT conversations in the other. Sorted by the time of the attack rather than by disclosure, the list would be more densely populated in its early phase.

Attackers began using AI before there were agents. In February 2023, an attacker opened ChatGPT in the middle of an intrusion; in CrowdStrike’s reading, he wanted to find his way around the Azure portal. In April 2023, police in Hangzhou noticed corporate payment accounts behaving oddly; by their account, the offender had ChatGPT write the program with which he turned stolen payment keys into money in bulk. From the second half of 2023, researchers came across malicious code they considered LLM-generated, at first only because of the style of its comments. In 2025, a ransomware group began using chatbots to help negotiate with its victims. In July 2025, malware called a model at runtime on its own, the first case of its kind in the list, and in November Anthropic reported that an agent had handled 80 to 90 percent of an espionage campaign by itself. Since spring 2026, AI has turned up in cases of every size, with opportunists as well as state actors, and since the summer, largely agent-run attacks with hundreds of victims have been piling up.

So far this list contains no attack with a documented AI component that disrupted a physical process. According to CISA and four other US agencies, however, attackers have already gained access to industrial equipment. Their August 2026 advisory says the attackers used AI-generated scripts to read and write data blocks on internet-exposed Siemens S7 controllers in the US. The agencies assess this as likely reconnaissance in preparation for later disruption; they name neither victims nor an actor, and do not say how they determined that the scripts were AI-generated. In the Polish sabotage case of December 2025, CERT Polska’s AI assessment concerns only a wiper script, and that script was found at a manufacturing company the attacker went after opportunistically. For the destroyed remote terminal units at the wind and solar farms, the report names no AI involvement. In the attack on Mexican government agencies, Dragos describes Claude independently identifying a SCADA interface at the Monterrey water utility as a target, but its password spray did not get it into the OT environment.

The main shift is in the attackers’ cost-benefit calculation. According to OALABS, a technically weak actor compromised at least 14 companies with a stolen Claude instance, and in an intrusion investigated by Unit 42, agents chained more than 50 attack techniques in under ten hours, work Unit 42 estimates would take about two weeks by hand. It was the attacker who said, during negotiations with Unit 42, that agents were involved. This list does not settle whether AI has also raised the ceiling of what an attacker can do. In 2024 Microsoft and OpenAI stated that they had not observed particularly novel AI-enabled techniques, and in September 2026 Anthropic wrote that none of the operations in its report depended on an entirely novel technique and that what had changed was mainly the cost of an attack. Amazon watched an actor largely fail as soon as they tried anything beyond the simplest automated paths. The abuse reports of the AI vendors, however, rest on the vendors’ own telemetry and usually name neither victims nor indicators. Some entries do not quite fit the view that AI mainly lowers the cost of an attack. The French-speaking lone actor GTG-50029 exploited a WordPress race condition that Anthropic describes as previously undocumented, and in the attacks exploiting two freshly disclosed PaperCut flaws, according to GreyNoise, just under four hours passed between setting up a workspace and first code execution against a real victim.

Fully autonomous cases, with no human choosing the target, appear in this list so far almost only as accidents out of lab environments: misconfigurations let models reach the real internet, agents broke out of their sandbox, a model used the network access of a training run to obtain someone else’s credentials, or an agent secured compute and an outbound remote channel for itself during training. The models involved come from five AI labs and were tested at the labs themselves, at testing partners and at a government testing institute. There is also an agent fleet that tried to pull data from Alibaba’s mapping service Amap; according to Tencent, it ran during evaluations of other developers’ models, though the company does not say which model. Outside the lab, the list holds only a few borderline cases: an agent that did an everyday task for an ordinary user and exploited a vulnerability in the process, a security vendor’s pentest agent that mistook an uninvolved vendor for its target and attacked its systems, and agents that researchers or affected organizations attribute to OpenAI without OpenAI confirming it, as with the RubyGems package flood and at Wikimedia. Where criminals use agents, they still choose the targets themselves, as far as is known.

Many of the best-documented cases come from independent researchers, and they often go back to the attackers’ mistakes in their own operational security. They left directories with session logs open, listed the agent as co-author in commit metadata, or left the comments in which the model described its own steps in the victims’ shell history. Some of these traces had no counterpart in traditional tradecraft, but they will not be reliable for long. Anyone who has read the vendor reports knows how to strip emojis, comments and metadata; with Kimsuky, leftover typos already point to manual post-editing. So the list reflects how careless attackers have been with AI so far, rather than how much AI is actually in use. Conversely, many AI attributions rest only on stylistic traits such as comments and emojis, and some only on a victim’s preliminary assessment or on the attackers’ own claims, so the list may also include cases in which no AI was involved.

What the list leaves out

Method

The list grew out of several rounds of research across personal link collections, vendor reports and web search, in English as well as in other languages. Duplicates and follow-up reports on the same case were merged into one entry each. Frank Ully maintains the list. You can report missing cases or errors through the contact page.